Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM) vs GEP SMART comparison

Agiloft and GEP Worldwide are both solutions in the Contract Management Software category. Agiloft is ranked #5, while GEP Worldwide is ranked #8. Agiloft holds a 7.1% mindshare in CMS, compared to GEP Worldwide’s 3.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Agiloft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of GEP Worldwide users who would recommend it.

Agiloft Contract Lifecycle ...

Read 4 Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM) reviews

589 Views
583 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GEP SMART

Read 13 GEP SMART reviews

1,883 Views
490 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Agiloft Contract Lifecycle ...

GEP SMART

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM) and GEP SMART based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Contract Management Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM) vs. GEP SMART Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM) vs. GEP SMART

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,933 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Agiloft Contract Lifecycle ...

Ranking in Contract Management Software

5th

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GEP SMART

Ranking in Contract Management Software

8th

Average Rating

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Procurement Software (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Contract Management Software category, the mindshare of Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM) is 7.1%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GEP SMART is 3.3%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Contract Management Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM)	7.1%
GEP SMART	3.3%
Other	89.6%

Contract Management Software

Featured Reviews

it_user658929

Systems Analyst at a tech vendor

Email reminders notify relevant individuals and departments that contracts are due to be renewed or have expired.

Safe Horizon has successfully implemented the Agiloft Contract Management System as tailored to meet the specific needs of our organization’s contract approval and renewal workflow. The flexibility and relative ease of implementing functionality and modifications without programming has proven to be most striking. We were pleased by the functionality and smooth integration between Agiloft and DocuSign. The handoff of documents from Agiloft to DocuSign and back again to Agiloft is easy and seamless. The capability of being able to sign internal documents, as well as those requiring both internal and outside vendor signatures without necessitating a great deal of setup can help facilitate the contract completion process.

Read full review

ChristinaJones

Senior Product Manager at a university with 10,001+ employees

Doesn't require a background in analytics to run reports

SMART has been helpful for sourcing and public bids. For regulatory purposes, our university posts bids, depending on the scope of the bid. We get a lot of value out of SMART's ability to post to a public site and have suppliers see that information, register in the tool, and participate. SMART features for collecting information and its timeline capabilities are highly useful. Then on the contract side, the reporting capabilities are the most valuable. Our use case focuses primarily on post-execution and lifecycle management, so it's essential to be able to report accurately especially compliance-related reports. SMART is easy to use, especially when reporting. It isn't designed for a hardcore analyst. You don't need to have a background in analytics to run reports, which is huge. I realized I hadn't touched too much on the spending side, but we use SMART for all spending analytics, and any commodity manager procurement professional can go in and run a spending report. That was a business decision to restrict who can run reports since that data can be exported and used. But the reporting capabilities are incredibly easy to use.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is obvious to me that Agiloft can handle much more than contract management, as the specific requirements that were not part of Agiloft's initial configuration were implemented seamlessly."

"Project HOME has easily recovered its initial capital outlay in the first year from simple centralization and automated approval tracking."

"Safe Horizon has successfully implemented the Agiloft Contract Management System as tailored to meet the specific needs of our organization’s contract approval and renewal workflow."

"Among the most valuable features are the ability to send out purchase orders, create catalogs, and accept invoices through procurement. And the reporting function is robust."

"There are additional time savings in managing communications. If you have an open RFP and there are questions, you can manage all of the questions and answers in the thread inside that RFP. All the suppliers will get any notifications that you want them to get, and everything is within the body of the RFP so you don't have to worry about things in email, outside of the system."

"It's user-friendly, in terms of the design of the tool."

"It's really simple to use. That's one of the reasons we chose GEP over some of the others. It's very Google-like. On the homepage, you just type whatever you need. And there are tabs that can come up if you're looking for a certain word or phrase..."

"We operate with three different systems that input data. The fact that GEP consolidates all that information into one place is a big deal for us. It streamlines that data for us."

"In terms of ease of use, GEP has done a lot of work through its enhancements over the years to make the user experience more intuitive. There is a more standard-Amazon-like experience, where manuals and tutorials are not really required, simply because the user experience and what's on the screen are pretty intuitive."

"Spend gives us a way to put all of our spend in one area and use a category hierarchy to pull real-time spend data."

"I love it because everything is done within the contract module. The previous tool that we had really acted more as a repository, whereas this is the lifecycle. Once a business owner gets to the point where they want to enter into a contractual relationship with a party, from that point, including the drafting of it through to the signature on it, it covers the lifecycle. It's from the beginning to the end to even the archiving. It's all done within the tool, including e-signature."

More GEP SMART pros

Cons

"One area of improvement I would suggest Agiloft to focus on would be how users interact with attachments to records."

"If there is an area for improvement, it would be in the mobile aspect."

"While it captures all the fields and requirements, when any supplier updates or new supplier registration happens, then the supplier needs to update their bank details. Our IT team has made it so every half an hour the GEP SMART system will push the supplier to the Oracle Database. So, we have faced some problems, like bank details, etc. We addressed this issue with GEP. They are working on it to make bank details a mandatory field for any supplier and match our requirements. Their engineering team has taken up creating a customized process for us."

