Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

What is Kemp LoadMaster?

Featured Kemp LoadMaster reviews

Kemp LoadMaster mindshare

As of August 2025, the mindshare of Kemp LoadMaster in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category stands at 7.3%, up from 7.1% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Kemp LoadMaster7.3%
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)15.7%
NetScaler14.4%
Other62.6%
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

PeerResearch reports based on Kemp LoadMaster reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryApplication Delivery Controllers (ADC)Aug 27, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersAug 27, 2025Download
ComparisonKemp LoadMaster vs NetScalerAug 27, 2025Download
ComparisonKemp LoadMaster vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)Aug 27, 2025Download
ComparisonKemp LoadMaster vs Microsoft Azure Application GatewayAug 27, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway3.77.6%79%48 interviewsAdd to research
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)4.115.7%83%122 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business20
Midsize Enterprise12
Large Enterprise13
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business135
Midsize Enterprise112
Large Enterprise232
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
University
7%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Retailer
5%
Comms Service Provider
5%
Educational Organization
5%
Real Estate/Law Firm
4%
Media Company
4%
Insurance Company
4%
Hospitality Company
3%
Healthcare Company
3%
Legal Firm
3%
Construction Company
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Non Profit
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
2%
Performing Arts
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Renewables & Environment Company
1%
Marketing Services Firm
1%

Compare Kemp LoadMaster with alternative products

Learn more about Kemp LoadMaster

Kemp LoadMaster customers

Related questions

 
Kemp LoadMaster Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Information Security Engineer at BOK4.5I used Trend Micro Deep Security mainly for virtual patching and IPS on critical servers, and Kemp LoadMaster was easy to set up but had licensing challenges that led us to stop using it despite its good performance.
Associate Engineer at AST4.0I use Kemp LoadMaster primarily for its effective security and improved traffic distribution performance. However, update challenges, slow support, and lacking features like DDoS mitigation limit its capabilities. I’m considering F5 for its broader range of features.
Senior Consultant at a tech services company with 51-200 employees5.0I use Kemp LoadMaster to replace Microsoft Forefront Threat Management Gateway and balance loads for various applications, including Microsoft Exchange and SQL Server. Its Edge Security Pack is valuable, but better TCP packet reporting is needed. I haven't compared it with Citrix NetScaler.
General Manager at Seriti Resources4.5I use Kemp LoadMaster for application load balancing and find it easy to deploy and understand. However, I struggle with pulling a specific server and redirecting IPs, as the DevOps features and knowledge base need improvement.
IT Director at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees4.5No summary available
System Specialist at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees4.5I installed the Kemp LoadMaster as recommended by Microsoft for a major customer to front an exchange platform. While it offers numerous features, we only utilize a small fraction. Initial cluster setup issues were resolved over time.
Owner at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees4.5My primary use case for Kemp LoadMaster is load balancing, especially with various algorithms. However, the layer seven load balancing for web servers needs improvement as it struggles with application-level issues. Previously, we used Microsoft's inbuilt network load balancer.
Solution Architect at ReDoy Corporation4.5I use Kemp LoadMaster primarily as an application load balancer for web-based software. The solution is well-priced. However, the ability to analyze live traffic needs improvement, and its graphics require enhancement.