Actian Ingres vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Actian and Broadcom are both solutions in the Data Warehouse category. Actian is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.0, while Broadcom is ranked #5 with an average rating of 9.0. Actian holds a 2.5% mindshare in Data Warehouse, compared to Broadcom’s 5.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Actian users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Actian Ingres

Read 2 Actian Ingres reviews

2,687 Views
1,075 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Read 89 VMware Tanzu Data Solutions reviews

11,056 Views
3,648 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Actian Ingres

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions and Actian Ingres are competing products in the data management category. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions seems to hold the upper hand due to its strong pricing and support, while Actian Ingres is noted for its advanced features.

Features: VMware Tanzu Data Solutions offers comprehensive integration with cloud environments, along with modern data service capabilities and efficient resource management. Actian Ingres is known for its robust scalability, performance optimization, and efficient handling of data-intensive applications.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: VMware Tanzu Data Solutions provides flexible deployment options and strong customer support, making implementation seamless. Actian Ingres features a straightforward deployment model but faces initial support challenges, indicating potential areas for improvement in customer service.

Pricing and ROI: VMware Tanzu Data Solutions involves a higher initial setup cost but promises long-term ROI due to its cloud efficiencies. Actian Ingres offers more cost-effective initial pricing, appealing to budget-conscious buyers, though it may require additional investment for performance tuning to achieve maximum ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Actian Ingres vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Actian Ingres vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Actian Ingres

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

28th

Ranking in Data Warehouse

17th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

11th

Ranking in Data Warehouse

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Database Development and Management (5th), Message Queue (MQ) Software (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Data Warehouse category, the mindshare of Actian Ingres is 2.5%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware Tanzu Data Solutions is 5.0%, up from 3.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Warehouse Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
VMware Tanzu Data Solutions	5.0%
Actian Ingres	2.5%
Other	92.5%

Data Warehouse

Featured Reviews

GustavHoltzhausen

Sr Sales Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Reliable performance enhances operations with good technical support

We run the entire IRS system, the income system, and the tax system. We also manage the entire Absa banking system in Africa. There's a lot of database applications, similar to those used in banks and the IRS The most valuable features for us are reliability and performance. Our system is used…

Read full review

Karthik Shivaram

Technical Director at STI INFOTECH PVT LTD

Improved multi-cloud data management has simplified operations and supports seamless Kubernetes

From my perspective, the biggest challenge with VMware right now is the pricing. To be very honest, in many cases I find myself recommending alternative solutions instead of VMware. Even if those alternatives come with a bit more complexity, customers are often more willing to accept that than the current VMware pricing model. In the past, VMware used a socket-based licensing model, which was easier for customers to understand and budget for. Now the shift to a core-based licensing model has significantly increased costs for many environments, especially for organizations running modern high-core CPUs. One positive aspect of the new model is that VMware has bundled several components together. For example, earlier when deploying vSphere, customers also had to purchase vCenter separately for management. Now multiple components are packaged into a single SKU, which simplifies some aspects of procurement and deployment. While this consolidation has its benefits, the overall licensing and commercial costs remain very high. Pricing is not the only issue. I believe Broadcom also needs to reconsider its strategy in light of the current market conditions. The approach they are taking may be strategic from a business perspective, but from what I see in the field, it is leading to lost opportunities. Many customers who previously relied on VMware are now actively exploring alternative virtualization platforms. I’m not sure where this direction will ultimately lead, but based on my experience, it is already affecting adoption. Since you’ve been trying to reach me for some time—and we also had a discussion a couple of years ago—I hope this feedback helps Broadcom understand the current sentiment in the market and potentially make adjustments. Another important concern is the way features are bundled. In many cases, customers only need basic virtualization and high availability capabilities. However, the current packaging often includes additional features that they may not need. A good analogy is that if a customer only needs an entry-level car, we shouldn’t be forced to sell them a Rolls-Royce. VMware could benefit from adopting a more modular or à la carte licensing model, where customers can choose only the components they truly require. For example, if a customer only needs core virtualization functionality, they should be able to purchase just that. This would allow partners and solution providers to better align solutions with customer requirements and position VMware more competitively in the market. Another challenge I want to highlight is the pricing model based on U.S. dollars and the way multi-year licensing is handled. In many enterprise and government projects, customers prefer to commit to three-year or five-year licenses and pay the full amount upfront. However, in approximately 20% of the deals I work on, we lose opportunities because VMware only provides dollar-based pricing for the first year. When it comes to the following years, the contract requires renewals annually rather than allowing a fixed multi-year upfront payment. This approach is particularly problematic for government and public sector customers. Many of them are ready and willing to pay for three or five years in advance, but the current VMware model does not support that structure effectively. Because pricing is tied to the U.S. dollar and subject to yearly adjustments, VMware does not lock in pricing for the full term. From a customer’s perspective, this introduces uncertainty and makes procurement more complicated. Ideally, if a price is quoted—for example, $100 per year—it should remain consistent across a multi-year agreement. Customers would be comfortable committing to a five-year term if the price were fixed and predictable. Unfortunately, that flexibility is currently not available across VMware products, whether it is vSphere, VMware Tanzu solutions, or other offerings. For large enterprise environments, one-year commitments are usually not practical. Many enterprise customers prefer longer-term agreements for budgeting and procurement reasons. Even when they are willing to accept the higher cost associated with the core-based licensing model, the lack of a clear multi-year upfront option often becomes a deal-breaker.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The deployment of our solution across a number of servers using Ingres .NET has meant that we can protect the database server behind a highly secure firewall and deploy the front end solutions on a normal web server."

