Airlock Digital Application Control Reviews

My main use case for Airlock Digital Application Control is to enforce application allow listing across our Windows endpoints so that only approved and trusted software can run. The goal was to reduce the risk of malware, ransomware, and unauthorized applications without disrupting normal business operations.

In our day-to-day work, we use it to review requests for new software, verifying that the application is legitimate and then approve it through the appropriate policy so users can run it without needing local administrator privileges. A typical example is when a business team needs a new finance or engineering application that is not already approved. Instead of giving the user elevated access or creating broad security exceptions, we validate the software, test it on a small group of machines, understand the allow list, and then deploy the policy to the required endpoint. This process has helped us maintain tighter control over our environment while still allowing business teams to get the applications they need in a structured and auditable way. Although there is some ongoing administrative effort, especially when new software versions are released or vendors frequently update their applications, the visibility and control it provides have made endpoint management much more predictable and secure.

The best features Airlock Digital Application Control offers that stand out the most for me are the application allow listing capabilities and centralized policy management, and the visibility into what is actually running across endpoints. The allow listing approach gives us much tighter control than relying only on signature-based security tools because only trusted applications are permitted to execute, which significantly reduces the risk of unauthorized software and malware. I also value having a central console where policies can be managed and applied consistently across different groups of devices, as it makes administration much easier than maintaining separate configurations on individual endpoints. Another feature I find valuable is the ability to review application activity before making policy changes, which helps us validate software and avoid disrupting users during deployments. From an operational perspective, the audit trail is useful because it provides clear records of policy changes and application approvals, making troubleshooting and compliance discussions much simpler. These features together provide a good balance between security and day-to-day manageability without making endpoint administration overly complicated, although none of them completely eliminate the need for ongoing policy maintenance, especially in environments where applications are updated frequently.

Airlock Digital Application Control is a solid product, but there are a few areas where it could be improved. The biggest challenge is the ongoing effort required to maintain allow listing policies in the environment where applications are updated frequently. While the initial deployment can be planned carefully, keeping policies current as vendors release new versions requires regular attention, and that can become time-consuming for IT teams managing a large number of endpoints. I would appreciate seeing more automation around approving trusted software updates and better integrations with common software deployment and vulnerability management tools to reduce manual effort. Reporting is another area that could be enhanced, particularly with more customizable dashboards and easier ways to generate compliance and operational reports for different audiences. From an administration perspective, some troubleshooting workflows could be more intuitive, especially when identifying why an application was blocked or determining the exact policy responsible for the decision. These limitations have not been significant enough to outweigh the benefits of the product, but addressing them would make day-to-day management more efficient, reduce administrative overhead, and improve the overall experience for security and endpoint management teams.

One additional area for improvement is the overall user and administration experience. While the platform is functional, I think some of the management workflows could be simplified so that common tasks such as reviewing blocked applications, approving legitimate software, or tracing the reason behind a policy decision require fewer steps. For organizations with lean IT teams, a more intuitive interface and clearer guidance during policy creation would help reduce the learning curve for new administrators. I would appreciate seeing broader integrations with the endpoint management, SIEM, and IT service management platforms so application events, approval requests, and policy updates can fit more naturally into existing operational workflows. Better APIs and pre-built integrations would reduce manual work and make automation easier for larger environments. More flexible reporting and customizable dashboards would help different teams, whether security operations or compliance, quickly access the information that is most relevant to them without having to manually compile reports. Addressing these areas would improve efficiency and make the product easier to operate as organizations scale their endpoint environments.

I have been using Airlock Digital Application Control for a little over two years in a production environment, primarily as a part of our endpoint security strategy for Windows desktops and servers.

Regarding stability, the product has been reliable in our environment. We have not experienced any significant outages or stability issues with the platform itself, and once the initial policies were properly tested and defined, policy deployment was consistent across our endpoints. The few issues we encountered were generally related to a newly released application version that had not yet been added to the allow list rather than a problem with the product's reliability. Those situations were resolved by validating the software and updating the appropriate policies. The platform has been stable enough that it has become part of our standard security operation, and any day-to-day challenges have been operational rather than related to system availability or performance.

