IBM Cloud Object Storage Reviews

IBM Cloud Object Storage offers flexible pricing with monthly or yearly licenses, with most opting for monthly plans. Organizations can select from four storage types, affecting cost based on performance needs. High-performance options are pricier, while cold data storage is more affordable. Adding storage incurs the same cost as a new purchase without discounts. Pricing per gigabyte or terabyte remains competitive, often cheaper than AWS, depending on specific storage requirements.

• "Like most cloud providers, IBM likely charges based on storage capacity, typically per gigabyte or terabyte. Their pricing is competitive when compared to AWS or Microsoft."
• "IBM Cloud is cheaper than AWS. If you want to scale your cloud infrastructure, it can be bought at almost the same price."
• "You have the option of a monthly or yearly license. Most customers choose the monthly option. I understand what you would like to say. IBM also lets you choose among four types of Cloud Object Storage. The difference is usage, performance, etc. Of course, high-performance storage is more expensive, while low-performance storage is for cold data, and it's really cheap."

Organizations primarily use IBM Cloud Object Storage for backend storage and backups, especially with Spectrum Protect. It aids in uploading and managing images and files, including VMDK and VISTA, across platforms like Amazon and Google. It's essential for spreading systems across multiple sites and supporting automotive IoT and big data as initial storage. Businesses leverage it for unstructured data needs and integrating Watson's AI for supply chain insights. Pricing is competitive, but data center availability can be a limitation.

IBM Cloud Object Storage has positive feedback for technical support. Users appreciate the effective ticketing system with prompt responses. However, there's dissatisfaction with spare parts delivery in traditional data centers. The cloud center excels with readily available parts. Complexity in integration with third-party software is an area for improvement. Users value the flexibility in partner switching but are uncertain about IBM's fairness. Technical support understanding varies, impacting resolution speed for complex issues.

IBM Cloud Object Storage's initial setup is simple and user-friendly. Many find the integrations seamless with platforms like Teradata, NetApp, and Dell EMC ECS. It can be completed within a few clicks, without facing complexity. Technical skills may affect the experience, yet resources like TechU conferences simplify the process. Although API documentation might pose a challenge, creating buckets and configuring access keys usually takes about a day, highlighting its efficiency.

IBM Cloud Object Storage offers scalable capabilities through integration of various products. Scalability is influenced by region, with multiple data centers enhancing capacity. Space is easily increased via the console. Users can scale by adding nodes or expanding licenses, even supporting large numbers of files and users. Each organization has experienced seamless expansion, tapping into infinite capacity in areas like Germany, although single data center locations might face potential capacity constraints.

IBM Cloud Object Storage is widely regarded as stable. Users appreciate its rock-solid performance and built-in redundancy, offering regional or global replicas to access data even if the main site fails. Many rate stability at nine or ten out of ten, highlighting its resilience and hassle-free access. While occasional issues arise, they often relate to specific components rather than core stability. Some encountered bugs in the free version but still rated stability highly.