Hyperglance: Up to 500 Resources Reviews

My main use case is to get a clear view of cloud resources in one place and understand how they are connected. It helps in checking resource usage, monitoring the overall infrastructure, and identifying areas where we can reduce unnecessary costs.

It is especially useful when managing resources across different cloud environments and keeping everything organized.

Hyperglance has made it easier for our team to get an overall view of our cloud resources without checking everything separately.

The visual representation helps us understand how different resources are connected and makes it easier to spot areas that need attention. It also helps us identify resources that may not be used properly and look for ways to control cloud costs.

This saves some time and makes managing infrastructure less complicated. Overall, it has improved visibility and made it easier for our team to keep track of cloud resources.

The visual mapping of cloud resources is one of the most useful features for me because it makes the overall infrastructure easier to understand.

I also like having resources from different cloud platforms visible in one place instead of checking each platform separately.

The cost optimization feature is helpful too, as it gives us a way to identify resources that may be wasting money. Overall, these features make cloud management more organized and help save time when checking the infrastructure.

I think the dashboard could be a little more user-friendly, especially for people who are using the platform for the first time.

Sometimes, finding specific information in a large cloud setup can take extra time. It would also be good to have more customization options for dashboards and reports.

In the next release, I would like to see better cost alerts, more detailed usage reports, and easier ways to identify unused resources.

These improvements would make Hyperglance more convenient for daily use and help teams manage cloud resources more efficiently.

1 Year

It feels like a useful tool for keeping cloud resources organised and easy to understand. Having everything visible in one place makes it easier to review the setup and keep track of different resources. Overall, it seems practical for day-to-day cloud management, though stability also depends on the environment and usage.

Hyperglance makes it easier to manage cloud resources as the infrastructure grows. I like that I can get a clear view of different resources in one place instead of checking everything separately. For an environment with up to 500 resources, it seems like a useful solution to keep things organised and easier to monitor.

The initial setup was fairly straightforward. It was easy to get started, and the interface was simple enough to understand without spending too much time figuring things out. A little time is needed to get familiar with the different options, but overall, the setup experience was smooth.

Hyperglance can help save time by showing cloud resources and their connections in one place. This makes it easier to understand the infrastructure without checking multiple screens or tools separately. The main value for me is better visibility and less manual effort, although I haven't measured the exact ROI in numbers.

I would suggest checking your cloud setup and requirements before choosing a plan. If you are managing a smaller environment, the option for up to 500 resources may be worth considering. Also, compare the pricing with other tools and check which features are included in the plan. In my opinion, it is better to choose a plan that fits your actual usage rather than paying for features you may not need. Make sure to consider the long-term value and potential cloud cost savings before making a decision.

We also looked at other cloud management options such as AWS CloudWatch, Microsoft Azure Monitor, and CloudHealth.

We wanted a solution that could give us a clear view of cloud resources without making things too complicated. Hyperglance stood out because of its visual representation of infrastructure and the ability to see resources in one place.

Overall, Hyperglance is a useful tool for managing cloud resources in one place. I would recommend checking the available features and pricing to see if it fits your team's needs.

We use it primarily for mapping out new client cloud architectures during onboarding and tracking untagged, unused, or oversized AWS/Azure resources to control their monthly cloud spend.

It significantly cut down our onboarding time for new client accounts. Instead of our team leads spending days manually digging through AWS and Azure consoles to document what is running, we get an auto-generated map right away.

It also helped us catch idle resources that were running up client costs unnecessarily, making our FinOps reporting much more accurate.

The automated architecture mapping combined with the cost and compliance overlays. Being able to see resource relationships visually while simultaneously spotting security misconfigurations or unattached storage saves a lot of back-and-forth during client audits.

The UI can still feel a bit cluttered and sluggish when client accounts approach the resource limit, so better default filtering out of the box would help.

Custom reporting rules could also be more intuitive to set up without needing as much trial and error.

I have been using the solution for about 1.5 years.

We were mostly relying on manual Lucidchart diagrams and native AWS/Azure billing dashboards.

Keeping diagrams up to date manually was impossible as client setups changed, so we switched to Hyperglance for automated, real-time mapping.

The Up to 500 Resources tier runs around $900 a month, which might feel a bit steep for smaller teams.

However, since they price based on your resource count rather than taking a percentage of your total cloud bill, the costs stay predictable.

If your team actively uses it to find unattached volumes and idle instances across client accounts, the tool easily pays for itself.

