Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] Logo

CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] Reviews

Vendor: Broadcom
3.9 out of 5
Leave a review

What is CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL]?

CA Access Control provides tools to protect your system in both ways against unauthorized use of computer resources: block unauthorized users from accessing the system and block authorized users from accessing items to which they should not have access. CA Access Control also provides auditing tools that let you trace users' activities to track attempted misuse of the computer system.
Get the Privileged Access Management (PAM) Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL], CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and more!
Buyer's Guide
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
March 2026
Get the category report
Helped 885,264 peers since 2012

Featured CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] reviews

Read more reviews
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Mar 25, 2026

Valuable Features

  • "It gives us the ability to track who is using what ID and for what purpose."
  • "We're happy to see it working so well with our IBM solution, saving us time and costs."
  • "No, the product been stable and robust, and boasts with new additional features."

Room for Improvement

  • "We have had problems with deployment, and we are concerned with the possibility for outages and how they can have a negative impact on the environment."
  • "The manuals for this product used to be good. We could find in one place answers to pretty much every question or situation we had. However, it's now in piece-meal fashion."
  • "Yes, I encountered lots of issues."
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our Privileged Access Management (PAM) Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Compare CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL]

CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] was previously known as CA Access Control, CA Privileged Identity Manager.

CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] customers

Colruyt Group, Logicalis, TIS Inc.

Related questions

  • 24
When evaluating Privileged Identity Management, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 66
How was the 2020 Twitter Hack carried out? Could it have been prevented?
  • 74
Which is the best Privileged Account Management solution?
  • 25
What are the top 5 PAM solutions that can be implemented which cover both hybrid and cloud?
  • 134
What are the top 5 PAM solutions?
  • 342
Which PAM tool do you prefer: CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, One Identity Safeguard, Delinea Secret Server, or BeyondTrust Privileged Remote A
  • 29
How will AI and ML help or work with PIM/PAM?
  • 20
Is BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management really expensive compared to other tools or software?
  • 417
What is the difference between PAM and PAS?
  • 177
What is the difference between IDAM , PIM and PAM?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] Logo
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL]
See all alternatives
 
CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees3.5I find the access control features valuable, and technical support is great. However, initial setup was difficult due to poor documentation, and I'd like to see 'always-on' options and improved deployment to prevent downtime concerns.
SME Mainframe Security at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees4.5I find this product secure, stable, scalable, and it integrates well, with mostly great support. However, I am disappointed that the user documentation has become poor, requiring me to piece information together now.
Senior Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees3.5Over six and a half years, I've found this solution robust and stable, offering valuable features like PUM and SIEM integration. I experienced no deployment, stability, or scalability issues, with decent customer service.
IT Security Consultant at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees3.5I've used it two years. It improved my security and compliance, with admin password management being key. Initial setup and deployment had many issues, so I recommend professional installation due to bugs.
Senior Project Manager with 501-1,000 employees4.5We've used this for over five years; it provides excellent server security, helping us exceed audit requirements. Setup was straightforward, and it's very stable. However, automated deployment failed, needing manual work. Customer service is high, though tech support is average.
Senior Consultant at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees3.5I value the security access management, though the complex setup and UI need improvement. Scalability and stability are good, but deployment can challenge existing security processes. ROI is compliance-driven, making it a unique and complex solution.
CA Access Control Administrator at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees3.5I find this security product efficiently controls privileged user access with good deployment and scalability. However, the UI needs improvement, and I sometimes encounter report generation issues. It's a pretty cool product for security.
CEO at a tech company with 51-200 employees4.0I find Access Control excellent for securing systems with authentication, information scrambling, and tracking unauthorized users. However, installation is challenging and it's expensive for small businesses, despite its reliability and support.