Adobe Workfront vs Planview AdaptiveWork comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Adobe and Planview are both solutions in the Project Management Software category. Adobe is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.3, while Planview is ranked #22. Adobe holds a 1.8% mindshare in PMS, compared to Planview’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Adobe users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Planview users who would recommend it.

Adobe Workfront

Read 42 Adobe Workfront reviews

6,442 Views
4,252 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Planview AdaptiveWork

Read 8 Planview AdaptiveWork reviews

3,055 Views
2,505 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Adobe Workfront

Planview AdaptiveWork

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Adobe Workfront and Planview AdaptiveWork are project management tools competing in productivity and collaboration enhancement. Adobe Workfront seems to have the upper hand with its flexibility and comprehensive integration capabilities, making it suitable for creative environments.

Features: Adobe Workfront features comprehensive project tracking, seamless integration with Adobe products, and dynamic workflow support. Planview AdaptiveWork offers robust resource management, strategic planning, and enhanced forecasting tools.

Room for Improvement: Adobe Workfront could improve in strategic planning depth, resource management, and cost transparency. Planview AdaptiveWork may need enhancements in flexibility, creative workflow integration, and user interface simplicity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Adobe Workfront provides a straightforward cloud-based deployment and responsive customer support. Planview AdaptiveWork offers a thorough initial setup due to extensive configuration options, with customer service focused on detailed configuration guidance.

Pricing and ROI: Adobe Workfront's competitive pricing accommodates scalable team sizes, offering reasonable ROI through integration capabilities. Planview AdaptiveWork may involve higher initial costs reflecting its advanced features, providing greater long-term benefits for organizations prioritizing strategic planning.

To learn more, read our detailed Adobe Workfront vs. Planview AdaptiveWork Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Adobe Workfront vs. Planview AdaptiveWork

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Adobe Workfront

Ranking in Project Management Software

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Digital Asset Management (1st)

Planview AdaptiveWork

Ranking in Project Management Software

22nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Project Management Software category, the mindshare of Adobe Workfront is 1.8%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Planview AdaptiveWork is 1.4%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Management Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Adobe Workfront	1.8%
Planview AdaptiveWork	1.4%
Other	96.8%

Project Management Software

Featured Reviews

AdityaGupta1

Adobe Workfront Specialist at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Have faced limitations in functionality and dependability while trying to streamline project management workflows

One of the best things about Adobe Workfront is that we can immediately track each project. We can keep track of all tasks with the help of milestones that we can add to a project. We can monitor everything effectively. The utilization and workload balancer allows us to clearly see if a person is over-utilized or if they are not getting utilized to at least 80 or 90%. This enables better tracking and work assignment with improved clarity. We use custom dashboards in Adobe Workfront to see all statuses. The integration capabilities with other software are quite good, with straightforward connectivity. We have HTTP connectors if we need to connect with external systems via APIs. If we have any API endpoint for any external tool, we can connect it with Adobe Workfront using Fusion. Reporting is a major part of Adobe Workfront, making it not just a workflow management tool but also a tool where we can get data and present it to executives through comprehensive reporting.

Read full review

VishalSingh11

Director BPM at a marketing services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Has resources management and timesheets but could be more flexible

Compared to Broadcom Clarity, there was some flexibility with blueprints, etc. You can create a blueprint for different business groups or different customers. Planview AdaptiveWork doesn't have something like that. If they can build up something like a view price. It's still a traditional way where you have to create different instances for different customers. The PPM solution uses queries if I'm rolling out for different divisions. In that case, I have to create different instances for each region because each division may have a different look and feel. But if I have a blueprint, then it's very convenient. I can create multiple interfaces for different processes. Broadcom Clarity has some access control on those viewpoints.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I also like Workfront's integration. The solution integrates natively with other systems. It's easy to connect Workfront to any product that has a customer service database, such as a CRM or service ticket management solution."

"We are finding that AtTask is continuously breaking down the silos and facilitating cross-collaboration between groups and teams."

"The tool is very user-friendly."

"The most valuable feature of Adobe Workfront that I have found is the external lookup, which helps users to get the outputs based on the API and enables users to get region information if it was in the country based on the logic-driven key and value pair."

"Adobe Workfront is a very broad platform, and when examining its primary function, it excels at project management and collaborative work management, with flexibility that allows it to be used for many things beyond overall project management in terms of general metadata compiling."

"Reduced license costs plus reduced overall project timelines."

"Mostly, it has to do with reporting project status updates to the management team."

"Logging hours is not painful, there are several choices to input them."

More Adobe Workfront pros

"The feature that has improved our project planning the most is the ability to create custom workflows, which allows us to automate manual tasks that project managers need to perform. The collaboration feature enhances our team's productivity by allowing individuals to see the impact of their decisions on projects owned and managed by other teams."

"Clarizen's strength is reporting. Aside from reporting, I also like the ability to create customized workflow and custom actions. The workflow rules are handy. For example, you can create custom fields and dependent picklists."

"I like the project management solution. It's really nice."

"Slide Publisher has been a lifesaver for us; it saves us five to 10 hours a week."

"Clarizen Slide Publisher has helped increase transparency and communication with project stakeholders for us."

"Clarizen's reporting features have been critical."

"Provides visibility into employee utilization, progress on specific client projects and a portfolio view of all programs."

Cons

"Rather complex. Too many ways to get to the same result."

"Yes, we experienced brief downtime on a few occasions but it became a rarity."

"The solution's visualization feature could be user-friendly."

"More customization of the user interface would be nice."

"Workfront still has a lot of growing to do in the proofing and review areas of the application. Additionally, the document review process is way too clunky and needs to be streamlined."

"We were having some difficulties creating different kinds of reports and dashboards."

"Workfront works well if you are just trying to use out of the box functionality but once you try and get specific to your own business needs, it lacks in flexibility."

"Improving the efficiency of converting issues to projects is also essential; when converting issues to projects, users should remain on the same page rather than being redirected."

More Adobe Workfront cons

"I felt like the slide publisher isn't that user-friendly. I think it wasn't that easy to use or to figure out because of formatting constraints, or maybe we need to get better at understanding some of its limitations."

"If I start customizing too many things, Clarizen tends to get really slow in our environment and especially if I'm tunneled in an environment, like if I'm connected to my VPN."

"One specific area for improvement could be implementing a development environment to test workflows with live production data."

"It could be more user-friendly. I think it is too overwhelming, initially, in terms of possibilities and so on."

"Have struggled with reporting and user adoption."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are partners with Adobe, so we get the licensing at a cheaper rate."

"The pricing is a barrier to implementation. It is expensive compared to other competitors. Speaking about licensing, they have a private manager license for $1000, which you can use for administration as well. Then they offer a worker license for $500, and then a reviewer or contributor license which is free."

"Adobe purchased Workfront in the past year, and they're putting work into developing the platform, so I expect the price to rise. It isn't cheap, but it's reasonable for the value it provides. It isn't Monday.com where you pick a license with a set price, and you've got a project manager."

"Adobe Workfront is an expensive solution."

"Speaking about pricing, I wouldn't recommend it to a smaller company because I do think the price point is higher than other solutions that can work."

"The pricing of Workfront is completely license based."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Management Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Healthcare Company

11%

Construction Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	30

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Workfront?

The per-user cost in the ultimate plan of Adobe Workfront is approximately $1,232 when purchasing 800 to 1,000 licenses. The ultimate plan includes Fusion, which is an excellent automation tool. In...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Workfront?

The platform could benefit from additional customization features. The external lookup field, which allows custom API calls to fill data, is limited to two thousand results, which is insufficient f...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Workfront?

We specifically implement Adobe Workfront for other clients as Deloitte is a partner of Adobe. We work with different clients to implement Workfront and streamline marketing resource management wit...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Jira vs Adobe Workfront

Compared 6% of the time

Wrike vs Adobe Workfront

Compared 5% of the time

Asana vs Adobe Workfront

Compared 5% of the time

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management vs Adobe Workfront

Compared 5% of the time

Broadcom Clarity vs Adobe Workfront

Compared 4% of the time

More Adobe Workfront Competitors

Broadcom Clarity vs Planview AdaptiveWork

Compared 8% of the time

Planview PPM Pro vs Planview AdaptiveWork

Compared 6% of the time

Asana vs Planview AdaptiveWork

Compared 5% of the time

Semantic Space Technologies PPM Studio vs Planview AdaptiveWork

Compared 5% of the time

Planview Portfolios vs Planview AdaptiveWork

Compared 4% of the time

More Planview AdaptiveWork Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Adobe Workfront

September 2026

Download Adobe Workfront product report

Buyer's Guide

Planview AdaptiveWork

September 2026

Download Planview AdaptiveWork product report

Also Known As

AtTask, Workfront DAM

Planview Clarizen

Overview

Adobe Workfront provides customizable tools for project management, including dashboards and reports, promoting efficient workflows and team collaboration.

Adobe Workfront supports organizations with features like real-time data access, creative tool integration, and automated processes. It facilitates resource allocation and project tracking with role-based access control, making it a versatile platform for diverse methodologies. While its interface is user-friendly, some areas like reporting and custom fields could use simplification and faster system scalability.

What are Adobe Workfront's key features?

Customizable dashboards and reports: Facilitate data-driven decision-making with personalized insights.
Workflows and automation capabilities: Streamline processes and enhance productivity with Fusion.
Integration with creative tools: Seamlessly connect with CRM and DAM for synchronized operations.
Secure role-based access: Protect sensitive data while ensuring appropriate access levels.

What benefits or ROI should users expect from Adobe Workfront?

Improved project efficiency: Optimize resource planning and task management.
Enhanced collaboration: Ensure smooth communication within distributed teams.
Centralized project tracking: Maintain clear visibility on campaign progress and performance.
Streamlined approval processes: Reduce bottlenecks with automated workflows.

In marketing, Adobe Workfront is implemented for managing project timelines and resources, integrating with CRM and DAM tools. Companies streamline workflows to improve campaign planning and performance. By utilizing agile methodologies, they maintain a centralized hub for tracking and collaboration, enabling more efficient project completion.

Adobe

Planview AdaptiveWork enhances project and resource management through customizable reports and streamlined workflows. Offering transparency and time-saving benefits, it facilitates efficient decision-making with effective management of key metrics and visualizations.

Planview AdaptiveWork is sought after for its comprehensive project and resource management capabilities, offering detailed portfolio visibility and employee utilization tracking. Organizations find value in its reporting features, including customizable dashboards and the Slide Publisher, which streamline presentations and enhance transparency. Automated workflows and collaboration tools reduce manual effort, boosting productivity. However, it lacks the flexibility of competitors like Broadcom Clarity, particularly in catering to diverse business needs. Some users find the interface less intuitive and certain features, such as schedule management and partial automation, pose challenges.

What are the main features of Planview AdaptiveWork?

Project and Resource Management: Enables effective tracking and utilization.
Customizable Dashboards: Enhances insight and transparency in reporting.
Slide Publisher: Simplifies the creation of presentation assets.
Automated Workflows: Increases efficiency by reducing manual tasks.
Integration Capabilities: Connects with other tools to streamline operations.

What benefits or ROI should users consider?

Improved Decision-Making: Efficiently manages key metrics and visualizations.
Time Savings: Automated features reduce the time spent on routine tasks.
Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates better teamwork through integrated tools.
Transparency: Offers comprehensive views of project portfolios and resources.
Adaptability: Serves various team needs beyond project management.

Planview AdaptiveWork is implemented in sectors focusing on program and portfolio management, proving essential in tracking timesheets and finances with multiple rate cards. It integrates financial data into project plans for accurate forecasting and supports teams with custom workflows for ongoing maintenance. Additionally, it adapts to deliverable tracking and reporting, serving as a robust content repository or library, catering to diverse team requirements in industries beyond conventional project management.

Planview

Sample Customers

Advance Autoparts, Emerson, Covario, Cisco, Caroma, TREK, Sapient Nitro, ATB, LexisNexis, CarPhone Warehouse

Cisco Capital, JLL, Conagra Brands, Cargill, JLL, IBM, IIROC, Siemens Energy

Buyer's Guide

Adobe Workfront vs. Planview AdaptiveWork

September 2026

Free Report: Adobe Workfront vs. Planview AdaptiveWork

Find out what your peers are saying about Adobe Workfront vs. Planview AdaptiveWork and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Adobe Workfront vs. Planview AdaptiveWork report.

See our list of best Project Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.