No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
Thales Authenticators Logo

Thales Authenticators Reviews

Vendor: Thales
4.0 out of 5

What is Thales Authenticators?

Featured Thales Authenticators reviews

Thales Authenticators mindshare

As of April 2026, the mindshare of Thales Authenticators in the Authentication Systems category stands at 2.4%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Authentication Systems Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Thales Authenticators2.4%
Microsoft Entra ID7.8%
Okta Platform5.0%
Other84.8%
Authentication Systems
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Government
9%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Construction Company
8%
Performing Arts
8%
Media Company
4%
Outsourcing Company
4%
Energy/Utilities Company
3%
Computer Software Company
3%
Insurance Company
3%
Healthcare Company
3%
Non Profit
2%
University
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Marketing Services Firm
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Educational Organization
2%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Retailer
1%
Renewables & Environment Company
1%
Wellness & Fitness Company
1%
Legal Firm
1%
 
Thales Authenticators Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Automation and Telecommunications Analyst at Grupo Energisa4.5We use Thales Authenticators primarily for multifactor authentication, especially for VPNs and security tools. Its YAML 2.0 integration and management interface are valuable, yet improvements could be made in token delivery. It offers a good ROI.
ICT Specialist System Management at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees4.0We use Thales Authenticators for virtual machine login on a hybrid cloud, but it doesn't meet our needs. Lack of Microsoft 365 integration, redundant security features, and inconvenient issue resolution are drawbacks. We're considering migrating to a better solution like Duo.
Service Delivery Manager at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees3.5We use SafeNet Authentication Manager for secure user authentication, finding its setup straightforward and support good. However, stability and scalability could improve, and we'll switch to Microsoft as SafeNet is falling behind.
CTO at TESSIS4.0I like SafeNet Authentication Manager's hardware token and OTP support, scalability, and easy setup. Technical support is good, but it needs multi-tenant architecture. I recommend it for PKI, rating it 8/10.
Director at a consultancy with 51-200 employees4.0As a long-time user, I find this product stable and scalable with a simple setup. However, it lacks integration with other platforms. I rate it an 8/10.