Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Atlassian SourceTree Logo

Atlassian SourceTree Reviews

Vendor: Atlassian
3.8 out of 5
Leave a review

What is Atlassian SourceTree?

Atlassian SourceTree is a graphical user interface (GUI) desktop client that facilitates user interaction with Git repositories. SourceTree provides a visual interface that is easy to use and intuitive. It allows developers to save a lot of command lines when working with Git.

Get the Version Control Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian SourceTree, Bitbucket, Bitbucket Server and more!
Atlassian SourceTree is the #6 ranked solution in top Version Control solutions. PeerSpot users give Atlassian SourceTree an average rating of 7.6 out of 10. Atlassian SourceTree is most commonly compared to Bitbucket: Atlassian SourceTree vs Bitbucket. Atlassian SourceTree is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 59% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a manufacturing company, accounting for 19% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
Version Control
August 2025
Get the category report
Helped 867,497 peers since 2012

Featured Atlassian SourceTree reviews

Read more reviews

Atlassian SourceTree mindshare

As of September 2025, the mindshare of Atlassian SourceTree in the Version Control category stands at 6.4%, up from 6.0% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Version Control Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Atlassian SourceTree6.4%
Bitbucket26.6%
Bitbucket Server19.9%
Other47.1%
Version Control
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Atlassian SourceTree is appreciated for its intuitive interfacing, supporting undoing specific changes, and handling file conflicts. Users find its branch management graphically appealing and value its integration with Bitbucket. It efficiently manages branches, repositories, and merges. Test summaries, automatic merges, and latency are positively highlighted. The capacity to import XML files and test suites is frequently mentioned. The graphical interface simplifies working without terminal commands, appealing to those managing multiple integrations quickly.
  • "Atlassian SourceTree is a very stable product."
  • "The tool's UI is good."
  • "For me, the branches ' graph was the most valuable feature of Atlassian SourceTree. I often used the terminal, but during a demo, my boss preferred I not switch to the terminal view. SourceTree's graphical interface for managing branches was handy for that. The demo involved making changes, committing them, pushing to the CI/CD tool, running the pipeline, and seeing the integration, all within about twenty minutes."

Room for Improvement

Improvements needed for Atlassian SourceTree include enhancing the console to allow more shortcuts, such as dragging files to it. Users suggest creating folders for organizing branches and stashes. The interface needs better accessibility as it can be complex for new programmers. Many prefer the command line for ease and cost-efficiency. Enhancing message display and integrating functionalities like Visual Studio for addressing merge conflicts would improve user experience.
  • "People think that Visual Studio Code is more intuitive and can serve dual purposes for development and as a client to push or pull code."
  • "The visuals, including the UI and UX, have simple fonts, making it an area where certain enhancements can be done."
  • "The product's UI needs improvement."

ROI

Users reported significant improvements in efficiency and workflow management with Atlassian SourceTree. They found it streamlined their version control processes, leading to faster project completions and reduced errors. Teams experienced enhanced collaboration, which boosted productivity. The intuitive interface and powerful features of Atlassian SourceTree contributed to increased developer output and faster problem-solving. Decreased time spent on version control resulted in noticeable cost savings for many organizations.

Pricing

Enterprise users generally find Atlassian SourceTree to be a free application, with some indicating a fee exists. SourceTree is often included as part of Atlassian's broader suite offerings, which are seen as affordable. Some users perceive both SourceTree and alternatives like Visual Studio Code as open-source solutions with no associated costs.
  • "I do not recall the exact pricing details for SourceTree, but generally, Atlassian products are affordable, and SourceTree typically comes as part of a suite."
  • "Atlassian SourceTree is a free solution."
  • "There is a fee for using SourceTree."

Popular Use Cases

Users primarily employ Atlassian SourceTree for repairing broken Git repositories, managing source code across different environments, and interfacing with Bitbucket. It provides an intuitive interface for tasks like code check-ins, check-outs, merges, and branch creation, offering visibility into integrations with tools like Jira, GitLab, and GitHub. Rather than the command line, some prefer its user-friendly interface to perform repository management more efficiently.

Service and Support

Many users find Atlassian SourceTree's customer service responsive and helpful. However, some users report slow response times and a lack of detailed solutions. There is praise for the support documentation and online resources, which many find comprehensive and easy to understand. Users appreciate the community forums for additional support, but a few express frustration with the complexity of getting personalized help.

Deployment

Atlassian SourceTree's initial setup is frequently described as easy and straightforward. Installation usually involves a simple next, next, next process. In a development setting, deployment is a simple push-and-pull process. Some users note it takes about an hour and involves three to four technicians, yet despite this, many users rate the process very high in terms of ease. Installation typically occurs through an .exe file, making it accessible for users.

Scalability

Atlassian SourceTree is seen as scalable, although some believe it lags behind alternatives like GitKraken in terms of scaling ease. While many organizations implement it across various teams for issue resolution and routine developer tasks, others find scalability depends on individual machine installations. Around 40% of development teams opt for SourceTree, with some large firms trusting it widely. Despite its perceived limitations, it remains favored by numerous users.