From my experience, Airlock Digital Application Control has scaled effectively as our endpoint environment has grown. As we added new user devices and business applications, we were able to extend our existing policy framework without having to redesign the entire deployment management approach. It made it straightforward to onboard new groups, apply appropriate policies, and maintain consistent security standards across the environment. We also found that creating separate policies for different departments or user groups allowed us to accommodate changing business requirements without affecting the rest of the organization. As the environment grew larger, the biggest challenge was not the platform's ability to scale but the operational effort required to keep application allow lists current and organized. Regular policy reviews, a standard approval process, and a phased deployment became increasingly important to prevent unnecessary complexity. We have not encountered any major performance or reliability issues related to growth, and the platform has continued to support our expanding endpoint environment reliably. Successful scalability depends not only on the product itself but also on having well-defined governance and policy management processes in place.

My experience with Airlock Digital's customer support has been positive, and I would rate it eight out of ten. We have not had to contact support very often because the platform has been stable, but on the few occasions when we did, mainly during deployment and when we needed clarification on policy behavior or best practices for handling specific application scenarios, the team was responsive and technically knowledgeable. They took the time to understand our environment instead of providing generic answers, and their suggestions helped us resolve issues without resorting to broad policy exemptions. Response times were generally reasonable, although for more complex questions that required investigation, it sometimes took longer to receive a detailed solution, which is understandable for enterprise support cases. The documentation and knowledge resources were also useful for many day-to-day questions, reducing the need to open support cases. The reason I did not give support a score higher than eight is that I think there is still room for improvement in providing even faster turnaround for complex cases, more proactive technical guidance, and a broader library of implementation examples and best practices for different deployment scenarios. The support experience has been professional and has given us confidence that assistance is available when needed.

Before adopting Airlock Digital Application Control, we relied primarily on a combination of traditional endpoint protection, Microsoft AppLocker for a limited set of systems, and manual administrative controls rather than a dedicated, enterprise-wide application control platform. While that approach provided a basic level of protection, it became increasingly difficult to manage consistently as the environment grew. Policy management was fragmented, visibility into approved and unauthorized applications was limited, and maintaining consistent application control across different endpoint groups required a significant amount of manual effort. We evaluated several application control solutions before selecting Airlock Digital Application Control. We were looking for a product that offered more centralized policy management, better visibility into application activity, and a practical way to implement application allow listings without creating unnecessary operational complexity. The transition required careful planning and policy tuning, but once the deployment was completed, administration became more structured and predictable. Airlock Digital provided a better balance between security, usability, and day-to-day management than our previous approach, which was the primary reason for making the switch.

We deployed Airlock Digital Application Control in an on-premises environment because it aligned with our organization's existing security architecture and endpoint management practice. Most of our critical systems and management infrastructure were already hosted within our own data centers, so keeping the application control management platform on-premises simplified integrations with our existing authentication services, endpoint management tools, and internal security processes. The deployment also gave us greater control over policy management, administrative access, and change management, which was important for us from both a security and a compliance perspective. Once the initial setup and policy configurations were complete, day-to-day administration was straightforward, with the policies being managed centrally and distributed to endpoints as a part of our standard operation process. Although an on-premises deployment requires us to maintain the underlying infrastructure, it has provided the level of control, stability, and predictability we were looking for, and it has integrated well with the rest of our enterprise environment.

We have seen positive returns on investment, although it has been more apparent in the reduced operational effort and improved security than in direct headcount savings. Before implementing Airlock Digital Application Control, our IT team spent a noticeable amount of time investigating incidents caused by unauthorized software and responding to requests related to unapproved applications. After introducing application allow listing and establishing a structured approval process, those incidents became much less frequent. We estimated that support tickets related to unauthorized software decreased by around thirty-five to forty percent, and the time spent investigating suspicious or unknown executables was reduced from several hours to less than thirty minutes because administrators could quickly verify application status through centralized policies and audit records. Routine software approval requests also became more predictable, with most standard requests being completed within one business day instead of taking several days. While we did not reduce the size of the IT team, the time saved allowed administrators to focus on higher-value activities such as security improvements, endpoint life cycle management, and proactive projects instead of repetitive troubleshooting. From a business perspective, avoiding even a single significant malware or ransomware incident would justify much of the investment. The improvements in operational efficiency, security, and risk reduction have made the solution worthwhile for us.

