NetApp BlueXP Reviews

NetApp BlueXP allows me to store and share large amounts of my digital data across physical and hybrid cloud environments, which is the main purpose of utilizing this solution.

The features I have found to be most valuable with NetApp BlueXP include easy control of workflow orchestration and automation, as well as making access control across the hybrid and multi-cloud architecture.

NetApp BlueXP has improved my organization overall by using artificial intelligence; it automatically scans, analyzes, and characterizes data across various types of workloads, and it is helping my business identify personally sensitive information across my data lake.

In terms of areas where NetApp BlueXP can be improved, I focus on privacy and governance.

What I mean by this is that personally sensitive information in the interface needs to be encrypted, which is called privacy. As per the governance policy, that is for data security governance policy, it also needs to have a specific policy on how this data has been categorized.

If I had the opportunity to add a feature or function to NetApp BlueXP, I would ensure that privacy and governance are taken care of properly.

Before using NetApp BlueXP, I was not using a different storage management solution.

On a scale of one being low and ten being high, I would rate the stability of NetApp BlueXP as very good, stable, and scalable.

I would evaluate the support team of NetApp BlueXP as strong, giving it a nine, where one is bad and ten is excellent.

Before using NetApp BlueXP, I was not using a different storage management solution.

NetApp BlueXP has an easy initial setup.

This was done in-house.

I think the cost of NetApp BlueXP is worth the money at the end of the day; it definitely satisfies the requirements, so it is definitely a return on investment for me.

NetApp BlueXP provides me with a unified control plane.

I would assess NetApp BlueXP's ability to consolidate tool sets and frameworks as very strong; it ensures my data management by storage, mobility, protection, and analysis and control, so discovering, deployment and managing storage are all of the real strong features for it.

My advice to someone that is interested in using NetApp BlueXP is that if you want to manage all your storage and data assets from a single interface, you should consider this solution. I would give this product an overall rating of 9 out of 10.

The purpose of the product is for storage. We are using it regularly.

The best features for Pure are user-friendly GUI and fast performance, bandwidth-wise and high-load VMWare and critical databases, which will suit for EverPure. Performance tuning and performance optimization have been very useful in my experience. Regarding advanced backup strategies, we are using Cohesity as a backup tool. On the DR cluster side, snapshots and everything are possible in Pure, so we are using snapshot technology to preserve backups and DR replications.

Improvement-wise, they are releasing patches every six months, and as of now, my understanding is that it is good. They are enhancing their product's user-friendly GUI each time, so if we think it should be better, it is enhanced in the next quarter or something six months later. The product is pretty much good.

My thoughts on pricing are that it is expensive.

I have been using this product for three years. Approximately, we are about three to four years as users of the product.

Stability-wise, the product is also good, and I rate it at nine.

Regarding scalability, I rate it at ten.

I rate the technical support an eight out of ten.

NetApp BlueXP is in the market standard as of now; NAS-wise, NetApp is pretty much good, while SAN, FC side, Pure is good.

All Pure products are very much compatible with cloud providers like AWS, Azure, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud, maintaining a high level of compatibility-wise and security-wise, and are very much advanced and very useful. I definitely will recommend this product because if you have high-performance databases, critical production databases, and heavy vCenter's workload, then it should be the best option. I rate this review nine point five out of ten.

My main use case for NetApp BlueXP is cloud storage management, backup, and disaster recovery, and it is very easy to manage the persistent storage that runs on Kubernetes or OpenShift. Data migration is also a typical use case for our organization.

In some of our Amazon Kubernetes clusters, NetApp BlueXP helps us take backups, including application backup and application manifest backup. If anything fails, we can automatically restore since we have already scheduled the cron job using it, storing the backup for recovery. Additionally, it is very helpful for data migrations, allowing us to move data from cloud to cloud or from bare metal to cloud easily.

The best features NetApp BlueXP offers, in my experience, include a single dashboard for every operation, which helps reduce manual work. It has a great dashboard with better visibility and works across multiple clouds, whether in a hybrid or multiple cloud environments.

The dashboard helps my team day-to-day by providing a very easy-to-use UI that is not too complex. We can easily add cloud details, create buckets, and manage all the information for backup. The operations are GUI-based, making it very helpful for configuring these tasks without using complex CLI commands.

NetApp BlueXP positively impacts my organization by providing good integration with NetApp storage including ONTAP and Trident, along with built-in monitoring and alerts. It saves a lot of time and reduces the in-field engineers' costs.

I chose eight out of ten because the UI is slow sometimes, and the initial configuration is a bit complex. The license cost is also high compared to other products.

I have been using NetApp BlueXP for the last two years.

NetApp BlueXP is very stable in my experience with no issues related to downtime or reliability.

