ADONIS vs Camunda comparison

Read 77 Camunda reviews

22,739 Views
15,917 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

ADONIS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

Camunda and ADONIS are both competitive solutions in the process management and automation space. Data comparisons suggest that Camunda’s open-source nature and community support give it an advantage in terms of adaptability, but ADONIS provides a broader range of features and toolsets.

Features: Camunda includes an embeddable process engine compliant with BPMN 2.0 standards. It also offers developer-friendly tools conducive to integration and process automation. ADONIS provides extensive modeling capabilities, business architecture frameworks, and integrated analysis tools, effectively supporting a business-wide approach.

Room for Improvement: Camunda could enhance its graphical user interface and offer more robust built-in analytics capabilities. It might also expand its integration options. ADONIS could benefit from offering a more developer-friendly environment, reducing complexity in deployment, and providing better customization capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Camunda offers a more streamlined deployment process, appealing to developers and organizations with technical expertise, primarily due to its open-source model and extensive documentation. In contrast, ADONIS excels in providing comprehensive onboarding services and customer support, crucial for organizations in need of direct guidance.

Pricing and ROI: Camunda typically presents a lower initial setup cost because of its open-source offering and community-driven resources. It delivers significant ROI for organizations with technical capabilities. Although ADONIS may have a higher setup cost, its extensive feature range and supportive services aim to justify its pricing, aligning with enterprises seeking comprehensive solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed ADONIS vs. Camunda Report (Updated: September 2025).

Download the complete report

ADONIS vs. Camunda

September 2025

Helped 867,349 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ADONIS

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

20th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Camunda

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (1st), Process Automation (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of ADONIS is 2.8%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Camunda is 16.5%, down from 21.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Camunda	16.5%
ADONIS	2.8%
Other	80.7%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Teguh Surya

AVP B2B Business Process Excellence at PT. Indosat Tbk

Process capabilities impress while user setup requires streamlining

I stopped using ADONIS because it is not capable of integrating and automating business processes for the POC. I see that Camunda is more capable for our POC project to orchestrate business processes. We also plan to integrate with UiPath because currently, we are focusing on task automations, not process orchestrations. In the future, we plan to implement process orchestrations. I see that Camunda can integrate UiPath into the process, process model, and process integrations. ADONIS needs improvement mainly in user-friendliness, setup, and installations. As an administrator at that time, I found it quite difficult to manage users because I needed to open specific software, possibly Java-based, which is not web-based and should be installed first to manage the users.

Read full review

FABIO NAGAO

Chief Technology Officer at Looplex SA

Reduces costs with hardware abstraction and simplifies scaling

There is an issue where, in some situations, I need to scale up by observing both CPU and memory usage of containers, yet under the current options available at Amazon, this is not possible. I have to choose between monitoring CPU or memory to scale my solution. Not every software is built for deployment as a container service, although the current architecture trend is changing this.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It seems that the process mapping and modeling features are well and thoroughly covered."

"ADONIS supports the project hierarchy and allows collaboration through methodological reviews and comments, enhancing decision-making."

"It's easy to handle the solution thanks to being drag and drop"

"The best features of the system include good analytics for business processes including the calculation of time and cost."

"It's a very complete solution."

"We haven't ever needed to take service breaks and we can scale it throughout our company without any problem."

"The product is useful for designing business processes and for repositories."

"There's this graphic that tells you how many lines or how many tickets are in each step. In that way, you know where you stand. I find this feature very valuable."

"The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part."

"We are documenting all of the processors and VPN. Then we are sharing it with our business users."

"It has been a stable solution so far since it meets our needs, including data modeling, which we need to do before we embark on analyzing and optimizing the business processes."

"It is open-source. It supports microservice orchestration. This is what we are really interested in. We can customize our products depending on the use cases."

"Camunda's process diagram creation and deployment is very easy."

"The architecture is good because it's a headless workflow. I can create my own frontend, and it's fully API-based."

"The most valuable feature is that, with a visual system, you can try to have a process client before beginning the programming for the application."

More Camunda pros

Cons

"We have to use a different solution to automate our business processes."

"The solution is in English and we have added certain parts in Russian as this is easier for our students. It would be useful to have the system in Russian."

"ADONIS needs improvement in its user interface functionality."

"This solution would be improved if 24/7 support were available."

"If there's no WiFi connection, you can't access ADONIS."

"There is a function to check if the model BPMN is being used correctly, but the report from the check is not always very clear."

"Rearranging things to get information from the objects and the model together to get a report out of them could be done better."

"ADONIS needs improvement mainly in user-friendliness, setup, and installations. As an administrator at that time, I found it quite difficult to manage users because I needed to open specific software, possibly Java-based, which is not web-based and should be installed first to manage the users."

"I would like to have a feature for audit logging, audit logs and audit log management. And some history of use for the audit logs."

"Initially, installation was challenging, but recent improvements have made it much easier."

"Community support is basically what I'm looking for. Other than that, it is okay for now."

"In the latest version, there are certain workflow nodes that are missing. Camunda should bring those back, or rather, develop them quickly."

