Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Ruckus Wireless WAN Logo

Ruckus Wireless WAN Reviews

Vendor: Ruckus
4.1 out of 5
Badge Leader

What is Ruckus Wireless WAN?

Featured Ruckus Wireless WAN reviews

Ruckus Wireless WAN mindshare

As of December 2025, the mindshare of Ruckus Wireless WAN in the Wireless WAN category stands at 28.3%, down from 37.8% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Wireless WAN Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Ruckus Wireless WAN28.3%
Ubiquiti Wireless35.3%
Cambium Networks Wireless WAN12.3%
Other24.10000000000001%
Wireless WAN

PeerResearch reports based on Ruckus Wireless WAN reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryWireless WANDec 30, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersDec 30, 2025Download
ComparisonRuckus Wireless WAN vs Ubiquiti WirelessDec 30, 2025Download
ComparisonRuckus Wireless WAN vs Cisco Wireless WANDec 30, 2025Download
ComparisonRuckus Wireless WAN vs Cambium Networks Wireless WANDec 30, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Ubiquiti Wireless4.035.3%89%77 interviewsAdd to research
Cambium Networks Wireless WAN4.212.3%95%29 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Nov 22, 2025

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business30
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise10
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business160
Midsize Enterprise57
Large Enterprise137
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Comms Service Provider
15%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Outsourcing Company
5%
University
4%
Media Company
4%
Healthcare Company
4%
Educational Organization
4%
Hospitality Company
4%
Real Estate/Law Firm
4%
Construction Company
4%
Government
3%
Non Profit
3%
Legal Firm
3%
Retailer
3%
Performing Arts
3%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
Insurance Company
1%
Energy/Utilities Company
1%
Photography Company
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Renewables & Environment Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%

Compare Ruckus Wireless WAN with alternative products

Learn more about Ruckus Wireless WAN

Ruckus Wireless WAN customers

Related questions

 
Ruckus Wireless WAN Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
IT Manager at Handi Quilter, Inc.4.5I upgraded a warehouse's unreliable Wi-Fi with Ruckus Wireless WAN access points, which solved heat-related failures and improved performance, though the guest network and lack of free support were drawbacks. Overall, it's a reliable, set-it-and-forget-it solution.
Networks Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees2.5I use Ruckus Wireless WAN mainly for Wi-Fi, but find it overpriced and lacking features compared to competitors. It's stable, but support response could improve. Overall, I’d recommend considering other options for better value and functionality.
Director, Operations at a comms service provider with 1-10 employees5.0I deploy Ruckus Wireless WAN primarily in high-end residential environments for its superior client device experience and unmatched Wi-Fi performance. However, Ruckus needs to improve its support response times and avoid competing with lower-tier brands.
CEO at Netsys Solutions (Pvt) Ltd4.0As a system integrator specializing in the hospitality sector, I recommend Ruckus Wireless WAN due to its advanced features like BeamFlex, which enhance reliability and satisfaction. However, it needs better market awareness and a stronger presence in Gartner reports.
Manager, Information Technology at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees4.5I primarily use Ruckus Wireless WAN to provide wireless access at branch locations. The Ruckus Jones platform offers valuable cloud-based management tools with helpful AI, though it needs more flexibility in granular access control. I've also used Meraki for wireless solutions.
Senior Engineer IT Networking at JSW3.0We use Ruckus Wireless WAN for outdoor WiFi connectivity, valuing its robust Adaptive Antenna Beamforming feature. However, it requires manual frequency switching and has weaker signal penetration compared to Cisco, which we also use for better performance.
Operations Director at Conecty3.5I recommend Ruckus Wireless WAN for its cost-effectiveness compared to Cisco or Huawei and ease of use, offering good coverage, especially outdoors. However, support needs improvement, particularly in Africa. Previously, we used solutions from Cambium and Alcatel Lucent.
Senior Project Manager / Project Director at three6five network solutions4.0I use Ruckus Wireless WAN in various sectors like hotels and hospitals for Wi-Fi and IoT applications. Its insights, easy deployment, and reliable hardware are valuable, though network access could be simplified. Customers also consider Cisco or Aruba solutions.