NetApp BlueXP's scalability meets our needs well since it is a SaaS-based product managed by the backend OEM teams. There is no downtime or maintenance downtime, making it very helpful during scaling and allowing easy data movement to the cloud. I have not faced any challenges with scalability.

Customer support for NetApp BlueXP is very good. We get timely access whenever we need support related to the product, which is enterprise-level support. However, I have not received a support plan that increases case priority according to our use cases.

We have been using NetApp BlueXP from the start and did not evaluate other options since we adopted NetApp BlueXP from the beginning.

The setup and initial configuration of NetApp BlueXP are a bit complex.

Since using NetApp BlueXP, we have seen a return on investment by saving time as we manage multiple tools more efficiently. It directly saves money, enhances backup security with built-in security and compliance, and makes scaling easy, allowing us to move data to clouds effortlessly.

Related to pricing, this is managed by the financial team, but I understand it is a bit high. Compared to competitors including Dell PowerStore, Dell APEX, and IBM Spectrum, these are slightly less expensive than NetApp BlueXP.

If your use case involves backing up data from the cloud or transitioning data from on-prem to cloud or between multiple or hybrid clouds, NetApp BlueXP is a very good tool. With a minimal single dashboard, you can manage every aspect, and you get excellent customer support whenever required, facilitating integration with multiple storage backends including any cloud storage or on-prem storage such as NetApp or Dell.

My central use case is for CVO, for cloud volume on top, and for administration with Google.

NetApp BlueXP is a good solution because we did not have another solution for CVO administration. I like NetApp BlueXP; it is good. I am using the unified visibility feature. NetApp BlueXP helps with managing compliance and security policies. For all of NetApp BlueXP, I think nine in general. I like that I worked with NetApp interface before, and NetApp BlueXP is almost the same. It is really good.

It is not easy to integrate with Google because if we have some problems, we must talk with Google and NetApp support. However, they do not speak with each other, so I must explain the same problem to Google and then explain the same problem to NetApp support.

The only challenge I faced when deploying it was deploying agents in NetApp BlueXP. The problem was that we had no documentation about deployment.

They could improve their response time, as it is too long. It could also be expensive to scale to a large scale.

I have not implemented advanced data backup strategies; this is not for backup. I do not use AI here; we do not use AI analytics. The reason I am not using it is that we do not need it. We do not use automated data tiering from the S.

For the data integration part, we are working with Google. The only downside regarding integration with Google is that it is quite complex when I have to explain the same issue twice.

I would rate NetApp BlueXP's help with managing compliance and security policies at eight for the visibility feature only. I rate it eight because if you do not use this instrument for administration early, it is difficult.

It was not my choice; I simply started working with the product they already had.

I rate this review nine overall.

We primarily use the solution as storage for our media files. We have an online system. The processing is also being done on that storage server. It's like native storage.

It's improved our data management significantly. The performance and transfer of data have improved significantly.

The security functionality is very good. We are much more secure now. 

It has improved our disaster recovery. We now have a good disaster program in place thanks to BlueXP.

BlueXP assists us with AI-driven data operations.

The dashboard management could be improved. 

I've used the solution for about ten years. 

The stability is excellent. I would rate it ten out of ten.

The scalability is good. I'd rate it eight out of ten. We have around 150 people using the solution currently.

We haven't had any issues with technical support.

We previously used Dell. We were promised a much more stable, robust solution and so we switched. It also had the size we needed to fit our requirements.

The initial setup was moderate. I'd rate the experience six out of ten. The deployment itself took a couple of days. 

We had an integrator assist us with the implementation. 

We have witnessed an ROI in terms of the output of the team. It's helped us speed up our work. We've noted a 60% increase in performance. 

The pricing is reasonable. I'd rate the affordability seven out of ten.

I'm a customer.

I'd recommend the solution to others due to the fact that it is stable, offers good performance, remains robust, and has helpful services.

I would rate the product eight out of ten.

The solution mirrors the data from on-prem to the cloud. BlueXP is software that sits on the cloud, and it's able to look into the data and extract it. We use it for data extraction.

The solution is from NetApp. It's treated like an individual solution. However, it's a full product. It's a backup and recovery tool.

The software interface can extract the data from the backend effectively.

It's a good solution as it natively integrates with other NetApp tools, and they can all work together as one product.

It's useful that it is a single solution.

It's a very expensive product. However, there are no other options if you go ahead with the NetApp product. You can't use other solutions to do this type of activity under NetApp. NetApp does not make it easy for you to integrate with other outside solutions.

The speed of the solution could be better. Sometimes it is pretty slow, depending on the environment.

