We performed a comparison between Alluvio Aternity and SCOM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Nexthink, Lakeside Software, ControlUp and others in DEM - Digital Experience Monitoring."There are many valuable features. If I had to single out one, it would be the UXI score. That's a proprietary Aternity score that tells you how good or bad the experience is for a user on that particular machine, for a particular app. It neatly encapsulates the pain of the user in a single score. It's very easy to find issues and then drill down further into those issues, based on that score."
"Alluvio Aternity is stable."
"Aternity easily provides visibility of all the endpoint machines to my clients."
"The data the solution provides is valuable to us; we can see the health of the machines, how they are performing, and what might be causing issues on a particular machine."
"The most valuable feature of Alluvio Aternity is the compiling and displaying of end-user data so that we can utilize it to troubleshoot proactively."
"The ability to quickly utilize the dashboard to gather information is valuable from a DXI perspective."
"The most valuable feature of SCOM is real-time alerts."
"The stability has been great."
"The most valuable feature of SCOM is the capability of using classes within your management pack development."
"The solution has improved our overrides and the ability to start services if they're stopped."
"Being able to make and customize management packs and send out notifications is very valuable."
"SCOM has helped us to monitor all the VMs in our environment, especially the Windows servers."
"The ease of deployment, especially on Windows platforms, is valuable."
"SCOM's most valuable features are the network path feature, reporting, and integration with business intelligence."
"I would like to see more granular performance counters collected and viewable from the endpoints. That would be great."
"I would like Alluvio Aternity to be certified by the IRAP for petrol companies in Australia."
"The licensing model doesn't suit the market we are in and has room for improvement."
"I want more reporting around asset management, with greater flexibility and customization ability."
"The solution's downloadable reports could be improved."
"The solution is available at a higher price than other solutions."
"There could be more integration of SIM in the solution."
"The GI is difficult to work with and the reporting servers are also difficult."
"The solution’s initial setup is difficult."
"Regarding certain issues in the solution, it can be difficult to generate reports if we have a program that is not user-friendly for reporting. While this is not necessarily negative, we may need to use another solution."
"The solution can be improved by expanding to cloud usage."
"We didn't know the solution enough, and therefore, it took a while to set everything up correctly. There was a learning curve."
"SCOM's feature that notifies us when a server is down is not present in recent updates, which has weakened the product."
"Application monitoring must be improved."
Alluvio Aternity is ranked 4th in DEM - Digital Experience Monitoring with 6 reviews while SCOM is ranked 3rd in Event Monitoring with 12 reviews. Alluvio Aternity is rated 8.2, while SCOM is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Alluvio Aternity writes "Enables us to be a lot more agile and proactive in troubleshooting endpoint issues thanks to accurate UX scoring". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SCOM writes "We can monitor all the VMs in our environment and access full insight reports for all the VMs, but the solution is not stable". Alluvio Aternity is most compared with Dynatrace, Nexthink, AppDynamics and SysTrack, whereas SCOM is most compared with Zabbix, Dynatrace, Datadog, AppDynamics and PRTG Network Monitor.
We monitor all DEM - Digital Experience Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.