No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Aisera’s AI Copilot vs Kore.ai comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Aisera’s AI Copilot
Ranking in AI Customer Support
12th
Ranking in AI IT Support
10th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Kore.ai
Ranking in AI Customer Support
2nd
Ranking in AI IT Support
7th
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
AI Agent Builders (7th), AI Customer Experience Personalization (8th), AI Security (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the AI Customer Support category, the mindshare of Aisera’s AI Copilot is 1.0%. The mindshare of Kore.ai is 1.7%, down from 26.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
AI Customer Support Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Kore.ai1.7%
Aisera’s AI Copilot1.0%
Other97.3%
AI Customer Support
 

Featured Reviews

Vinitha Kundawad - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Implementation Engineer at Cisco
Automation of IT support has reduced repetitive tasks and now improves service efficiency
I believe that Aisera's AI Copilot could be improved with a more simplified initial implementation. There should be more out-of-the-box workflows as we have within other AI Copilots, and there should also be improved troubleshooting dashboards and better visibility for us to make AI decision-making. Additionally, while the support quality is generally good, I see that the implementation success depends heavily on planning, knowledge readiness, and integration design, but the customer support experience could be improved. I believe there are improvements needed that I haven't mentioned yet, including measurable productivity benefits and good enterprise integrations, which will also be appreciated. Since our success depends on data quality, that should also be improved, and the initial implementation must also see improvements so that we have a faster onboarding experience and easier performance and ROI reporting.
Judin Augustin - PeerSpot reviewer
Associate Data Scientist at Guide House
Automation has reduced large call centers and provides real-time outbound support for patients
Kore.ai is a low-code platform, and you do not necessarily have to be an expert in artificial intelligence or generative AI to use this platform. However, if you have that experience, it will be a valuable add-on. The main advantage is that it has almost every kind of plugin available to use, whether for live agents or if you want to use it as a call center. You have real-time capabilities and the most useful plugins available, with almost every kind of model available with configurations. We can configure the ML models and train them. The platform is very user-friendly with explanatory features and a great UI. One significant feature is the live testing platform with Kore.ai. When you are creating a workflow, you have an interactive, real-time testing platform that reflects every change you make. This makes it easy to debug errors or add new features. Additionally, Kore.ai has many different tools and platforms that cater to different needs, whether for a call center, normal workflow, or machine learning workflow, which is really useful. Because of Kore.ai, it was much easier than creating something manually. A low-code platform always helps, and when that platform has this much capability, it provides far more value than manual development. It was particularly helpful for our team that we could create a POC and get that project into production. Kore.ai helped our team build a generative AI outbound calling chatbot, and it truly helped our customers. If you have a hospital with a thousand employees in a call center, you might consider outsourcing. However, with Kore.ai's outbound calling capabilities, you can eliminate the outsourcing part. You do not need a thousand call center employees. You can accomplish this through automation with just one or two employees if people need to switch to agents. This represented a significant cost reduction.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Overall, Aisera's AI Copilot has become much more than a helpdesk tool for me; it is a central nervous system connecting employees to information and IT support across the entire organization."
"Aisera's AI Copilot has achieved up to 75% automation of user requests, which is going to reduce our 80% consumer operation costs."
"Kore.ai has positively impacted my organization by being a big money saver because before having our chatbot, the use case was that every time some of our customers needed help, they used to call a number."
"Kore.ai has positively impacted my organization by helping us build intelligent chatbots and incorporating voice agents, enabling various clients to adopt these solutions, which have been revolutionary for their businesses."
"Kore.ai has positively impacted my organization because we are implementors, and I would say that approximately 80% of our income comes from developed projects with Kore.ai."
"Kore.ai helped us integrate a lot through documentation and trial and error, making it straightforward to integrate overall, resulting in a very good experience for first-timers."
"It impacted my organization by helping us move into being AI-native, and it helped a lot to show other clients that we have worked in AI."
"Kore.ai has positively impacted our organization by reducing error rates from around fifteen to twenty percent to just two to three percent after implementation."
"Compared to other tools, Kore.ai provides a well-organized chatbot experience that others do not offer."
"Kore.ai offers multiple support and services, including API integration, webhook integration, and multiple channels, making it easy to design your own layout, integrate with multiple channels and webhooks, deploy quickly, and track any errors that occur, so it is a good way to start and easy to learn."
 

Cons

"I believe that Aisera's AI Copilot could be improved with a more simplified initial implementation."
"There are several areas for improvement. First, hallucination control: being an LLM-based system, Aisera's AI Copilot occasionally generates confident but incorrect answers."
"In my experience, Kore.ai is not stable."
"I would suggest incorporating pre-recorded videos in the tutorials and enhancing the documentation area to make it more user-friendly."
"Kore.ai can be improved by enhancing their documentation, which is currently a bit disorganized."
"I rated Kore.ai eight out of ten because of the potential for these additional improvements."
"The two points I deduct relate to the integrations, which were not as extensive as I initially expected."
"I rated Kore.ai an 8 out of 10 because additional features could be added to it."
"I choose 7.5 out of 10 for Kore.ai because a few things already need to be improved, one of which I have mentioned."
"One thing I have learned is the unpredictability of LLMs and how buggy Kore.ai is as a software."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Customer Support solutions are best for your needs.
909,153 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
13%
Construction Company
12%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Large Enterprise7
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business1
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise14
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Aisera’s AI Copilot?
There are several areas for improvement. First, hallucination control: being an LLM-based system, Aisera's AI Copilot occasionally generates confident but incorrect answers. Better guardrails and u...
What is your primary use case for Aisera’s AI Copilot?
I use Aisera's AI Copilot mainly for three things: automating repeated IT support tickets, providing instant AI-powered answers to employee queries, and integrating with existing tools such as Slac...
What advice do you have for others considering Aisera’s AI Copilot?
I would add that in my team or my perspective, a few additional things are worth sharing. One thing that genuinely surprised me was how different team members interacted with Aisera's AI Copilot di...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kore.ai?
The experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing of Kore.ai is that the price is low, and the licensing is also not costly.
What needs improvement with Kore.ai?
I do not have much to add regarding how Kore.ai can be improved since it has been a long time since we last used it. There are other platforms that offer more features, but those come at a higher p...
What is your primary use case for Kore.ai?
In my past organization, I used Kore.ai for one of the projects over a period of approximately six to eight months. Our main use case for Kore.ai involved building a Gen AI plus conversational AI p...
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Leading banks & Enterprise Companies
Find out what your peers are saying about Aisera’s AI Copilot vs. Kore.ai and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
909,153 professionals have used our research since 2012.