"Ingres is the only database solution that has maintained a level of consistency and integrity about the way users interact with it."

"The most valuable features for us are reliability and performance."

"I like the high throughput of 20K messages/sec, and that it supports multiple protocols."

"Before we had Oracle Exadata, some queries would take more than 20 hours of execution, and with Greenplum, it takes a few minutes."

"We have been using GemFire for a Telco project, which we need process network data in real time and meanwhile access some reference data, and GemFire has done a great job, as we have managed to process over 200,000 messages per second."

"The solution improved our site reliability."

"With VMware Tanzu Greenplum, one can make a huge database table and analyze the queries by adding in the SQL command. Some hint or command for the query goes over the multi-parallel execution."

"Scalable (Massive) Parallel Processing (MPP) – The ability to bring to bear large amounts of compute against large data sets with Greenplum and the EMC DCA has proven itself to be very effective."

"It can be configured to be a very fast message broker. I like the stability, the built-in admin tools and plugin architecture."

"The reports are running very fast, a matter of minutes instead of hours as it was previously."

Cons

"The ability to reset the log file without stopping the DBMS would be helpful for us."

"The seamless integration is a bit of an issue."

"The fact GreenPlum is using an older version of Postgres means developers coming from other products will find many missing features in PostgreSQL, features which you would assume are standard."

"I would like to see better documentation on how to set up complex webs of RabbitMQ servers — master/slave, multi-master, etc."

"Maintenance is time-consuming."

"RabbitMQ is clearly better supported on Linux than it is on Windows. There are idiosyncrasies in the Windows version that are not there on Linux."

"In build monitoring, the interface could be improved."

"There are a lot of areas that can be improved. The bug fixes come as many patches like a start up instead of having scheduled release with proper improvements."

"The product needs to focus on offering more use case documentation because browsing the internet to find it can be a process filled with struggles."

"I saw some limitation with respect to the column store, and removing this would be an improvement."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It is the best product with best fit for price/performance customer objectives."

"Since the tool is an open-source product, there is no need to pay anything."

"Pricing is good compared to other products. It's fine."

"are using the open-source version, which can be used free of cost."

"We are using the open-source version of this solution."

"It is an open-source platform. Although, we have to pay for additional features."

"The price is pretty good."

"This is an open source solution."

More VMware Tanzu Data Solutions pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Warehouse solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

14%

Construction Company

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

17%

Construction Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	32
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	52

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Actian Ingres?

