Windsurf offers a strategic approach to digital transformation, providing tools for optimizing processes. It's aimed at businesses looking to enhance efficiency and adapt to changing market demands through technology-driven solutions.


| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Windsurf | 8.0% |
| Codespaces | 10.2% |
| JetBrains IDEs | 8.2% |
| Other | 73.6% |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cursor | 4.5 | N/A | 100% | 1 interviewAdd to research |
| Google Gemini AI | 4.0 | N/A | 87% | 17 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 1 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 139 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 57 |
| Large Enterprise | 204 |
Targeted at enterprises, Windsurf integrates seamlessly with existing systems to improve workflow and data management. By offering customizable options, it meets diverse business requirements, enabling companies to stay competitive in a fast-paced environment. Its user-focused design ensures accessibility and ease of use, helping teams achieve their goals swiftly.
What are the key features of Windsurf?In areas like manufacturing and retail, Windsurf improves supply chain management and customer engagement. In healthcare, it optimizes patient data management, while in finance, it enhances compliance and reporting processes, each tailored to meet industry-specific challenges.
Dell, Anduril, MongoDB, Zillow, Atlassian
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Automation Engineer at a tech services company with 1-10 employees | 4.0 | I’ve used Windsurf for 10 months to build software and automations, relying on its fast, codebase-aware agent and autocomplete, boosting productivity about 200%. It’s stable and scalable, but can hallucinate and degrades after repeated prompts, so I review outputs. |
| Angular Developer at a computer retailer with 51-200 employees | 4.5 | I've used Windsurf for two years to boost Angular coding productivity through tab completions and suggestions, though its cascade agent struggles with complex tasks; overall, it's reliable, efficient, and significantly reduces boilerplate and bug-related issues. |
| Software Engineer at Collecto Fintech Solutions Pvt Ltd | 3.0 | I use Windsurf for API integration and boilerplate coding; its agentic fixes from pasted logs save significant time and improve quality. However, it can hallucinate, is sometimes slow, and less accurate than competitors. Pricing is reasonable; I rate it 6/10. |
| Founding BackEnd Engineer | 4.0 | I've used Windsurf for several months and found it highly effective for boosting productivity through its AI coding capabilities, especially with Python. It's affordable, easy to set up, reliable, but lacks collaborative and advanced CLI features. |
| Student at a university with 501-1,000 employees | 4.0 | I use Windsurf as an AI-powered VS Code-like IDE for my capstone, generating full-stack code with chat/write modes, preserving context, and fixing errors fast. It’s stable and scalable, but I want a better free trial with limited daily messages. |
| Principal Consultant at a outsourcing company with 1-10 employees | 4.5 | I've used Windsurf for a year in software development and found it integrates well, boosts productivity, and saves time, though I’d like better model discovery and restored browser integration; overall, it's been efficient and cost-effective. |
| Senior Software Developer at hireHQ | 5.0 | I use Windsurf to write and refactor code, benefiting from stable cloud deployment, inline editing, and a context-aware agent that understands my whole codebase and updates related files. It speeds development, but needs faster responses, better scaling, security, and accuracy. |
| Lead Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees | 3.5 | I've used Windsurf mainly for coding tasks and found it boosts productivity significantly, especially during short sprints. It's stable, scalable, and easy to onboard with, though I sometimes prefer Cursor for slightly more accurate code suggestions. |