Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Netskope Private Access Logo

Netskope Private Access Reviews

Vendor: Netskope
4.3 out of 5
Leave a review

What is Netskope Private Access?

Netskope Private Access is an integral component of the Netskope Security Cloud platform that provides zero-trust secure access to enterprise applications and data in hybrid IT (public cloud and data center) environments. It offers comprehensive policy management, compliance assessment, and supports any application, protocol, and device to reduce risk and simplify security operations.

Get the Netskope Private Access Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Netskope Private Access, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform and more!
Netskope Private Access is the #9 ranked solution in top ZTNA services. PeerSpot users give Netskope Private Access an average rating of 8.6 out of 10. Netskope Private Access is most commonly compared to Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks: Netskope Private Access vs Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks. Netskope Private Access is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 59% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a manufacturing company, accounting for 12% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
Netskope Private Access
October 2025
Get the report
Helped 870,697 peers since 2012

Featured Netskope Private Access reviews

Read more reviews

Netskope Private Access mindshare

As of October 2025, the mindshare of Netskope Private Access in the ZTNA as a Service category stands at 4.7%, up from 4.3% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
ZTNA as a Service Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Netskope Private Access4.7%
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform17.4%
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks13.7%
Other64.2%
ZTNA as a Service

PeerResearch reports based on Netskope Private Access reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryZTNA as a ServiceOct 19, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersOct 19, 2025Download
ComparisonNetskope Private Access vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange PlatformOct 19, 2025Download
ComparisonNetskope Private Access vs Prisma Access by Palo Alto NetworksOct 19, 2025Download
ComparisonNetskope Private Access vs Cato SASE Cloud PlatformOct 19, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks4.113.7%92%65 interviewsAdd to research
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform4.217.4%98%64 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Netskope Private Access provides secure, seamless remote application access without traditional VPN requirements. It reduces latency by routing traffic via local data centers and offers strong application access control with DLP and content filtering. It allows granular application access assignments, eliminates bandwidth constraints, and enhances security with outbound-only connectivity. The architecture is cost-effective and easy-to-maintain. Users benefit from internet visibility, extensive configurability, robust security, and the ability to apply specific access policies.
  • "The main benefit for users from Netskope Private Access would be secure access from anywhere; they can easily access their systems or applications in their office premises or on-premises environment in a very secure way and the organization can also be assured knowing that whatever access they have been providing to their remote users goes through proper checks and balances before access is provided."
  • "Netskope Private Access covers a wide range of use cases with solutions for client-server and server-to-client connectivity patterns."
  • "In the VPN scenario, what was happening, the user would get back to the complete source. But in NPA, the application will go to the user. There is an outbound connection. There is no inbound. Storage providers are also not there. It's the best feature because it is the replacement of the VPN."

Room for Improvement

Netskope Private Access could improve its ease of use, integration of SD-WAN, visibility, and support for dynamic protocols like IPv6. It could address cost, enhance DLP policies, offer agentless portal security, and handle on-premises DNS mapping better. Limited server access, interoperability, and features like ICMP support need attention. Security for agentless access, faster feature deployment, and more comprehensive data protection strategies are sought by users. It is perceived as trailing competitors in market leadership.
  • "In some cases, it is a tedious task to do the integration where the application is not that open or it is not supported out-of-the-box from Netskope."
  • "Netskope Private Access could improve by enhancing visibility of user performance and application performance. It should also integrate wider DLP and inspection engines on private access traffic."
  • "Netskope needs to provide some kind of data protection strategy as well because, currently, if you connect through private access, we don't have any data protection policies or implementation."

ROI

The ROI from Netskope Private Access is highly satisfactory. Users praise its ability to enhance security measures and provide seamless remote access. It was noted that the software effectively protected sensitive data, leading to increased trust and peace of mind. Additionally, users appreciated the ease of use and the overall positive impact on productivity.

Pricing

Netskope Private Access offers competitive pricing that appeals to enterprises, especially with its per-user, per-year license. While some users find it not the cheapest, others highlight its cost-effectiveness compared to solutions like Zscaler. The pricing is fixed for a subscription but varies with enabled features, allowing for potential discounts with feature bundling. Though it's generally viewed as affordable, costs for running publishers in data centers or cloud services like AWS should be considered.
  • "It is significantly cost-effective compared to its contenders."
  • "The tool's price is normal. It is not very cheap but good compared to the competitors."
  • "There was about 60% ROI, just in terms of savings. We had 40% to 60% reduction in monthly operational costs by using Netskope."

Popular Use Cases

Organizations primarily use Netskope Private Access to replace traditional VPNs, facilitating secure, seamless access to internal resources for remote users. It aids in digital transformation by enabling Zero Trust Network Access, improving compliance, and providing secure, consistent connectivity for SaaS applications. Its user-friendly interface and backend adjustments enhance the end-user experience without altering user interaction. It supports secure remote desktop access and policy enforcement across on-premises and home environments, meeting varied security and connectivity needs.

Service and Support

Netskope Private Access customer service is fast, responsive, and handles inquiries from pre-sales to post-sales efficiently. Spanish-speaking engineers enhance service in Mexico. While some users experienced delays in queries, the majority found the support team helpful, resolving issues swiftly, especially post-migration challenges from CentOS to Ubuntu. Engineers across L1, L2, and L3 levels contribute significantly to troubleshooting and support. Occasionally, ticket resolution takes longer, but overall satisfaction remains high among users.

