Axiad Conductor vs Thales Authenticators comparison

Axiad and Thales are both solutions in the Authentication Systems category. Axiad is ranked #23, while Thales is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.0. Axiad holds a 0.7% mindshare in AS, compared to Thales’s 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Axiad users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Thales users who would recommend it.

Axiad Conductor

Read 6 Axiad Conductor reviews

961 Views
596 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Thales Authenticators

Read 6 Thales Authenticators reviews

1,196 Views
945 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Axiad Conductor

Thales Authenticators

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 28, 2025

Thales Authenticators and Axiad Conductor are competitors in identity and access management solutions. Thales leads in pricing and support, while Axiad shines with its feature-rich offerings.

Features: Thales Authenticators focuses on advanced multi-factor authentication, high-security standards, and seamless PKI and OTP support. Axiad Conductor offers robust device lifecycle management, single-click user enrollment with smart cards and YubiKeys, and an intuitive management interface.

Room for Improvement: Thales could enhance deployment flexibility and reduce complexity for faster setup. Expanding integration options could also benefit Thales users. Axiad might improve its cost-effectiveness for smaller enterprises, simplify self-service options further, and enhance initial onboarding to shorten setup time.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Axiad Conductor provides a streamlined, scalable deployment with comprehensive support, making integration user-friendly. Thales, while offering excellent customer service, may require more time and resources due to its thorough security setup.

Pricing and ROI: Thales Authenticators generally has a lower initial cost, making it a cost-effective choice for secure implementations. Axiad, despite higher upfront expenses, promises significant ROI through its extensive features and adaptability.

To learn more, read our detailed Axiad Conductor vs. Thales Authenticators Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Axiad Conductor vs. Thales Authenticators

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Axiad Conductor

Ranking in Authentication Systems

23rd

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Identity Management (IM) (59th), Privileged Access Management (PAM) (40th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (27th), Passwordless Authentication (9th), Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) (41st), Insider Risk Management (25th), Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) (8th), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (15th)

Thales Authenticators

Ranking in Authentication Systems

13th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Authentication Systems category, the mindshare of Axiad Conductor is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Thales Authenticators is 2.3%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Authentication Systems Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Thales Authenticators	2.3%
Axiad Conductor	0.7%
Other	97.0%

Authentication Systems

Featured Reviews

Eric Brown

Cybersecurity Director - Enterprise Identity & Access Management at SAIC

The day-to-day tasks, running the servers, and making sure that everything is patched is all handled by the platform

The most valuable feature is the overhead management of the platform. There is less for my team to worry about. The day-to-day tasks, running the servers, and making sure that everything is patched is all handled by the platform. We just consume the service and work with them to refine it, making it even more valuable. Aside from Active Directory, anything that is a multi-factor platform is handled through Axiad Cloud. It is critical for helping to enforce usage of authentication devices across our organization. One of our requirements to continue some of our contracts is to have multi-factor authentication across all devices accessing the network. It is extremely easy to enroll a user with “One Click Issuance”. I have had very few calls to the service desk regarding enrollment. It takes a couple of minutes to enroll a user with "One Click Issuance". Deploying and managing authenticators is very easy, either done by a mobile application or enrollment of an OTP token. It is very simple. This is important to my userbase, which makes it important to me. Functionality-wise, it is pretty solid.

Read full review

Gustavo Merighi

Automation and Telecommunications Analyst at Grupo Energisa

Has an easy-to-use management interface and a straightforward initial setup process

Our primary use cases include multifactor authentication for VPN connections and access to security tools like jump servers and firewalls. We also use it to enhance security measures in an enterprise environment The most valuable feature is the YAML 2.0 integration. It has an easy-to-use…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's very user-friendly. We're issuing YubiKeys for our corporate users and they just plug it in, go to the Axiad Cloud portal, and click the issue button. It's a couple of steps."

"The life cycle management of credentials is the aspect that we have found to be the most useful... The differentiator that Axiad provided was the ability to provide users a way to self-serve the updating of their credentials on their private keys. That was the feature we were most interested in and Axiad does an excellent job of it."

"And when it comes to enrolling a user, it's super easy with One Click Issuance... It's so easy now that we can offload the process to our clients who can self-enroll. Previously, we would have to do the enrollment process because it was so complicated."

"Aside from Active Directory, anything that is a multi-factor platform is handled through Axiad Cloud. It is critical for helping to enforce usage of authentication devices across our organization."

"What I have found most valuable is the overall way Axiad listened to our problems and helped us solve them. They provided guidance and expertise, with their experience, that enabled us to be successful in a very challenging space."

"The solution has also saved us time by having end-users troubleshoot issues through the MyCircle feature, and has definitely reduced the efforts of our administrators. It is saving us five to 10 minutes per incident."

"One valuable feature is Thales' ability to provide off-site tokens."

"I like how the solution allows me to support different types of hardware tokens and integrate with OTP."

"Scalable and stable."

"We use this solution to log into virtual machines like VMware and VMware Horizon."

"The technical support services are good."

"The most valuable feature of SafeNet Authentication Manager is authentication."

Cons

"macOS is notoriously ever-evolving and it's difficult to keep pace with it as it pertains to certain kinds of crypto authentication. That's really not even on Axiad. That's a decision by Apple, but it makes it a moving target."