We evaluated CloudZero and Flexera. CloudZero is solid for cost tracking, but we really needed the automated architecture diagramming to help with client onboarding.

Flexera was another option, but it felt a bit too heavy and complex to deploy for our specific BPO use case.

Take your time during the initial setup. If you plug it into a massive, messy cloud account without configuring your filters first, the auto-generated diagrams will be overwhelming to read.

Spend a few days dialing in the filters and custom reporting rules, and it will save your operations team hours of manual work every month.

My primary use case of Hyperglance is to get a clear view of our cloud infrastructure in one place. It helps visualize cloud resources, understand how different components are connected, and identify potential issues or areas that need attention. Having everything organized in a single view makes it easier to monitor the environment and manage resources more efficiently. I also use it to check resource dependencies and spot unused or misconfigured resources that might increase cloud costs. The visual diagrams are especially helpful when troubleshooting issues because I can quickly understand how different services are connected without checking each resource manually.

Hyperglance has made it easier to understand and manage our cloud infrastructure by bringing resource information and connections into one visual view. One specific use case is reviewing our AWS environment to see how EC2 instances, VPCs, subnets, and security groups are connected. This helps us trace dependencies when investigating connectivity issues and identify resources that may need configuration changes. It also saves time compared with manually checking each resource in the AWS console. Overall, Hyperglance provides a clearer picture of our cloud setup and helps us make better-informed decisions about resource management and infrastructure optimization.

The features I find most valuable in Hyperglance are cloud infrastructure visualization, resource dependency mapping, and the ability to view multiple AWS resources in one place. For example, when investigating a connectivity issue between an EC2 instance and other services, the visual map helps me understand how the instance, VPC subnet, and security groups are connected. This makes it easier to trace dependencies and identify configurations that may need further investigation. As a result, we can narrow down potential causes more quickly, reduce manual cross-checking in the AWS console, and make troubleshooting more organized. Overall, Hyperglance gives us a clear picture of our cloud environment and helps us make better-informed infrastructure management decisions.

I would like to see more detailed filtering options for large AWS environments, especially when searching for specific EC2 instances, security groups, or network dependencies. It would also be helpful to have clear alerts for misconfigured resources, and more actionable reports and customizable dashboards would make it easier to share findings with the team and track infrastructure issues over time.

I have used the solution for two years.

Before using Hyperglance, I mainly relied on the AWS management console to review cloud resources and understand their connections. Hyperglance offers a more visual way to explore infrastructure dependencies, making it easier to get an overview of the environment without manually checking each resource.

I recommend Hyperglance to small and mid-size teams that need better visibility into their AWS infrastructure. Before buying, check whether the 500 resource plan fits your needs and compare the cost with your budget. If you manage a growing cloud environment, review the upgrade pricing to avoid unexpected expenses later.

We considered using the native AWS management console and AWS configure to understand our cloud resources and their relationships. Hyperglance stood out for its visual infrastructure mapping, which makes it easier to see resource dependencies and get an overall view of the cloud environment.

Overall, Hyperglance is worth considering for teams that want a clear visual understanding of their cloud infrastructure. I find resource mapping and dependency visibility particularly useful for troubleshooting and managing AWS environments. I would recommend taking advantage of the available trial or demo before purchasing to make sure the features and 500-resource limit fit your team's needs.

The primary use or goal is to build a stack where Hyperglance identifies the problem, other tools investigate or resolve it, and my service desk tracks the work. With offices across multiple time zones and international clients, this is a must.

We pair Hyperglance with tools that fill in the gaps around it. Hyperglance is strongest at providing a centralized view of cloud infrastructure, cloud spending, security issues, and compliance. It also integrates directly with Jira, ServiceNow, and Microsoft Teams, so I can route findings into my existing workflows. The rest of our tech stack (NinjaOne, Veeam, MS Defender, etc.) also complements Hyperglance.

I like that it gives me a clear picture of my cloud environment in one place. Being able to see how everything connects and spot potential security issues or wasted spending can save time.

I would like to see an easier setup process, a simpler interface for new users, and better reporting that makes it easier to share findings with clients.

I have used it for 1 year.

I did not use any previous solutions.

It can be on the higher side for smaller teams, and it can sometimes overlap with the existing tech stack, so I need to be mindful of those things when evaluating the budget.

I considered alternate solutions like DataDog and CloudCheckr.

Not at this time.