We performed a comparison between Apache Subversion and Atlassian SourceTree based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Version Control solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We have developed automation to speed up common repetitive processes."
"Apache Subversion is a scalable solution."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to fix a broken repository merge."
"The interface is very good and is easy to use. It tells you when you've committed, when you've uploaded, and gives you the differences."
"The solution's initial setup process is straightforward."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"Apache Subversion should be easier to use."
"The most valuable feature is CLI."
"The product's UI needs improvement."
"I have had a food experience with Atlassian SourceTree but it might not be for everyone."
"Its interface could be easy to understand for a programmer."
"For everyday use, I am more comfortable using the command line interface, rather than using SourceTree."
Apache Subversion is ranked 9th in Version Control with 4 reviews while Atlassian SourceTree is ranked 5th in Version Control with 5 reviews. Apache Subversion is rated 7.2, while Atlassian SourceTree is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Apache Subversion writes "Centralized repository, but the stability could improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Atlassian SourceTree writes "An easy-to-setup solution, but its documentation could be better for technical support". Apache Subversion is most compared with IBM Rational ClearCase and GitHub, whereas Atlassian SourceTree is most compared with Git, GitHub, Bitbucket, Bitbucket Server and AWS CodeCommit. See our Apache Subversion vs. Atlassian SourceTree report.
See our list of best Version Control vendors.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.