Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
IBM SAN Volume Control Logo

IBM SAN Volume Control Reviews

Vendor: IBM
4.6 out of 5

What is IBM SAN Volume Control?

Featured IBM SAN Volume Control reviews

IBM SAN Volume Control mindshare

As of March 2026, the mindshare of IBM SAN Volume Control in the Storage Management category stands at 4.3%, down from 6.4% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Storage Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
IBM SAN Volume Control4.3%
NetApp OnCommand Insight6.6%
Dell Storage Resource Manager (SRM)5.8%
Other83.3%
Storage Management
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Mar 27, 2026

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Pricing

 
IBM SAN Volume Control Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Senior Manager ICT & at Bangalore International Airport Limited4.0I appreciate IBM SAN Volume Control for its ultra-low latency, cost and performance optimization, and minimal power consumption. However, enhancements are needed in patch management and storage expansion. Overall, it offers good ROI with reliable security features.
Head of Database Administration, SAN and Storage Infrastructure at United Bulgarian Bank AD5.0I rate this solution 10/10 for its ease of use, configuration, and excellent support. My main wish is for improved virtualized storage box capacity and an upgrade to our SAN infrastructure.
Senior Services Engineer at KENAC COMPUTER SYSTEMS4.5I use IBM SAN Volume Control for heterogeneous storage management, valuing its copy services, performance metrics, and analysis. It could benefit from improved integration with other vendor systems, yet it's shown a positive ROI, making it worth the investment.
Sales Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees5.0I find IBM SAN Volume Control easy to manage for migrations, stable, and scalable, offering good ROI and flexible licensing. My primary concern is the outdated snapshot functionality, which relies on flash copy instead of competitor-like snap volumes, an area needing significant improvement.
Storage and Backups Manager at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees4.5I find SAN Volume Controller's virtualization layer excellent for diverse storage. However, I am frustrated by IBM's slow support and high per-terabyte licensing costs. Despite these issues, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.