GitHub CoPilot vs Windsurf comparison

GitHub and Windsurf are both solutions in the AI Code Assistants category. GitHub is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.1, while Windsurf is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.0. GitHub holds a 6.7% mindshare in AICA, compared to Windsurf’s 10.5% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Windsurf users who would recommend it.

GitHub CoPilot

Read 29 GitHub CoPilot reviews

4,372 Views
1,399 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Windsurf

Read 1 Windsurf review

2,855 Views
2,427 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GitHub CoPilot

Windsurf

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 19, 2025

GitHub CoPilot and Windsurf are competitors in the software development arena. GitHub CoPilot seems to have an edge with its AI-driven features, while Windsurf stands out due to its comprehensive toolset.

Features: GitHub CoPilot's key features include AI-driven code suggestions, which enhance coding efficiency, integration with popular IDEs, and real-time coding challenge assistance. Windsurf excels in analytics capabilities, collaboration tools, and high customizability. GitHub CoPilot focuses on improving coding efficiency via AI, whereas Windsurf provides a broader toolkit that supports project management and analysis.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub CoPilot offers an easy deployment model, integrating seamlessly with existing environments, with strong customer service enabling rapid adoption through detailed documentation and responsive support. Windsurf, suited for larger projects, involves a more complex deployment with tailored support options. GitHub CoPilot is advantageous for quick setup, while Windsurf requires more resources but offers personalized assistance.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub CoPilot provides a competitive pricing model with affordable subscriptions that lead to rapid ROI from improved coding efficiency. Windsurf demands a higher initial investment, but its ROI is realized through better project management capabilities and potential long-term benefits. GitHub CoPilot is more cost-effective with quick returns, while Windsurf justifies its higher cost with extensive features and sustained growth potential.

To learn more, read our detailed AI Code Assistants Report (Updated: October 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AI Code Assistants

October 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 873,347 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub CoPilot

Ranking in AI Code Assistants

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Rapid Application Development Software (8th)

Windsurf

Ranking in AI Code Assistants

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

2.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IDE (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the AI Code Assistants category, the mindshare of GitHub CoPilot is 6.7%, up from 5.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Windsurf is 10.5%, down from 23.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

AI Code Assistants Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitHub CoPilot	6.7%
Windsurf	10.5%
Other	82.8%

AI Code Assistants

Featured Reviews

TarunRevalla

Software Engineer at Yext Inc

Saves time with context-aware code suggestions and seamless integration

In terms of improvements for Copilot, I haven't considered much since it offers many useful interactions. It integrates well with GitHub repositories, tracks changes on PRs, and provides valuable suggestions where applicable. There is excellent support across various code editors like JetBrains, VS Code, and NeoGen. I also run many automations within GitHub. When an NPR is raised, it automatically provides suggestions, which is part of the enterprise edition without limitations. While I don't see immediate room for improvement, one suggestion is for Copilot to provide specific suggestions for certain lines of code instead of rewriting entire sections. If the tool could focus on specific lines where changes are suggested, it would save time and reduce server load.

Read full review

reviewer2748786

Founding BackEnd Engineer

Enhancing productivity with advanced code generation and low-cost accessibility

What they can do further and venture into next is to provide a CLI environment, similar to the command-line interface environment that Cursor offers. It allows for running a cursor agent from the command line to make changes, review pull requests, or access certain other capabilities. These capabilities are currently not in Windsurf. Windsurf focuses on the productivity and the ID/editor part. I would rather look for the inclusion of pull request reviews or a kind of a TRD or technical requirement general documentation generation, or system diagram generation directly from the codebase in Windsurf itself. These should be the next obvious features they launch for developers. In our team, there are certain people who use Windsurf regularly and appreciate using it. However, it is not a collaborative tool where someone is going to use the same tool and interact in the same IDE. Everyone does their local development, pushes it to different Git branches, someone reviews the PR, and then merges the branch. It is very localized in that sense.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Code Assistants solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

873,347 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	13

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub CoPilot?

The product is easy to integrate.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub CoPilot?

I am not fully aware of the pricing details as my company manages it, but I recall it was not inexpensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub CoPilot?