Deployment

Netskope Private Access's initial setup is straightforward with a user-friendly interface. It involves a cloud GUI and is often enforced automatically. Installation requires defining policies and registering applications via the cloud platform or on-premises, often needing only one or two people. The process is quick, typically under a month, though complexity arises with security policies and multi-office setups. Documentation is comprehensive, and the transition to Zero Trust Network Access requires careful management.

Scalability

Netskope Private Access excels in scalability, handling thousands of users with ease. Many organizations rate its scalability highly, though some note limitations for mobile devices and additional complexities for larger enterprises. Despite these concerns, its ability to support large deployments and its flexible licensing model make it a scalable choice. Users appreciate its capacity for expansion and ability to manage connections seamlessly, maintaining efficiency even in high-demand environments.

Stability

Netskope Private Access is generally regarded as stable, with ratings ranging from seven to nine out of ten. Some users note occasional data center switching and the need for policy configuration, while others highlight the effectiveness of the troubleshooter in resolving issues. Stability varies based on environmental complexity but is favorable compared to traditional VPNs. Outages have occurred but without significant business impact, and troubleshooting is usually straightforward unless the environment is very complex.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our Netskope Private Access Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise7
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business70
Midsize Enterprise45
Large Enterprise166
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Computer Software Company
10%
Insurance Company
6%
Real Estate/Law Firm
5%
Comms Service Provider
5%
Healthcare Company
5%
Government
4%
Outsourcing Company
4%
Energy/Utilities Company
4%
Educational Organization
4%
Retailer
4%
Legal Firm
4%
Non Profit
2%
Media Company
2%
Construction Company
2%
University
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Pharma/Biotech Company
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Performing Arts
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Engineering Company
1%
Marketing Services Firm
1%

Compare Netskope Private Access with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about Netskope Private Access

Netskope Private Access customers

Evalueserve, Stroock, Apria, Ather Energy

Related questions

  • 107
Zscaler Private Access (ZPA) vs. Netskope Private Access (NPA)
  • 83
Which is the best choice of Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)?
  • 35
How is Zero Trust different from the Least Privileged model?
  • 17
Best Alternative for Zscaler Private Access
  • 19
What is Cybersecurity Mesh and how is it related to Zero Trust?
  • 10
What is ZTNA as a service?
  • 92
When evaluating ZTNA as a Service solutions, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 7
When evaluating ZTNA as a Service, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 107
Zscaler Private Access (ZPA) vs. Netskope Private Access (NPA)
  • 6
What are your top Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) predictions for 2022?

Product Categories

Product Categories
ZTNA as a Service

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Netskope Private Access Logo
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Netskope Private Access
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Netskope Private Access Logo
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Netskope Private Access
Cloudflare One vs Netskope Private Access Logo
Cloudflare One vs Netskope Private Access
Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Netskope Private Access Logo
Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Netskope Private Access
Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) vs Netskope Private Access Logo
Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) vs Netskope Private Access
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs Netskope Private Access Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs Netskope Private Access
Appgate SDP vs Netskope Private Access Logo
Appgate SDP vs Netskope Private Access
JumpCloud vs Netskope Private Access Logo
JumpCloud vs Netskope Private Access
Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs Netskope Private Access Logo
Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs Netskope Private Access
Jamf Connect vs Netskope Private Access Logo
Jamf Connect vs Netskope Private Access
Google BeyondCorp Remote Access vs Netskope Private Access Logo
Google BeyondCorp Remote Access vs Netskope Private Access
See all alternatives
 
Netskope Private Access Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Presales Manager at a computer software company with 51-200 employees4.0I've used Netskope Private Access for over four years to ensure secure, seamless remote access, appreciating its device checks and adaptive policies, though integration can be tricky and DLP support would further enhance its capabilities.
Network Service Specialist at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees4.5I used Netskope Private Access primarily as a VPN replacement for internal resource access. Its flexible, scalable solutions for connectivity were valuable, though it could enhance user and application performance visibility. I evaluated Zscaler ZTNA during my search.
Regional Manager at Orange4.0I’ve found Netskope Private Access effective for remote and office users, with strong scalability and stability, though setup can be complex. It competes with Zscaler, and I’d rate it 8 out of 10 overall.
Senior System Engineer - Microsoft Azure Cloud at a retailer with 51-200 employees4.0We use Netskope Private Access for secure access to remote desktop and Active Directory resources. It allows policy control for private apps, though it lacks ICMP or ping support, complicating connectivity tests. We considered Zscaler, which supports ICMP.
Security Architect Manager at Aboitiz Equity Ventures, Inc.4.5Netskope Private Access secures our infrastructure connections with a seamless user experience, offering advanced security features like DLP and web filtering. We've improved ROI and reduced costs by replacing our VPN with Netskope while utilizing AWS as our cloud provider.
Assistant Manager at Bharti Airtel Limited3.5I used Netskope Private Access to address VPN limitations by enabling outbound connections without resource exposure. However, data protection needs improvement, as it currently lacks policies to monitor data transfers within internal servers.
Associate Presales Lead at a tech services company with 201-500 employees4.5I use Netskope Private Access to replace legacy VPNs, offering secure outbound connectivity and cost-effectiveness. It eliminates bandwidth limits and maintenance costs but needs improvement in DNS mapping. Compared to others, Netskope is cheaper and aligns with pricing standards.
Network Security Specialist at Sogefi Group5.0We deployed Netskope Private Access for robust internet security and VPN access for remote users. It excels in configurability and security but faces issues in China due to the Great Firewall. Netskope is more cost-effective than Zscaler.