

Acronis Cyber Protect and HPE Zerto Software are strong contenders in the data protection and disaster recovery category. HPE Zerto Software seems to have the upper hand in disaster recovery efficiency, especially with its near-zero RPO and seamless VM replication, which is more favorable for those requiring high-level disaster recovery solutions.
Features: Acronis Cyber Protect offers robust data backup and recovery capabilities with support for cloning, incremental, full, and differential backups. It also provides data synchronization and secure online backups along with integrated anti-ransomware features. HPE Zerto Software provides near-zero RPO and continuous data protection, making it ideal for minimizing downtime. It facilitates seamless migrations and efficient VM replication across data centers and cloud platforms.
Room for Improvement: Users of Acronis Cyber Protect point out installation complexity, an outdated interface, and resource-heavy operations as areas for enhancement. There's also a need for improved integration and documentation. HPE Zerto Software could benefit from enhancing its backup capabilities, offering better licensing flexibility, and streamlining support. Users call for more automated processes and more comprehensive reporting features to enhance its offering.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acronis Cyber Protect supports environments across hybrid cloud, public cloud, and on-premises, with mixed reviews regarding customer service. Complex issues often require escalation and support is not always available in real-time. HPE Zerto Software is noted for its straightforward deployment and appliance option, though the learning curve can be steep. Improved customer service responsiveness is needed, despite the product being easier to set up.
Pricing and ROI: Acronis Cyber Protect provides various licensing options, including perpetual licenses, with a flexible pricing model beneficial for SMBs. However, the complexity of pricing options is mentioned, and the reseller model lacks cost advantages. HPE Zerto Software is generally seen as more expensive but is justified by its reliable disaster recovery capabilities. A per-VM licensing model is available, although it is considered inflexible by some. Its robust performance in reducing downtime offers a strong ROI for critical operations.
My customers see value in money and ROI with Acronis Cyber Protect, so they purchase it.
Before, it was a huge cost. It was several thousand dollars to do a DR test, whereas now, I click a button.
It saves us a lot of time and gives us the ability to perform other DR plans for other systems.
It's not only in the cloud; it's DR as a service, which means that the recovery operations are performed by a dedicated team specializing in this area.
Whenever I have a question, they respond very quickly each time.
I'll give them a nine for how responsive they are in technical support.
The support takes too much time to respond to callbacks.
I have never had an issue that was not resolved, and I have never been in a situation where they did not respond.
I would give them a rating of ten because it represents the highest level of support based on the technical knowledge of the support team, response time, and effectiveness of the provided resolutions.
When I open a ticket, I usually get a call within an hour or two.
Acronis Cyber Protect is a scalable product.
I would rate it eight on a scale from 1 to 10 for scalability, considering it will be multiple assets.
I would rate it a ten out of ten for scalability.
Customers need to follow good engineering practices for optimal product use.
By adding more hosts and installing VRAs on each, tasks can be efficiently managed.
It ended up being at a point where we actually had to disable some features in order for the client to work through that specific purpose.
The stability of Acronis Cyber Protect is very high.
I promptly delete the malfunctioning elements and set them up again to resume replication, ensuring stability.
The ease of use was so good with Zerto that they were able to migrate things much quicker.
It is very reliable.
It's only after we discovered there was a compatibility issue with the application that the client was running that we actually had to do a lot of log file shipping to Acronis themselves and getting solutions because of other problems.
Having something such as a community for peer-to-peer interaction would be a valuable asset.
The Protect environment should automatically secure the last backup screens to prevent any changes, even by an admin.
If I have 350 objects that I am protecting, I would like Zerto to be able to fire them up in one order, rather than having to manually bring them up in a sequence.
If the host has a lot of VMs on it, there may not always be enough time to relocate all of the VMs from a protection group standpoint to other hosts before the replication appliance that Zerto uses to manage that powers itself down.
If HPE Zerto Software has it built-in where we're going to vCenter and you click on it, it will build the VPG and indicate configuration requirements, that would be amazing.
I would rate the price as nine out of ten.
If you want a good-quality tool that is robust and does a good job for you, you have to pay a higher price to get that, and Zerto is no different.
However, it can become quite expensive when you start looking at the number of workloads you have in the environment and what you would like to do.
Zerto is easier to set up and use, and it's less expensive.
The biggest benefit of Acronis Cyber Protect for my customers is that it is a great asset to protect business data and ensure data is in a secure Vault.
The NASDAQ level CFS level backup is the feature I find most beneficial for our data protection strategy.
This is beneficial because any backup package stored in the cloud is not free, and if it shrinks well, it allows users to pay less for cloud storage.
Zerto offers excellent technical support with responsive and helpful experts.
If we were attacked, I could revert to a backup from five seconds before the attack, and no one would know we were attacked.
The replication time and the minor amount of time it takes to sync a new server outside of any of my huge 40-terabyte boxes is ridiculously quick.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| HPE Zerto Software | 2.1% |
| Acronis Cyber Protect | 2.8% |
| Other | 95.1% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 67 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 15 |
| Large Enterprise | 23 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 92 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 86 |
| Large Enterprise | 194 |
Zerto is used for disaster recovery, business continuity, data migration, and ransomware recovery, providing continuous data protection and near real-time replication. Valued for ease of use, efficient failover processes, and versatile integration, it enhances organizational efficiency, reduces errors, and boosts productivity.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.