Axis Security vs Netskope Private Access comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
HPE Aruba Networking Logo
1,583 views|993 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Netskope Logo
1,768 views|1,121 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Axis Security and Netskope Private Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two ZTNA as a Service solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Axis Security vs. Netskope Private Access Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I would give it an A-plus for securing access to our applications, devices, and network. It does an extremely good job. Our security folks have analyzed it and tried to find loopholes, but they found none.""The entire suite and the entire ZTNA process are very valuable.""The way the access connectors work is valuable.""The most valuable aspect is its ability to restrict unauthorized access, ensuring that only approved devices can connect to the network. T""The most valuable part so far has been Axis Security's ability to create identity connections to various servers, allowing users to access them. By doing so, we've managed to replace any old or existing VPN access with Axis Security. We are slowly but surely getting rid of our traditional VPN."

More Axis Security Pros →

"The product's scalability is good.""With private access or next-gen VPN, they are able to keep you secure, but they are invisible in terms of how they do it. Anybody working from home and trying to bring up VPN quickly can pretty much get VPN up and running in a matter of minutes because this doesn't require any VPN technology on-prem. All the VPN technologies that you're using to access applications on-premise can be eliminated by using their software. If you're accessing Microsoft 365 or salesforce.com, you can go straight out from your home office or home internet to that application rather than having to come through a VPN. It still has all the policies enforced, and it mitigates any business risks in terms of how that user is accessing that application and what they're doing inside of it. VPN piece is really critical, especially at this time of Covid, and your latency also goes down. Your latency gets better by using the platform because they're intercepting your traffic, routing it through their local data center, and then sending it to whichever SaaS service or whatever you're going to. It does it better, faster, and quicker with all your governance policies enforced, rather than you having to go through your data center. So, all the traffic gets hauls there, and then that traffic has got to route somewhere else, and then it has got to go up to the cloud. Your latency actually goes down. They can guarantee 15 milliseconds or less pretty much across anywhere on the planet for about 95% or 90% of it.""It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution.""Netskope enables users to securely access private applications remotely without a VPN.""The most valuable feature is being able to see who is accessing the application, whether it is a managed device or a bring-your-own-device published by Netskope.""The base features have been fantastic. The ability to be able to granularly assign application access to end-users has been really good.""In the firewall, we don't have a user-based policies list, and we can't create them. Netskope helps us to create user-based policies. For example, if there are specific teams like HR or more than nine teams, and we want logs from access over particular URLs, and we don't want to allow that specific URL for certain users, we can create these policies in Netskope. It's handy, easy to use for new users, and has a cool GUI interface. We can create multiple policies, and as for the proxy, it's a leading solution.""The initial setup of Netskope Private Access is pretty simple and straightforward."

More Netskope Private Access Pros →

Cons
"I would like more detailed logging in the Axis Security interface.""The support team should be more skilled in offering assistance.""I would like more statistics about what's going on in terms of usage. There is little-to-no usage reporting. That's one thing we've requested, and I think they're working on it.""They need to improve the networking and security tools a little in the troubleshooting and 'bad-actor' areas to help us analyze security threats a little better. They have some things built-in, but I would like to see more advanced tools.""I would appreciate more automated learning capabilities or increased integration with other security tools, allowing us to establish automation."

More Axis Security Cons →

"Netskope detects certain data or contents, but there are some limitations on how we can customize those policies for DLP.""The cost has room for improvement.""Netskope Private Access only supports TCP and UDP ports and does not support ICMP or ping.""The main challenge we are facing across various Trust Network Access (TNA) technologies, including Netskope, is their inability to support broadcast applications or those relying on broadcasting protocols.""The solution needs to develop faster features. Its interoperability feature is not working. It takes six months to one year for any product to implement the improvements. However, the process should be faster to implement the changes quickly.""Netskope Private Access allows mapping only one DNS server. If a user uses a secondary DNS on-premises, Netskope fails to disconnect them. This is an issue that needs to be addressed.""There could be an ability to access one server from another when we have console access to the first server.""The major problem that we are facing is if we deploy Netskope on the server level or if we get a new server in the EMEA factor, it will affect all the machines. Recently, this has caused us to fail some reviews."