The pricing and licensing model for Airlock Digital Application Control was relatively straightforward and easy to understand compared to some other enterprise security products we evaluated. We licensed the solution based on the size of our endpoint environment, which made it easier to estimate costs during budgeting and future planning. The initial setup cost was reasonable because the deployment did not require significant additional infrastructure beyond what we already had in place. Although we did invest time in planning, policy creation, testing, and administrator training to ensure a smooth rollout, the larger investment was in the implementation effort rather than the software itself, particularly during the early stages when we were building and refining application allow listing policies. Once the environment was stabilized, ongoing licensing and operational costs were predictable and fit within our security budget. The overall value was justified by the increased control over application execution, the reduction in security risks, and the operational improvements we gained. The only area where I think there is room for improvement is providing even greater flexibility in licensing options for organizations with mixed environments or rapidly changing endpoint counts, but overall, we found the commercial model fair and transparent.

Before selecting Airlock Digital Application Control, we evaluated a few different approaches, including Microsoft AppLocker, Microsoft Defender Application Control, formerly Windows Defender Application Control, and a couple of other endpoint security solutions that included application control capabilities as a part of a broader endpoint protection platform. Our evaluation focused on how easy each solution was to deploy and manage, the level of policy granularity, reporting, day-to-day administration, and the impact on end users. Airlock Digital stood out because it offered a good balance between strong application allow listing capabilities and operational simplicity, making it a better fit for our team's requirements.

My advice to others looking into using Airlock Digital Application Control would be to spend as much time planning your application control strategy as you do evaluating the product. The technology is only one part of a successful implementation. Having a clear understanding of your software inventory, business-critical software, and an approval process will make the rollout much smoother. I would recommend starting with a pilot group that represents different business functions so you can identify legitimate applications that need to be allowed before expanding the deployment across the organization. It is also important to involve the endpoint management, security, and application owners early in the process so everyone understands how software requests and policy changes will be handled. Once the solution is in production, establish a regular process for reviewing policies, validating new application versions, and removing old rules to keep the environment manageable over time. Application control should not be expected to work as a standalone security measure. It delivers the best results when it is integrated into a comprehensive endpoint security strategy alongside endpoint detection and response, vulnerability management, patching, and user awareness. Approaching implementation with good planning, realistic expectations, and a strong operational process will allow application control to provide effective protection without unnecessary disruption for end users or administrators. I would rate this product an eight out of ten overall.

We use Airlock Digital Application Control for endpoint management, for protection and management of shadow IT, not in a punitive sense, but if we find people trying to use unapproved software, we try and point them to approved software to minimize our risk profile while maximizing the value. We call all of our employees owners, so when I say owners, that is what I am talking about. For our owners, for example, at one point, BioCryst had 74 different zip tools in their total environment, and by getting it down to one, we reduced license costs, we reduced the risk profile from having lots of different unpatched software. We got all of them up to date, so we were no longer running out-of-date software, and the experience for our owners was better, and the protection for the enterprise was better.

With Airlock Digital Application Control, we have to make sure the versions on the endpoints are up to date, but that is managed as part of the tool. We do tracking and reporting to make sure that all of the systems are up to date, and there are occasional requirements where something broke on an endpoint, and we have to manually reinstall it. But we had 800 endpoints all told, and I think we had to reinstall it less than 20 times manually, so it was not exactly common. But because we could feed the reporting into Splunk, it was easy to catch because Airlock Digital Application Control is not stellar necessarily about giving you a good report that says this machine has not checked in in a timely manner because their window is too small, and it is not really adjustable. Some of our salespeople might not turn their laptop on but once a month. Once it had not checked in for 72 hours, it just stopped doing anything. But we could see in the Splunk instance when their version got out of date, and the reporting, even though we got the data from Airlock Digital Application Control, was easier to do in Splunk. Then we would say, this one is five versions out of current, and our current is two versions off of latest. Then we would see if Airlock Digital Application Control could update it internally, and if not, we told the help desk to go manually reinstall Airlock Digital Application Control. That got it back up to date, but since it is a SaaS product, there was not server maintenance or anything we had to do.

What I like the most about Airlock Digital Application Control is that when I first joined BioCryst, they had an existing relationship to deploy Carbon Black, and Carbon Black was such a screaming nightmare because they got sold and resold and acquired six times in 14 months. So they did not know whether to scratch their ass or wind their watch, so it was kind of crazy, and their service was abysmal. The tool was still the bleeding edge of 1997, had not been updated since; it just kept getting sold. Airlock Digital Application Control is taking that Carbon Black concept, making it cloud-based, making it much more dynamic and scalable, and more reactive in terms of the reporting. Does it still have some growing pains? It does, but even on its worst day, it was head and shoulders above Carbon Black, even though at the most granular level, they did essentially the same thing, but things that we would try to do in Carbon Black would just crash in Carbon Black, and you could do in seconds or minutes in Airlock Digital Application Control.