In the first few versions, we were not able to browse and look into other storage types that replicated from on-premises. However, they've since updated the software. 

I have only used the solution for two years. 

The stability is rock-solid. I've never had any serious problems. I'd rate the stability ten out of ten. 

We're a pretty big company. This solution covers tens of thousands of users. 

The solution is very scalable. You can upload hyperscalers in the cloud. Id's rate the scalability ten out of ten.

The initial setup is straightforward. It took a few hours to set up.

For maintenance, we have a third-party vendor that's helping us with support and lifecycle management of IT assets. There's a team of six people managing the maintenance. They are architects.

We had a third party assist us with the deployment of the solution. 

The solution is expensive. However, it is in line with what other operators are offering. We do have a separate team that manages licensing. I'd rate the affordability of pricing at five or six out of ten.

There are no extra expenses over and above the core licensing cost.

We did look into Azure File Services and Commvault. We also considered VMware. This solution was the only one that had full integration with NetApp and Azure. 

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. It's good. 

I'd recommend the solution to others. 

We use BlueXP to manage the data in our two data centers and on the cloud. 

The primary benefit is that it simplifies data management. We face a lot of classification issues with our customers. They need to classify data, but they don't know how to do it. We can help them do it using BlueXP Datasense.

The data migration tools are excellent. Once you have clusters in Blue XP, everything is easy. It's perfect for the guys in our office who don't understand storage as much because they don't need to go into system manager. They can use BlueXP to drag and drop things instead of configuring things the old way. It's a great graphical difference. BlueXP offers a unified control panel that does just about everything we need right now. Everything is integrated so well.

The VMware capabilities can be improved. 

We have used BlueXP since it came out a year ago, but we previously used it when it was called Cloud Manager.  

The stability is acceptable. I've never had an issue with it. The performance depends on where you install it. We primarily install it locally. Most people use on-prem NetApp, so the performance comes down to their box.

We provide level one and two support for NetApp to our clients in New Zealand. We only deal with the vendor when it gets to level three. 

Positive

We used Cloud Insights when it was a standalone tool before it was integrated into BlueXP. The integration with BlueXP makes it even better.

In the cloud, I can just provision it, so it's simple. On-site, I can spin up a Linux VM and install Linux in half an hour.

We see a return from having the ability to do things very quickly. We can work faster by dragging and dropping things around instead of using the command line or the standard system manager GUI. We had a customer who didn't know that it could migrate from the ONTAP solution we had in New Zealand to San Francisco. He's now doing that. 

BlueXP itself is free. For other things, it comes down to how much you're willing to spend on things like Cloud DataSense. If somebody sees the value in it, they'll buy it. We struggle in New Zealand trying to sell these features to people. 

I rate BlueXP 10 out of 10. 

We use it for all the different environments we have, such as on-premises, Azure, and AWS clouds.

One of the main challenges we faced was the need for a single point of entry for all our system managers and NetApp BlueXP solution helped us overcome this challenge.

It provides us with a quick and simple overview of all our systems. BlueXP provides us with a unified control pane. 

The most valuable feature is the ability to view all our different systems in one place. That's the most important feature for us.

The visibility into the storage is simple and easy to use. You can navigate to SCM or Volumes with just a few clicks.

Integration with other NetApp tools like Cloud Insights and SnapCenter would be beneficial.

I have been using this solution for a year. 

Performance could be a little better. In my opinion, it's a bit slow. If you click on something, it takes a while for the data to load. I can't understand why because it's just pulling data from all the different clouds, but that could be improved. 

The scalability is okay. 

The customer service and support are good because if I pick up the phone and call a guy, I get an answer.

Positive

The deployment was very simple. 

It involved discovering the systems and entering an IP address, user ID, and password, and the systems were integrated into the NetApp BlueXP environment.

We worked directly with NetApp's team. 

NetApp BlueXP was our first choice. 

Our goal is to minimize the number of tools we use. We prefer to stick with NetApp products whenever possible to avoid introducing third-party tools.

Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten.

We use the solution to deploy CBOs in AWS and Azure. 

NetApp BlueXP makes it easier to deliver products and manage inventory. 

We can manage multiple systems from a single point. The tool makes it easy to deploy CBOs. 

The tool needs to make its licensing pages more user-friendly. 

I have been using NetApp BlueXP since 2017. 

The tool's stability is not perfect, but pretty good. 

NetApp BlueXP is scalable. 

I love the tool's support model. We purchased a specialized support model. They are very responsive. 

Positive

The tool's deployment was straightforward. It is easy to add devices. 

We have seen ROI with the tool's use. 

NetApp BlueXP has reduced the time to prepare and create a new CBO. It has reduced our delivery time. 

I rate the product an eight out of ten.