"We had a lot of challenges and disagreements with SMART. It's been a long road, for sure, on the contract side. There is a little bit of pushback on their part when we need stuff done. Things aren't done very efficiently. I'm still waiting on some changes that were requested well over a year-and-a-half ago."

"Their contracts module is kind of clunky and It took a while for them to correct some of the basic functionality, some of the "Contract Management 101" functions, but it seems to be coming around. It wasn't working the way we'd expected."

"We didn't like their dashboard initially, but they responded to that very well. They've given us some customizable dashboards and have also made it so that the dashboards can be exported into PDF and other formats, so that we can share them with the rest of the company... That was a weakness at the beginning, but one that they have responded to adequately and we're really pleased with the result."

"I'd like to see drag-and-drop reporting. They have the old model for reports where you have to click the "run" button. The thing runs and then you have to export it to PowerPoint."

"There are no mechanisms for them to check up on how they refresh their data. So oftentimes, when we go into the tool and we don't see something, we alert them and they say, "Oh, the data hasn't been refreshed, so we'll go ahead and refresh it," and then what we're looking for pops up. We should not have to be the ones to tell them they need to refresh. There should be a mechanism in place for that."

"We definitely have some asks for enhancements. One of the big ones we'd like to see is what we call "drag-and-drop." If I have an email that I want to maintain in the SMART record for whatever reason — for example, it has supporting information in it — I would love to be able to just drop that into the notes and attachments section without having to save it as a PDF and then upload it."

"The manuals, especially the ones for the suppliers, are currently available only in English. If these can also be translated into different languages, that would be excellent."

More GEP SMART cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"If our organization could use it as a full-fledged solution, then it would be valuable and give a return on investment. However, since we are not currently using it as a full-fledged solution, even facing some bugs and problems with the synchronization with some of the internal software, we are not able to use it in a full-fledged manner."

"My advice is to think wisely when it comes to estimating the number of licenses that you will require. If you settle on a number too early and you need additional ones, then the extra licenses might be quite expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Contract Management Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

University

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Wholesaler/Distributor

Financial Services Firm

14%

Energy/Utilities Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Media Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	14

Comparisons

Coupa Contract Management vs Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM)

Compared 15% of the time

PeopleSoft Enterprise Supplier Contract Management vs Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM)

Compared 10% of the time

CobbleStone Systems Contract Insight vs Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM)

Compared 10% of the time

SirionLabs vs Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM)

Compared 9% of the time

Ironclad vs Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM)

Compared 5% of the time

More Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM) Competitors

SAP Ariba Procurement vs GEP SMART

Compared 33% of the time

Coupa Procure vs GEP SMART

Compared 13% of the time

Zycus Source to Pay Suite vs GEP SMART

Compared 11% of the time

JAGGAER Spend Director vs GEP SMART

Compared 7% of the time

DocuSign CLM vs GEP SMART

Compared 4% of the time

More GEP SMART Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM) vs. Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM)

March 2026

Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM) report

Download Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM) product report

Buyer's Guide

GEP SMART

March 2026

Download GEP SMART product report

Also Known As

Agiloft Contract Management Suite

SMART by GEP

Overview

Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) is designed to streamline contract management for businesses, delivering efficiency and compliance in the contract process.

Agiloft CLM offers robust tools to manage the entire contract lifecycle with customizable workflows, automation, and comprehensive reporting. It enhances visibility and control over contracts, reducing the risk and improving operational efficiency with scalable solutions adaptable to business requirements.

What are the valuable features of Agiloft CLM?

Custom Workflows: Tailor workflows to match specific processes.
Automated Alerts: Set notifications for contract milestones.
Advanced Reporting: Gain insights with detailed analytics.
Compliance Management: Ensure regulatory adherence with ease.

What benefits or ROI can reviews highlight for Agiloft CLM?

Increased Efficiency: Automate tasks to save time.
Risk Reduction: Improve compliance and monitoring.
Scalability: Adaptable to growth and changing requirements.
Improved Collaboration: Streamlined communication across teams.

Agiloft CLM is implemented across a wide range of industries, from healthcare to finance, optimizing contract management and compliance processes. Each sector benefits from tailored solutions that meet specific industry needs, enhancing both productivity and strategic contract handling.

Agiloft

GEP SMART is an AI-powered, cloud-native

software for direct and indirect procurement
that offers comprehensive source-to-pay
functionality in one user-friendly platform,
inclusive of spend analysis, sourcing, contract
management, supplier management,
procure-to-pay, savings project management
and savings tracking, invoicing and other
related functionalities.

GEP Worldwide

Sample Customers

Contract Mgmt: WeWork, Chevron, CSFI, Retrophin, Roche Diagnostics, Genentech, Global Healthcare Exchange, Fitch Ratings, Safehorizon, American Greetings, Doosan, Family Impact Network, Peloton Therapeutics, San Mateo County, Insmed, Roman Catholic Diocese of Dallas, Kaiser Permanente

Exxon Chevron Macys

Buyer's Guide

Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM) vs. GEP SMART

March 2026

Free Report: Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM) vs. GEP SMART

Find out what your peers are saying about Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM) vs. GEP SMART and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM) vs. GEP SMART report.

See our list of best Contract Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Contract Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.