GitHub CoPilot should be integrated with different IDEs beyond VS Code, as it is currently only supported by VS Code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Windsurf?

I would rate it two out of 10 for cost. It is very cheap compared to other tools in the market because 80% of the time, we are happy with their free model capabilities. Only 20% of the time do we g...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Windsurf?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Windsurf?

I have been using Windsurf for quite a long time, approximately four to five months. In my prior company, Windsurf was used, and in my new company, we also implemented Windsurf. For my personal use...

See all answers

Comparisons

GitLab vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 24% of the time

Blackbox.ai vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 11% of the time

Amazon Q vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 8% of the time

Qodo Gen vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 6% of the time

More GitHub CoPilot Competitors

Cursor vs Windsurf

Compared 33% of the time

Amazon Q vs Windsurf

Compared 15% of the time

Claude for Enterprise vs Windsurf

Compared 13% of the time

Qodo Gen vs Windsurf

Compared 7% of the time

More Windsurf Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitHub CoPilot

November 2025

Download GitHub CoPilot product report

Buyer's Guide

IDE

October 2025

Download Windsurf product report

Overview

GitHub CoPilot accelerates developer productivity with code generation, test case creation, and code explanation. It provides context-aware suggestions, integrates with popular IDEs, and supports multiple languages.

GitHub CoPilot significantly boosts development efficiency by reducing coding and debugging time. Its user-friendly auto-complete and variable detection features streamline complex tasks, serving as a learning tool for developers. Areas needing improvement include its accuracy, stability, and broader integration with IDEs and languages. Users find the pricing strategy expensive and wish for enhanced contextual understanding, diverse result formats, and image support. Expanded functionality and better integration in highly regulated environments are important for future growth.

What are the most valued features of GitHub CoPilot?

Code Generation: Accelerates coding with smart suggestions.
Test Case Creation: Streamlines automated testing.
Code Explanation: Offers detailed insights into code segments.
Context-Aware Suggestions: Provides personalized assistance.
Multi-Language Support: Enhances versatility across programming languages.

Which benefits should users look for in reviews?

Increased Efficiency: Reduces time spent on coding tasks.
Enhanced Productivity: Speeds up the development process.
Learning Aid: Aids developers in understanding and creating complex code.
Task Automation: Facilitates automating repetitive coding tasks.

Utilized across industries to enhance application development and productivity, GitHub CoPilot assists in generating code snippets, writing code skeletons, analyzing documents, and automating workflows. It supports coding best practices, prompt engineering, and natural language processing. Developers leverage its capabilities for creating meeting summaries, report recommendations, and content ideas, thereby optimizing workflow efficiency.

GitHub

Windsurf offers a strategic approach to digital transformation, providing tools for optimizing processes. It's aimed at businesses looking to enhance efficiency and adapt to changing market demands through technology-driven solutions.

Targeted at enterprises, Windsurf integrates seamlessly with existing systems to improve workflow and data management. By offering customizable options, it meets diverse business requirements, enabling companies to stay competitive in a fast-paced environment. Its user-focused design ensures accessibility and ease of use, helping teams achieve their goals swiftly.

What are the key features of Windsurf?

Integration Capability: Connects with numerous software platforms, ensuring smooth data flow.
Customizable Options: Offers flexibility to tailor functionalities to specific business needs.
User-Friendly Interface: Designed for ease of adoption with minimal training requirements.
Real-Time Data Analysis: Provides immediate insights to support decision-making.

What benefits and ROI does Windsurf offer?

Increased Productivity: Streamlines operations leading to time and resource savings.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces overhead by optimizing processes and systems.
Improved Decision-Making: Real-time insights aid in strategic planning.
Scalability: Easily adapts as business grows without significant additional investment.

In areas like manufacturing and retail, Windsurf improves supply chain management and customer engagement. In healthcare, it optimizes patient data management, while in finance, it enhances compliance and reporting processes, each tailored to meet industry-specific challenges.

Windsurf

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Dell, Anduril, MongoDB, Zillow, Atlassian

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), GitHub, Google and others in AI Code Assistants. Updated: October 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

873,347 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best AI Code Assistants vendors.

We monitor all AI Code Assistants reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.