

Acunetix and SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security both operate within the cybersecurity domain, each offering distinct capabilities. SentinelOne generally appears to have an edge in real-time detection and integrated threat management.
Features: Acunetix offers web-based vulnerability scanning, the ability to schedule scans, and detailed reports with low false positives. It is user-friendly for testing teams, facilitating automated scanning and remediation. SentinelOne provides real-time detection and automated remediation capabilities, with a strong integrated environment for threat identification and mitigation.
Room for Improvement: Acunetix needs enhancements in its Interactive Application Security Testing module, updated database versions, and expanded authentication options. Users request fewer false positives and a more flexible licensing model. SentinelOne users seek improvements in reducing resource intensity and false positives. They also desire better integration with third-party tools and improved alert management.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acunetix offers flexibility with both on-premises and hybrid cloud setups, though user satisfaction with tech support varies, citing delays and limited knowledge in some cases. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud is primarily used in public cloud settings with reports of good support responsiveness but an average response time. Both could enhance their support during critical times.
Pricing and ROI: Acunetix has experienced criticism due to price increases, influencing perceived value despite effective security benefits. Users find its evolving pricing structures challenging for renewal decisions. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud is mostly considered competitively priced, offering good value with scalable options. Both offer ROI, but satisfaction levels depend on organizational use and needs.
It saves a significant amount of time by covering attack surfaces.
I have seen a return on investment, as Acunetix helps reduce the man-days and effort needed for scanning bulk applications through automated assessments.
The detailed information PingSafe gives about how to fix vulnerabilities reduces the time spent on remediation by about 70 to 80 percent.
After implementing SentinelOne, it takes about five to seven minutes.
Our ability to get in and review our vulnerability stance, whether daily, monthly, weekly, or whatever it might be, has drastically improved over our prior provider.
For high-severity issues, they reach out within two to three hours, and for critical issues, a response is received within 15 minutes.
The technical support from Invicti is very good and fast.
Support staff not being familiar with the problem.
When we send an email, they respond quickly and proactively provide solutions.
They took direct responsibility for the system and could solve queries quickly.
Having a reliable team ready and willing to assist with any issues is essential.
Acunetix can handle increasing workloads and more applications easily.
I would rate the scalability of PingSafe 10 out of 10.
The SentinelOne Singularity Cloud exhibits high scalability.
We've automated in our MDM so any device that we start in our MDM automatically installs SentinelOne.
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud is incredibly reliable.
I would rate it a ten out of ten for stability.
As a security tool, our primary focus is on the results it delivers, rather than the aesthetics of the dashboards themselves.
The main concern is related to false positives; Acunetix needs to work on identifying valid and invalid findings.
I could supply it with maybe a Swagger file or a JSON file, and Acunetix would pick it up, scan all the endpoints according to the OWASP Top Ten, and give me remediation and actionable remediation reports.
Acunetix should have better integration with newer tools such as GitHub and Azure DevOps.
I would also like to see Cloud Native Security offer APIs that allow us to directly build dashboards within the platform.
Detection should be in near real-time.
If notifications are available, then it will be more helpful, easy, and time-saving.
The pricing cost is affordable for small and mid-sized organizations, and when compared to Checkmarx, it is significantly affordable, as Checkmarx is quite expensive.
We secured a special licensing model for penetration testing companies, which is cost-effective.
The pricing of Acunetix is pretty expensive and could be improved.
With very little negotiation involved, we just let them know what we could pay and they were willing to meet us at slightly above what we paid with Sophos, which was still very fair for what we were looking at.
I recall Cloud Native Security charging a slightly higher premium previously.
This would have been a poor return on investment, especially considering Wiz's high cost.
Its most valuable role is in enhancing security by identifying potential vulnerabilities efficiently.
The solution is excellent at detecting SQL injection and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities.
The best feature Acunetix offers is the centralized dashboard and the quality of reports it generates, which includes various options for selecting reports and developer options for directly sharing the reports with developers.
Cloud Native Security's cloud SIEM feature has been essential in preventing our most critical security incidents.
The cloud misconfiguration feature gave us almost zero false positives.
PingSafe proactively detects and alerts us to such accidental exposures of sensitive information, including SaaS credentials.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security | 2.4% |
| Acunetix | 1.1% |
| Other | 96.5% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 15 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 18 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 49 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 22 |
| Large Enterprise | 55 |
Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner is an automated web application security testing tool that audits your web applications by checking for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross site scripting, and other exploitable vulnerabilities.
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security offers a streamlined approach to cloud security with intuitive operation and strong integration capabilities for heightened threat detection and remediation efficiency.
Singularity Cloud Security stands out for its real-time detection and response, effectively minimizing detection and remediation timelines. Its automated remediation integrates smoothly with third-party tools enhancing operational efficiency. The comprehensive console ensures visibility and support for forensic investigations. Seamless platform integration and robust support for innovation are notable advantages. Areas for development include improved search functionality, affordability, better firewall capabilities for remote users, stable agents, comprehensive reporting, and efficient third-party integrations. Clarity in the interface, responsive support, and real-time alerting need enhancement, with a call for more automation and customization. Better scalability and cost-effective integration without compromising capabilities are desired.
What are SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security's standout features?
What benefits should users expect from SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security?
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is deployed in industries needing robust cloud security posture management, endpoint protection, and threat hunting. Utilized frequently across AWS and Azure, it assists in monitoring, threat detection, and maintaining compliance in diverse environments while providing real-time alerts and recommendations for proactive threat management.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.