"The documentation could use improvement."

"The business model could be easier to understand."

"There should be a multi-tenant solution for the platform where it supports multiple organizations on one platform instead of having to spin up multiple clusters for each organization. There should be an easy way to integrate different departments into one platform without having to operate multiple platforms. The operations should be easier with the enterprise solution. It should not create more overhead for the operations people."

"There are a few things that I'm missing. For instance, the user interface creator, which I know other systems have, like Aurea or Lombardi, which are IBM solutions. The interface creator, including the data model creator or some module which would allow the users who are not programmers or business consultants and who are not technically skilled in database and Java programming, to create data models and user interfaces."

More Camunda cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product’s price is quite competitive."

"The product's pricing is medium, so I rate it a five out of ten."

"We're using the free version. We used the Enterprise version for some time. If I compare free versus what we paid at that time, the Enterprise version costs a lot. For the additional functionality that we got with the Enterprise version, it was too costly."

"I think Camunda BPM can improve their licensing costs. It isn't easy to find clients with Camunda BPM licenses mainly because it's quite expensive."

"The price is competitive with products like Bonitasoft and RHPAM (Red Hat Process Automation Manager). We have two versions of Camunda. The first version was open source, without support, but then we got a supported version."

"We have an annual subscription to this solution."

"The cost of this solution is better than some competing products."

"Camunda is much cheaper."

"We are using the open-source version, free of charge. We didn't bother with the enterprise features."

"We are using the paid edition because there is no separate support and service license yet. We are yet to find a suitable licensing model for Camunda because we only use the engine, and we have implemented our solution around Camunda Cloud. So, we are mainly interested in the support and service, and that's what we mainly use in the paid edition."

More Camunda pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

University

Energy/Utilities Company

Financial Services Firm

26%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	41
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	29

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ADONIS?

It's easy to handle the solution thanks to being drag and drop

What needs improvement with ADONIS?

What is your primary use case for ADONIS?

We are using Camunda for process modeling, some collaborations for process development, and for the process documentation repository, we use SharePoint. We have used ADONIS process modeler, not jus...

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?

Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...

Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?

Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs ADONIS

Comparisons

Compared 26% of the time

ARIS BPA vs ADONIS

Compared 20% of the time

Bizagi vs ADONIS

Compared 8% of the time

MEGA HOPEX vs ADONIS

Compared 6% of the time

BIC Platform vs ADONIS

Compared 5% of the time

More ADONIS Competitors

Flowable vs Camunda

Compared 11% of the time

Apache Airflow vs Camunda

Compared 10% of the time

Temporal vs Camunda

Compared 9% of the time

Bizagi vs Camunda

Compared 8% of the time

Control-M vs Camunda

Compared 2% of the time

More Camunda Competitors

Product Reports

Business Process Management (BPM)

August 2025

Download ADONIS product report

Download Camunda product report

September 2025

Also Known As

No data available

Camunda BPM

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

BOC Group

Overview

ADONIS BPM suite is users' best-rated tool for process management, analysis and optimization, trusted by SMEs and large corporations worldwide. It helps you transform your business and create competitive advantage by streamlining processes, enhancing operational efficiency, boosting transparency and creating a customer-centric organization. You can start creating your digital twin with ADONIS already today, as the cloud-based ADONIS:Community Edition is available for free. For more information please visit www.boc-group.com/en/adonis/.

BOC Group

Camunda revolutionizes process orchestration by enabling seamless automation and integration with AI, human tasks, and existing systems while ensuring security and governance.

Built for collaboration between business and IT, Camunda empowers organizations to manage complexity, boost efficiency, and maintain competitive advantage. With a clientele of over 700 top organizations like Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone, Camunda is a trusted partner in designing, orchestrating, automating, and refining critical business processes to accelerate digital transformation. Its open-source nature, ease of use, and REST API integration make it a versatile choice for various needs.

What are Camunda's key features?

Lightweight Architecture: Offers streamlined and efficient process management.
Scalability: Supports growth and complexity in operations.
Flexibility with BPMN, CMMN, and DMN Standards: Ensures adaptability to different process modeling needs.
Open-Source: Encourages customization and user-specific enhancements.
Graphical Process Modeling: Intuitive interface for designing and automating processes.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Enhanced Efficiency: Streamlines processes for optimized performance.
Seamless Integration: Ensures smooth workflow across different systems.
Improved Collaboration: Facilitates effective cooperation between business and IT.
Customizability: Adapts to specific user requirements and system environments.

In banking, Camunda automates processes and manages transactions, while in telecommunications, it optimizes service orders. Governmental and public sectors benefit from workflow automation. Organizations often use either the enterprise edition or the open-source version to create APIs and manage business rules effectively.

Sample Customers

Trusted by small to large enterprises worldwide: ABB, Allianz, Comcast, ERGO, Emerson, Glencore, Lincoln Financial Group, Marel, Raiffeisen bank, Schroders, Southern Water, Stadt Wien, UNIQA, VAUDE, Voestalpine, Volksbank, Vorwerk

24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando