No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

ACF2 vs IBM Resource Access Control Facility vs IBM Security zSecure comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Mainframe Security category, the mindshare of ACF2 is 11.8%, up from 9.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Resource Access Control Facility is 12.3%, down from 14.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Security zSecure is 16.3%, down from 27.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Mainframe Security Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
IBM Security zSecure16.3%
IBM Resource Access Control Facility12.3%
ACF211.8%
Other59.599999999999994%
Mainframe Security
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1077621 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Examiner at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
A reliable, scalable product for security and auditing of our mainframe environment
It is a good product. It has been used for years. As long as it is configured correctly, it is a very stable product. It depends on how an institution or a company configures it. It depends on an institution's risk appetite. You need to make sure it is configured as per the concept of least privilege, and the logging features, detection and control mechanism, and other things like that are enabled. If you configure it to give access to the public, then there could be compromises. You should also have someone who independently checks it to make sure that it is configured keeping security in mind. If it has been configured for a while, when there are enhancements to the product or when you enhance it, you need to make sure that security is also looked at, and it is configured according to an institution's security policies. I would rate it a nine out of 10.
KC
Senior systems engineer at Unum
We're able to do role-based security so when new people join the company we're able to quickly add them to the proper security through role-based security groups.
It's completely secure. That's the best answer I can give you. We're able to do role-based security so when new people join the company we're able to quickly add them to the proper security through role-based security groups. Our resources are secured with this product I would welcome something…
it_user635553 - PeerSpot reviewer
Mainframe Systems Programmer with 51-200 employees
Provides administration of the RACF database. We can identify and remove old security database records.
* The zSecure Admin provides us with a much more user-friendly administration of the RACF database. * TopSecret and ACF2 are also supported (if they were ordered). * The Database Cleanup utility feature: Used for identifying and removing old security database records that are no longer relevant or being used.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is a good product."
"I love their support. The support is great. They are number one."
"Know that this tool is a great tool, a good tool to use, because you can quickly automate, quickly provision, and deprovision new users, which is essential when you are bringing new people onboard."
"By providing a high level of access control to the z/OS systems, ACF2 allows us to maintain tight controls on dataset and system access and helps us keep unauthorized users from accessing PHI or PII data."
"We use this tool to quickly assign privileges to different users as soon as they come in."
"Excellent real-time reporting that saves time and resources."
"I am deeply impressed with the quality and depth and breadth of security and functionality in CA’s ACF2 and Top Secret products."
"The most valuable feature is strict and reliable access control to CICS Resources."
"Perfectly integrated with the z/OS operating system and all the other products in the IBM z/OS family."
"Technical support is exceptional."
"It's completely secure."
"The productivity and consistency in our organization has been improved by the ability to easily generate reports and a common interface for the security administrators."
"Technical support is optimal."
"The zSecure Admin provides us with a much more user-friendly administration of the RACF database."
 

Cons

"They can work on its ability to work in a distributed environment. It's a mainframe product. As many companies move to the cloud, depending on what cloud models they choose, such as a public, hybrid, or private cloud, it should be deployable. I am not sure if it can be deployed on those platforms. It has been there since the '50s or '60s, and it's still scalable. It has survived all these years, and it's scalable to many platforms, but I don't know about the cloud."
"Reporting can sometimes include false positives."
"They can work on its ability to work in a distributed environment."
"The user access review could also be improved. It produces a lot of false positives."
"It needs longer rules. The max rule is 32K."
"I would like my team and me to be able to use simple browsers, like Chrome, to be able to access mainframe data and provision users using the browser."
"It needs longer rules. The max rule is 32K."
"Initial setup could be complex if you rely on contractors to help with implementation."
"I would welcome something that is more easily integrated with distributor platforms."
"I would like the generation of RACF on-screen listings and reports to be more flexible."
"The way to pull security logs could be better."
"I would like to see improvements in the certification (SSL). It must be less complicated."
"There should be more supplied reports and CARLa samples."
"The reporting feature needs to improve."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mainframe Security solutions are best for your needs.
885,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
18%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Insurance Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
26%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Healthcare Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
20%
Computer Software Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Insurance Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise4
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
How does IBM Security zSecure handle encryption and secure transmission of data?
zSecure, a suite of products, simplifies security management on z/OS and z/VM with an intuitive interface, surpassing...
 

Also Known As

CA ACF2
IBM RACF
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Sky, Rogers Communications
Information Not Available
Swiss Re
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, IBM, Broadcom and others in Mainframe Security. Updated: March 2026.
885,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.