More Netskope Private Access Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing is quite fair. It's better than what we gave up, which was Cisco AnyConnect."
  • "The pricing is very competitive from what I've seen."
  • More Axis Security Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "When it comes to pricing, Netskope Private Access is relatively cheap compared to other solutions."
  • "I believe that the price for Netskope Private Access is included in the features or functionality my company purchased from NetSkope."
  • "It is not the most expensive option, being more affordable than Zscaler, but it's also not the most budget-friendly choice available."
  • "It is not cheap, but the value of the solution is there. It's worth the investment."
  • "Netskope Private Access is more inexpensive than other products."
  • "There was about 60% ROI, just in terms of savings. We had 40% to 60% reduction in monthly operational costs by using Netskope."
  • "The pricing of the solution is cheap."
  • "The tool's price is normal. It is not very cheap but good compared to the competitors."
  • More Netskope Private Access Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ZTNA as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
    771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable aspect is its ability to restrict unauthorized access, ensuring that only approved devices can connect to the network. T
    Top Answer:The support team should be more skilled in offering assistance.
    Top Answer:Even without extensive training, if you're a proficient IT professional, you can easily configure it.
    Top Answer:The solution needs to develop faster features. Its interoperability feature is not working. It takes six months to one year for any product to implement the improvements. However, the process should… more »
    Top Answer:I use Netskope Private Access for VPN access.
    Ranking
    12th
    out of 34 in ZTNA as a Service
    Views
    1,583
    Comparisons
    993
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    1,231
    Rating
    9.5
    7th
    out of 34 in ZTNA as a Service
    Views
    1,768
    Comparisons
    1,121
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    651
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    HPE Aruba Networking
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Axis Security is a prominent enterprise security solution, specializing in Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA). The Axis Security Application Access Cloud platform is designed to secure remote access to applications and services hosted in the cloud or on-premises. It aims to simplify and enhance access controls while maintaining strong security measures.

    Axis Security's platform stands out by offering a comprehensive, cloud-native solution designed to enable secure access to private applications. Their Application Access Cloud simplifies network security, eliminating the need for traditional VPNs, and provides a more secure and efficient way to connect users to private applications, regardless of where the users or the applications are located.

    Axis Security users on PeerSpot have highlighted the ease of deployment and the non-intrusive nature of Axis Security's solution as major advantages. One IT Director noted, "The implementation was straightforward and didn’t disrupt our existing operations, which was a major plus." Another user, a Security Manager, praised the platform's robust security features, saying, "Axis Security has significantly enhanced our ability to control and monitor application access, giving us peace of mind in our security operations."

    Axis Security follows the principles of zero-trust architecture, which means it treats every access request as potentially untrusted, regardless of the user's location or network. It applies rigorous authentication and authorization controls to ensure only authorized users can access specific applications and resources. Axis Security enables secure remote access to applications and services without requiring a VPN (Virtual Private Network). It establishes a secure connection between users and applications, protecting against potential threats and reducing the attack surface.

    With Axis Security, organizations can granularly control user access to specific applications or services. This ensures that users only have access to the resources they need, reducing the risk of unauthorized access or data breaches. The platform simplifies access management by providing a centralized control point for managing user access policies. IT administrators can define access rules based on user roles, groups, or other criteria, making it easier to enforce security policies and maintain compliance.

    Axis Security continuously monitors user activity and application access, detecting potential threats and anomalies in real-time. It provides insights into user behavior, allowing organizations to identify and mitigate security risks promptly.

    Axis Security is built on a cloud-native architecture, allowing it to scale and adapt to dynamic cloud environments. It can seamlessly integrate with various cloud services and supports hybrid deployments, making it suitable for organizations with diverse infrastructure setups.

      Axis Security aims to provide secure and simplified remote access to applications while adhering to the principles of zero trust. By implementing granular access controls and continuous monitoring, it helps organizations protect their critical resources and reduce the risk of unauthorized access or data breaches.

      Netskope Private Access is an integral component of the Netskope Security Cloud platform that provides zero-trust secure access to enterprise applications and data in hybrid IT (public cloud and data center) environments. It offers comprehensive policy management, compliance assessment, and supports any application, protocol, and device to reduce risk and simplify security operations.

      Sample Customers
      Cardenas Markets, Armis, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Visionworks
      Evalueserve, Stroock, Apria, Ather Energy
      Top Industries
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Computer Software Company18%
      Educational Organization14%
      Financial Services Firm6%
      Manufacturing Company6%
      REVIEWERS
      Non Profit14%
      Financial Services Firm14%
      Computer Software Company14%
      Energy/Utilities Company14%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Computer Software Company14%
      Financial Services Firm13%
      Manufacturing Company11%
      Energy/Utilities Company7%
      Company Size
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Small Business30%
      Midsize Enterprise24%
      Large Enterprise47%
      REVIEWERS
      Small Business29%
      Midsize Enterprise21%
      Large Enterprise50%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Small Business17%
      Midsize Enterprise11%
      Large Enterprise71%
      Buyer's Guide
      Axis Security vs. Netskope Private Access
      May 2024
      Find out what your peers are saying about Axis Security vs. Netskope Private Access and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
      771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.

      Axis Security is ranked 12th in ZTNA as a Service with 5 reviews while Netskope Private Access is ranked 7th in ZTNA as a Service with 14 reviews. Axis Security is rated 9.6, while Netskope Private Access is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Axis Security writes "Easy to deploy, improved reliability and performance of our connectivity, and greatly reduced costs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Netskope Private Access writes "Provides network visibility, infrastructure protection and advanced security protections, especially the DLP (Data Loss Protection)". Axis Security is most compared with Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, Netskope , Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Fortinet FortiGate SWG and Cato SASE Cloud Platform, whereas Netskope Private Access is most compared with Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Appgate SDP, Cisco Secure Client and Google BeyondCorp Remote Access. See our Axis Security vs. Netskope Private Access report.

      See our list of best ZTNA as a Service vendors.

      We monitor all ZTNA as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.