It handled the scale with very rare exceptions; every once in a while, you would catch them when they were doing an update or something, and it would hang, but I could count that on the fingers of one hand in two years, where I could not tell you how many times a day Carbon Black was crashing because it was well into the dozens. It actually performed better. It had better granularity in reporting because we used Splunk as our SIEM for data aggregation, and it was able to set up direct data feeds, and as the environment changed, those data feeds updated. So it worked very well in a centralized reporting and tools environment, allowing us to better leverage that risk protection. We did not necessarily watch Airlock Digital Application Control every second, but we had a SOC that could run queries against that data and compare it to our CrowdStrike data and compare it to our Zscaler data and some of our other firewall data and see what was going on and where we may have opportunities for excellence.

What I dislike about Airlock Digital Application Control is that the whole endpoint management concept as implemented there is silly, and they need to have a better flow so you can appropriately do that type of work at the access control layer, not at the machine layer. If you simply take local admin away from everyone in the company, it is a way of taking local admin away without telling people you are doing that, and I think that is kind of silly. But the biggest challenge is the tool does not let you migrate information between groups, and its export function is not stellar, though it is markedly better than it was when we first started with it. If I built a group and we grew and we decided we need to change how that was organized, I had to take a buttload of screenshots to capture all of the information because there was not a way to migrate them into a new structure. That is one of the things they are working on, and it was due to be released soon, and I got laid off about eight weeks ago now, so maybe they have released it now. But that was a pain because there was no way to export it, even as a CSV, and that was annoying because it did not screenshot easily.

I have been a customer for about two years.

I have paid for enhanced support, so we have a weekly call with a technical success manager, and I have never had to call support; I called him.

The support from Airlock Digital Application Control was excellent. I am drawing a blank on his name because we had two of them, but they were top-notch. It took a little while to get the second guy up to speed, but that is normal. We had been working with the first guy for about 10 months at that point, and he got promoted; good for him. We got the new guy up to speed, and once he understood what was going on with our environment and everything, it was great. Having that regular cadence, when we had extra questions, he always responded within a timely manner. From my perspective, it was not the kind of tool that you regularly had to have an instant response, but it was rare not to have a response by the next business day, and typically we got something the same day unless I sent it at about 6:00 at night.

If I were to put their support on a scale from 1 to 10, I would give them an 8. It is not that there was any fault of the support person we had, our technical contact; it is just sometimes things that we wanted as baselines had to go into the development pipeline. He was a good advocate for us getting those into the development pipeline and giving us links so that we could go into the tool that development used to track it, so we could go in and all vote for it to bump it up in the priority.

The initial deployment of Airlock Digital Application Control was just an Intune push, and it was pretty easy. We already had a centralized management tool.

I thought the pricing for Airlock Digital Application Control was good. I was the one that negotiated the contract and was actually successful in suing Carbon Black and getting all of our money back, and then working with Airlock Digital Application Control to get a multi-year contract within that budget. They are much more cost-effective than Carbon Black, both just in terms of the flat pricing and then what you get for the pricing. We did pay extra for some of the customer service support, but it was an excellent investment to get the best return out of the environment, fast.

Airlock Digital Application Control has helped me to prevent malware within our systems. The policy change history feature did not exist when I started, but they had auditing; that is part of the policy change history. We did look and see, if something happened, who did it, so we did use the auditing.

I have indeed had experience with the bidirectional REST API; that is how Airlock Digital Application Control updated itself and updated the dashboard. We played with that a lot, especially when we were first setting it up, but once we had the key set up, it worked pretty well.

The single SKU licensing model has not affected our organization's budgeting and resource allocation for the application control. What we had was not technically one SKU because we had one SKU for the service and then we had one SKU for the support. But it is not a tool that is so granular or so fractional that you need a bunch of other SKUs. It is kind of binary; you either buy it or you do not. You either buy support or you do not. It is not like Oracle or SAP where there are 12 billion subcomponents that you have to buy individually and track, so you do not need a billion SKUs or a Microsoft SKU-of-the-week model.

If I am looking for that type of tool in another environment, I am going to reach out to them. Overall, I give Airlock Digital Application Control a solid 8.