The seamless integration is a bit of an issue. I would like to see more direct connectors and stuff like SQLAlchemy. It's there but isn't available as a standard, so it involves going to GitHub to ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Actian Ingres?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Actian Ingres?

Initially, it's a lot less expensive than competitors. Price performance has always been a priority, ensuring we remain competitive in the market.

See all answers

How does IBM MQ compare with VMware RabbitMQ?

IBM MQ has a great reputation behind it, and this solution is very robust with great stability. It is easy to use, simple to configure and integrates well with our enterprise ecosystem and protocol...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware Tanzu GemFire?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for VMware Tanzu Data Solutions is that it is a bit expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with VMware Tanzu GemFire?

In terms of weak points in VMware Tanzu Data Solutions, pricing is always the root cause of people not wanting to renew licenses or do any upgrades.

See all answers

Comparisons

SQL Server vs Actian Ingres

Compared 8% of the time

Snowflake vs Actian Ingres

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle Database Appliance vs Actian Ingres

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle Database vs Actian Ingres

Compared 6% of the time

Teradata vs Actian Ingres

Compared 6% of the time

More Actian Ingres Competitors

Teradata vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 4% of the time

IBM MQ vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 4% of the time

ActiveMQ vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 4% of the time

Nutanix Database Service vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 4% of the time

Snowflake vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 3% of the time

More VMware Tanzu Data Solutions Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Warehouse

September 2026

Download Actian Ingres product report

Buyer's Guide

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

August 2026

Download VMware Tanzu Data Solutions product report

Also Known As

Ingres, Ingres 2006

Greenplum, Pivotal Greenplum, VMware RabbitMQ, VMware Tanzu GemFire, VMware Postgres

Overview

Actian Ingres is a robust database management system tailored for mission-critical applications, known for its scalability and reliability. It supports various industries, offering seamless data management and integration capabilities.

Actian Ingres serves as a comprehensive database solution designed for enterprises that require high performance and reliability. With advanced data management features, Ingres is ideal for businesses of all sizes in need of efficient data handling and integration. Users appreciate its capability to handle complex queries, support for multiple platforms, and ability to integrate seamlessly with other applications. This makes it a go-to choice for organizations looking for cost-effective scalability and reliability in database management.

What are the most important features of Actian Ingres?

Scalability: Easily handles large volumes of data, making it suitable for growing businesses.
Cross-Platform Support: Offers compatibility across multiple operating systems, enhancing flexibility.
High Availability: Ensures minimal downtime with robust data recovery options.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly connects with other systems, allowing for streamlined operations.
Efficient Query Management: Optimizes complex queries for better performance and speed.

What benefits or ROI can users expect from Actian Ingres?

Cost Efficiency: Offers a competitive pricing structure that reduces total ownership costs.
Improved Performance: Delivers fast query processing, enhancing productivity.
Reliability: Provides consistent performance, which is crucial for mission-critical applications.
Scalability: Supports business growth with minimal additional investment.

Actian Ingres has found wide application across industries such as finance, healthcare, and telecommunications due to its reliability and integration capabilities. In the healthcare sector, it supports the management of patient data with high security and efficiency. In finance, it aids in handling transactional data and analytics, while in telecommunications, it ensures seamless data flow and processing. Businesses in these sectors value its flexibility and robust data management features, allowing for customized solutions to meet industry-specific requirements.

Actian

VMware Tanzu is a robust platform tailored for data warehousing, complex analytics, BI applications, and predictive analytics. It excels in scalability, performance, and parallel processing, enhancing data handling efficiency. Users report significant productivity improvements and streamlined operations, making it ideal for comprehensive data solutions.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Groupe Adeo, IsCool Entertainment

General Electric, Conversant, China CITIC Bank, Aridhia, Purdue University

Buyer's Guide

Actian Ingres vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

September 2026

Free Report: Actian Ingres vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Find out what your peers are saying about Actian Ingres vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Actian Ingres vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions report.

See our list of best Data Warehouse vendors and best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Data Warehouse reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.