"I would like a more modern look to the portal."

"We would prefer that the solution be hosted in Canada because we're a Canadian entity. That would be nice to have. It's not a feature, as such, but it would really make us a lot happier if it could be located in Canada."

"With their licensing model, it becomes hard to scale. For example, we couldn't roll it out enterprise-wide because if you scale it across more than 100,000 users, the cost becomes too exorbitant."

"I'm looking forward to seeing how they move to FIDO U2F as their primary authentication method across all of their solutions."

"There are just some minor tweaks that could be made on the front end. It would be cool to have nicknames for authenticator devices. If you have more than one, it's hard to discern what you have."

"Lacks integration with other platforms."

"The stability could improve."

"The problem with SafeNet is that it's not integrated with Microsoft 365."

"The solution should allow for support of multi-tenant architecture."

"The product could be improved by adding more features for sending tokens via SMS or phone calls."

"We faced issues due to slow ticket responses, which improved over time."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Axiad's pricing was what we were expecting. It was at the right spot. They were competitive."

"The pricing is very competitive for what is offered at the level that we need. They are right there with what the industry standards are. They tend to be a little bit less, in terms of cost, when we are talking about security at government standards. So, I would say that they have a slight advantage on cost compared to the industry average. They are the lower cost solution and the best bargain out on the market today."

"It's very cheap on a per-year basis. The cards themselves last about three years and the license is on the order of double-digit dollars per user, and not hundreds of dollars per user, per year."

"Don't just focus on the hardware or software costs of acquiring a solution, but look at it from the perspective that so much of what it takes to run a PKI environment has to do with the people who are running it.... look at the total cost of ownership and not just the cost of acquisition."

"There is an annual licensing fee."

"Thales is more expensive than its competitors."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with Thales Authenticators?

Currently, the solution fulfills our requirements. We are very satisfied with its features, and do not have any specific ideas for improvement right now. Perhaps, in the future, three-factor authen...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Thales Authenticators?

Our employees, whether working on-site or remotely, use Thales Authenticators for two-factor authentication to log in to their laptops or PCs. This is our primary use case.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Thales Authenticators?

From our past years of experience, the solution is very smooth, and we have had a good experience with it. We would definitely recommend Thales to others for its reliability and features. I'd rate ...

See all answers

Comparisons

CyberArk Certificate Manager vs Axiad Conductor

Compared 100% of the time

More Axiad Conductor Competitors

Utimaco SecurityServer vs Thales Authenticators

Compared 24% of the time

Yubico YubiKey vs Thales Authenticators

Compared 21% of the time

Atalla Hardware Security Module vs Thales Authenticators

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Thales Authenticators

Compared 7% of the time

RSA SecurID vs Thales Authenticators

Compared 6% of the time

More Thales Authenticators Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Axiad Conductor

October 2025

Download Axiad Conductor product report

Buyer's Guide

Authentication Systems

September 2025

Download Thales Authenticators product report

Also Known As

Axiad Cloud

Gemalto Ezio, Ezio, Gemalto Authenticators, SafeNet Authentication Manager

Overview

Axiad Conductor offers a user-friendly platform for managing multifactor authentication and credential lifecycle, supporting seamless transitions to cloud environments for enhanced security compliance and access control.

Axiad Conductor stands out with intuitive management of multifactor authentication systems, assertive device lifecycle management, and a managed cloud solution that streamlines operations. It promotes user self-service for credential updates, minimizing the need for extensive training. With the capability to handle large networks, it enhances efficiency while meeting contract demands. Addressing user suggestions, plans include interface design updates and Canadian hosting, although macOS's frequent updates pose integration challenges.

What are the principal features of Axiad Conductor?

"One Click Issuance": Simplifies user enrollment through easy interface actions.
Multifactor Authentication: Manages critical authentication processes securely.
PKI Support: Facilitates seamless management in PKI environments.
Credential Self-Service: Empowers users to handle updates independently.
Cloud Management: Reduces operational burdens due to its managed environment.

What should users look for in terms of ROI and benefits?

Efficiency: Streamlined operations boost productivity across large networks.
Flexibility: Adaptability to meet evolving challenges and contract requirements.
User Empowerment: Enables users to manage their credentials autonomously.
Compliance: Supports regulation adherence effortlessly.

In diverse industries, Axiad Conductor is implemented to manage multifactor authentication and PKI elements like smart cards and YubiKeys. Organizations leverage it to ensure compliance, facilitate secure workforce access, and transition PKI systems to the cloud, handling substantial volumes of smart card and machine certificates with ease.

Axiad

Offering the broadest range of authentication methods and form factors, Thales allows customers to address numerous use cases, assurance levels, and threat vectors with unified, centrally managed policies—managed from one authentication back end delivered in the cloud or on premise.

Thales

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Standard Chartered Bank (SCB)

Buyer's Guide

Axiad Conductor vs. Thales Authenticators

September 2025

Free Report: Axiad Conductor vs. Thales Authenticators

Find out what your peers are saying about Axiad Conductor vs. Thales Authenticators and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Axiad Conductor vs. Thales Authenticators report.

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.