Stability

Many experienced no issues with Atlassian SourceTree and found it stable. Users reported no bugs or crashes. Stability is solid, with no lags experienced since its introduction in their careers. SourceTree has been widely used since 2012 without stability problems.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our Version Control Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise4
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business26
Midsize Enterprise19
Large Enterprise64
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
19%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
14%
University
6%
Comms Service Provider
5%
Educational Organization
5%
Retailer
4%
Construction Company
3%
Media Company
3%
Insurance Company
3%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Engineering Company
2%
Government
2%
Healthcare Company
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
Non Profit
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Performing Arts
1%
Real Estate/Law Firm
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
Museum Or Institution
1%
Legal Firm
1%
Agriculture
1%

Compare Atlassian SourceTree with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about Atlassian SourceTree

The tool is free and works as a Git client for Windows and Mac OS. You can visualize and manage your repositories via the simple GUI. The client offers an efficient and consistent development process for Git and Mercurial.

Atlassian SourceTree Key Features

  • Branch management: Typically, managing branches is a time-consuming and tedious process for project managers and developers. With SourceTree, you can switch working copies with a single click. You can also see where you are compared with the version in the repository, alerting you to push or pull.

  • Working copy: Developers who work using the command line often lack visibility. Access the “working copy” section to see the difference between your local copy and the version in the Git repository. This feature allows you to see exactly what has changed.

  • Branch history: the History section displays the full history of the branch, displaying each commit and file change. This feature enables smooth version control.

  • GitFlow: GitFlow organizes the workflow, streamlining parallel code changes and reducing merge conflicts.

Atlassian SourceTree Benefits

  • Any level user can use SourceTree: beginners and experts benefit from the visibility and streamlined workflows of SourceTree. Beginners benefit from the simplified version control. Experts can review changesets and stash and pick between branches. Senior programmers can customize changeset and stashes, apply patches, rebase or shelve changesets. The tool offers detailed tutorials to help beginners and experts start quickly. Other benefits for beginners include easy access to commands with one click and simplified distributed version control.

  • Code visibility: the visualization of the Git process enables users to manage large projects with multiple branches and commits. SourceTree automatically tracks the activity of your code. It also features bookmarks where you can see a summarized view of all projects and repositories. Therefore, you can check a specific branch or commit with a single click. Finally, it features detailed branching diagrams that make it easy to follow the process.

  • Git and Hg support: the fully-featured GUI supports Git and Mercurial, offering a consistent development process from the start. You can also use SourceTree for a project on Github. Start by creating the project on Github, then connect it to the SourceTree software.

  • Free: the SourceTree tool is free to use, even for commercial uses, without buying a license.

  • Supports Git LFS: users can track large assets and submit code from a single dashboard.

  • Subordinated modules: you can use submodules for hand-picked dependencies and manage and group projects.

Atlassian SourceTree Use Cases

  • Check-in and check-out code using the client-side application.
  • You can also use SourceTree to repair broken Git repositories because you can easily detect mistakes at a glance.
  • The simple and intuitive user interface allows users to search for and clone remote repositories.

Reviews from Real Users

A Program Manager/Engineer at a government says, "The most valuable feature is the ability to fix a broken repository merge… This product has helped because we have been able to fix problems when our code repository breaks."

Atlassian SourceTree customers

Facebook, NASA, Cisco, eBay, Redfin, Toyota, Kaiser Permanente, Gilt, CSIRO, Autodesk, The Daily Telegraph, CODE, Illumnia,

Related questions

  • 15
When evaluating Version Control, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 12
Why is Version Control important for companies?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Version Control

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Bitbucket vs Atlassian SourceTree Logo
Bitbucket vs Atlassian SourceTree
Bitbucket Server vs Atlassian SourceTree Logo
Bitbucket Server vs Atlassian SourceTree
GitHub vs Atlassian SourceTree Logo
GitHub vs Atlassian SourceTree
Git vs Atlassian SourceTree Logo
Git vs Atlassian SourceTree
AWS CodeCommit vs Atlassian SourceTree Logo
AWS CodeCommit vs Atlassian SourceTree
IBM Rational ClearCase vs Atlassian SourceTree Logo
IBM Rational ClearCase vs Atlassian SourceTree
See all alternatives
 
Atlassian SourceTree Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Expert Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees3.5I primarily use Git Bash and Git UI, but my team relies on Atlassian SourceTree for project management, benefiting from its Agile features and conflict resolution tools. However, many are shifting to Visual Studio Code due to its dual functionalities.
Coach Agile Architecture & DevOps at Sistemas Humanos4.5I used Atlassian SourceTree for integration demos with tools like Jira and GitLab. The branches graph feature was invaluable, allowing me to manage branches without a terminal. It efficiently handled large projects, although I couldn't determine a specific ROI.
Software Engineer at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees4.0In my company, we use Atlassian SourceTree for code management due to its user-friendly interface compared to GitHub's CLI. While it effectively supports code pushes and pulls, its UI and message display can benefit from enhancements to improve user experience.
Vice President at SPECIALIZED PRODUCTS & SVC.2.5As a new programmer, I find Atlassian SourceTree's interface complicated and less accessible. When compared to GitKraken, I prefer GitKraken's simpler information presentation, which suggests SourceTree could benefit from improvements in usability for a better user experience.
Program Manager/Engineer at a government with 10,001+ employees4.0No summary available
ETL Developer at INGENIERIA 21 SAS4.5I use Atlassian SourceTree to manage source code from various environments, effectively merging developers' codes. It's reliable and easy to use with Bitbucket, but the user interface needs improvement. I haven't used other solutions or cloud providers.
Dynamic Engineering Manager at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees4.5No summary available
Software Developer at a tech company with 501-1,000 employees2.5No summary available