I use Airlock Digital Application Control as part of my role in the security team managing endpoint controls and broader defensive measures. I have been working with the product as part of strengthening our application control strategy, mainly around policy design, fine-tuning, and making sure it fits business requirements without causing too much disruption.

I appreciate several aspects of Airlock Digital Application Control. What I appreciate most is that it enforces discipline in the environment. It aligns well with least privilege principles because only approved software runs. That alone removes a large category of risk that traditional reactive tools still have to chase. The organization I am working with currently uses a variety of software and applications, and thus it becomes even more necessary to have a robust mechanism to safeguard our assets. Airlock works very well in this regard.

I feel that with respect to Airlock Digital Application Control, the upgrade process is very straightforward and simple. There is no downtime required. If they roll out a new version, it is easy to upgrade to the latest version without any reboot. There is no downtime required to upgrade Airlock Digital Application Control to the latest version. This is something I really appreciate.

Another aspect I can think about is clear audit visibility. In Airlock Digital Application Control console, you are able to get a log of everything. Even if I log into the console, there is an audit that a user, Mahesh, has logged in. If someone has added some hash or any kind of whitelisting has been done, everything is recorded. I have clear audit visibility.

The most valuable part is the centralized policy management. I can have a centralized policy in place to support a list of servers. For example, I have a policy in place to protect all my workstations. Then I have a separate policy to protect my UNIX workstations. Similarly, a separate policy for Windows Server. I have centralized policy management, and it becomes very easy with respect to Airlock Digital Application Control in this regard.

The proper governance and control that Airlock Digital Application Control provides helps to improve auditability and governance over our policies. I am working with a government organization. Here we have multiple teams using their own kind of software and applications. The problem is that without proper governance, there is a chance of data leakage or any threat entering into the network, as they all use their own kind of software and USB keys. With Airlock Digital Application Control, we have proper governance in place because by default, everything is blocked. We follow the policy of zero trust. Anything which is not known is completely blocked. We ensure that only the approved software is currently allowed. We also ensure that the baselining is in place. When we use different operating systems, like Windows workstations or any kind of Windows versions or Linux versions, we ensure that the operating system is baselined, which helps to stop a lot of unwanted noise. With this, we manage the entire infrastructure.

There are a few areas of Airlock Digital Application Control that I would like to see improved or enhanced in the future. The first thing is that the new version release schedule is quite repetitive, deploying a new agent within a couple of months. This makes it difficult for us to keep in touch because we have a controlled environment, and everything must be done via change management. We cannot upgrade the server or stay up to date with the latest version all the time. Airlock Digital Application Control should release updates but also provide ample time for organizations to adapt to the latest version.

The second area for improvement I think about is regarding the workflows. The workflows require careful tuning during initial rollout, especially in dynamic environments like what we have.

My impression of the granular policy control offered by Airlock Digital Application Control is that it can still be improved. Granular policy control is much better for control and application. For metadata rules to work, all endpoints must be on a particular version or higher. Unfortunately, in our environment, we do not have all machines using the same client version, which becomes a problem. If you go to Airlock Digital Application Control, they have an answer that the best thing you can do is use the granular policy if you have all agents and endpoints on the same version. That is something we need to work upon. Granular policy is much better to control and apply, and this is my experience.

I've been using it for the past one and a half years.

When it comes to stability, I have experienced some issues with Airlock Digital Application Control in the initial versions. In the initial versions, there were issues with memory leaks. I am talking about the versions 4.8 to 5.1. Those versions had a known issue of memory leaks, which caused performance issues. However, after they rolled out 5.2.2, these issues were completely resolved, and since then, Airlock Digital Application Control is working quite well.

I find Airlock Digital Application Control very scalable. I have not seen any issues with the scalability because we have more than 20,000 endpoints, and it is working excellently. We have not faced any issues.

The technical support and customer service teams of Airlock Digital Application Control are quite good. If you ask me to rate them between zero to five, five being the best, I would give them a rating of four. The reason being that the moment you log a case with them, they reach out to you within a short period. They are always happy to come on a call. When you speak and share the problem you are facing, you can troubleshoot things much faster than via chat or email. They are always available on call, which really helps. That is why my rating is four for the support team.

Positive

Before Airlock Digital Application Control, I worked on ThreatLocker for some time. Before this organization, I was working as a security analyst in one of the banks. I had the chance, as part of the job rotation, to work with the SOC for a few months. There, I had a chance to work on ThreatLocker. However, I did not get as much exposure to ThreatLocker as I am currently getting with Airlock Digital Application Control.

