"The linking of PI Objectives with different features was one of the cool things. It had features, epics, and stories out of the box."
"The most valuable features of this solution are workflow and reporting."
"This product provides you a good view of the status of your projects."
"The roadmap feature and the ability to integrate with Power BI are probably the most valuable features in it. It is a great solution. I absolutely love it. It is a tool that was designed for project management, and it has been awesome to work with it so far. I also love Confluence."
"Jira has a useful user interface and overall is easy to understand and learn."
"Jira is very user friendly, easy to install, and easy to access."
"Provides good output and is user-friendly."
"Jira is easy to use and there are a lot of tools that are integrated with it."
"I liked the flexibility of the application. It was pretty user-friendly."
"It should just have the integration with Jira. We haven't looked at it since Atlassian bought the product."
"The dashboard reports can be improved. Its dashboard reports are good, but you cannot have complex reports. They are currently very basic. For instance, we can only choose two columns for a dashboard, so it is not friendly enough."
"It would be ideal if Jira had future functionalities to integrate more easily with various aspects of code reviews."
"In Jira, say on the team, no matter the methodology, it doesn't matter what I'm practicing, if I am using the tool for a while and I've compiled some sort of history. If I want to change my workflow, say my team is today using to-do in progress done, and tomorrow, I decide I want to use to-do in review and done, and I apply that new workflow, I have just now effectively lost all of my histories in terms of reporting."
"I'd like some more features around software testing. I'd like to see some more stuff done around data testing. That's what I'm most interested in."
"I also wish Jira had an indicator to tell you that you are approaching the limit for the story points that can be delivered during a sprint. I don't think there is an indicator like that, but such an indicator will be very helpful because then I will be easily able to see that we are approaching the limit."
"Something I would like to see improved is the traceability feature. When you have a user story, if you can see all the test cases, it would be an improvement if you could see any design documents or any change management."
"There are a limited number of gadgets accessible in Jira; thus, additional ones should be supported."
"For our company, we're thinking about not only project management solutions but also collaboration solutions, and maybe if Jira had a chart or quick commenting option, it would be great."
AgileCraft is ranked 18th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 1 review while Jira is ranked 1st in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 162 reviews. AgileCraft is rated 7.0, while Jira is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AgileCraft writes "Linking of PI Objectives with different features was cool, but it didn't have integration with Jira". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Jira writes "Great for collaboration, very stable, and extracting data is straightforward". AgileCraft is most compared with Rally Software, IBM Engineering Workflow Management, Planview LeanKit, Jira Align and Broadcom Clarity PPM, whereas Jira is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Micro Focus ALM Octane, IBM Rational DOORS, TFS and Polarion ALM.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