I was indeed involved in the initial setup of Airlock Digital Application Control.

My experience with the initial setup of Airlock Digital Application Control was quite positive. With respect to the rollout, I would say there were not many challenges because we properly planned the entire deployment. We had apprised all stakeholders about what this product is going to do and what issues to expect once installed across all servers and endpoints. Since we took the right steps, the rollout was quite simple.

Once it was rolled out, the application team and the users faced issues, so we had to train them initially on what can be done and what needs to be done from their end. The first few months were a bit difficult for us due to many calls, tickets, and inquiries. However, once users understood the functionality and how Airlock Digital Application Control can work, things streamlined after a few months, and then everything became easy for us.

Utilizing Airlock Digital Application Control does help to prevent malware within our systems to some degree. We have something called defense-in-depth. The good thing is that because Airlock Digital Application Control works on the principle of least privilege and it works on the principle of zero trust, any new hash or software is by default blocked. This definitely helps. Since we have defense-in-depth, in case something or a threat does enter into a network, we can control it. If Airlock Digital Application Control is not able to detect it, we have different measures in place to control the malware and protect our organization.

Airlock Digital Application Control brings many main benefits to the table that help improve the way the organization functions. One thing I have noticed is that because Airlock Digital Application Control blocks everything, we must keep all the different teams together and make them understand usability. When things are blocked, if they upgrade an application, it gets blocked by Airlock Digital Application Control. We have to tell them this is very important because anything unknown will be blocked. There is an option called OTP. Using OTP, you can block, enable, and allow Airlock Digital Application Control to work. This has been a pain point for us because if a user has the ability to enable OTP and bypasses it, that negates the use of Airlock Digital Application Control. Recently, as part of the improvement measure, we have disabled the feature of OTP for users, so they cannot enable OTP at all. If they want to test an application, definitely Airlock Digital Application Control is going to block it. We have integrated Airlock Digital Application Control with our ticketing tool, ServiceNow. When a user wants to enable OTP, they must submit a request that will by default go to the manager for approval. The request comes to us, and via automation, once the request is approved, the OTP is enabled from the console, allowing that particular machine to test and run the application without issue. This is something we have worked upon.

In terms of integration and automation with Airlock Digital Application Control, what we are doing here is in the case of automation. We rely on different infra teams, like the UNIX team and the Windows team for the upgrade of the agents. What has helped is that from the console, we can perform the entire upgrade of the endpoints. We do not have to rely on the UNIX team or the Windows team because that adds to the delay based on their availability. With this automation feature from the console, after having the change approved, I have the complete control to automate and select the list of servers or machines where I want to upgrade the agents, and this is how it goes about. Automation is really helping us with this.

Based on my experience with Airlock Digital Application Control, I would share a piece of advice with organizations considering it. The first thing I would say for any organization wanting to implement application control whitelisting is to understand the business requirements first and whether this product will meet their needs. Secondly, they must follow a proper governance mode and thorough change management process because you cannot just update or roll out on the fly. If you are going to deploy this particular product in your environment, have the plans in place, take all teams into confidence, and then definitely things will work fine. I would give Airlock Digital Application Control a rating of eight out of ten based on my overall experience.

I primarily use Airlock Digital Application Control for application control.

The best features of Airlock Digital Application Control are that it is easy to use, deploy, and manage.

Airlock Digital Application Control absolutely helps prevent malware within our system, and that is tested as well. We use other systems to test it.

The policy change history feature helps us improve our auditability and governance over policies by allowing us to report to our auditors if they have any questions about how we use it and what we do with it. It also helps us keep track of what is going on in the environment on both desktop and server levels and cloud levels. It also gives us assurance that it is working as we expect.

Regarding areas that might have room for improvement, I honestly do not have anything. I have not really thought it through, but I cannot think of anything that really needs to be improved at this stage, not from my perspective. I would have to talk to my cybersecurity coordinator to confirm, but he has never complained to me about anything, and it has always worked very well. So at this stage, do not change too much. It is a good product that needs to keep track of technology, but you have to keep that in check.

As for the clarity and speed of the new user interface compared to the previous one, honestly, to me it is no different. I am not really finding it to be any different. It is good, but it is no different from what it was previously as far as efficiency is concerned. It seems fine.

I have been using Airlock Digital Application Control for approximately five years.

The stability of Airlock Digital Application Control has been excellent, and I rate it a 10. There has been no downtime, bugs, or glitches.

As for scalability, I rate it a nine.

Regarding the technical support from Airlock Digital Application Control, I do not know because I have never had to use them, but I am going to say nine because I just do not know. As far as I understand, we have never had any issues, and I think the issues we have had have been resolved quickly.

When comparing Airlock Digital Application Control with other solutions or vendors, I do not think there is any other peer on the market that I could find. At the time we went to Airlock Digital Application Control, the only solution available was the Microsoft version, and it is just not even comparable. The Microsoft application whitelisting product is rubbish. Therefore, Airlock Digital Application Control was a no-brainer for us.

The policy change history feature helps us improve our auditability and governance over policies by allowing us to report to our auditors if they have any questions about how we use it and what we do with it. It also helps us keep track of what is going on in the environment on both desktop and server levels and cloud levels. It also gives us assurance that it is working as we expect.

When it comes to the deployment of Airlock Digital Application Control, it is easy, and it took us a couple of months. I only have a single cybersecurity coordinator, and we were just working with it. The reason it took a couple of months is that we wanted to let it run in audit mode first, check that we got it right, and then we deployed it slowly over time to ensure we got it right. If you get it wrong, Airlock Digital Application Control being an application whitelisting product can really cause a lot of problems. So you have to get it right the first time, but we found it very easy to deploy in that regard. It makes it very easy to understand what you have got right and what you have got wrong, and then you can deploy easily. It took us a while, but I would not say it was excessive.

We are not using the bidirectional REST API.

Regarding the return on investment from Airlock Digital Application Control, I think certainly there has been ROI, but it is a bit of an intangible question only because of the nature of the product. The return on investment is that in five years, we have never had a breach or a malware event that has been a result of Airlock Digital Application Control, or at all, honestly. I think Airlock Digital Application Control is part of that solution, which means that we have had a significant return on investment. It is just unrealized because we have never had an infiltration because of it.

As for my thoughts on the pricing of Airlock Digital Application Control, I think for the quality of the product, it is fair. It is certainly a fair price for what it is; it is not excessive. I would think it is quite a reasonable price for the quality of the product. It is a good quality product that always works, and I do not think it is overpriced in any way.

Having used Airlock Digital Application Control for five years, I honestly do not directly use it every day, but it does seem that my team does not complain about it. They are very happy with it, and there has not really been much mentioned to me about the features and what has been enhanced. We have not had enhancements that have made a significant difference to us day-to-day. At this stage, it has been a very solid platform that has not changed too much over the years, honestly, and it has been very reliable. I think that is part of the reason we appreciate it; it does not change in excessive amounts. The changes are incremental and easy to track, so we are not too concerned about when it changes.

My impressions of the granular policy control offered by Airlock Digital Application Control are that it is very flexible and can be used in many different environments. That is one of the things we have loved about it; we can deploy it in different environments. We categorize our servers and set up policies based on different categories of servers, and that has worked out quite well.

My advice to others looking to implement Airlock Digital Application Control would be to read the documentation, work with the support team, and deploy it. I think it is a great product.

I rate Airlock Digital Application Control a nine overall, as it is a great product.

To make the solution a 10, we could consider more AI, a better interface, or pricing. It is hard to give a 10 out of 10 because I think there is always room for improvement. The interface is good, but it could be improved a little more, becoming a bit more intuitive. Overall, it is fine, but maybe to go from a nine to 10 out of 10 could be some slight tweaks on the user interface.

Airlock Digital Application Control is used for application control as part of meeting the New South Wales Essential Eight program. It assists in preventing malware, and in the time we have been using it, we have only had one detection where it picked up a malicious file, which demonstrates strong performance.

The connectivity with InTune is exciting because it automatically pre-approves applications from the InTune library, which means I do not have to update the system as frequently. The console is also excellent and very clear to understand.

Airlock Digital Application Control helps with our cybersecurity posture and maturity by allowing us to lock down a user environment with only approved applications. It stops other applications that are not approved from running, without requiring traditional administrator access to install or run them.

Airlock Digital Application Control has room for improvement in detecting and setting a standard environment when updates for programs are released. A better way to detect when we have approved programs but their updated versions also need approval would be helpful. As a very small cyber team, we continually look for efficiencies we can gain.

I have been working with Airlock Digital Application Control for three to four years.

I would rate Airlock Digital Application Control a 10 for stability. We have had no stability issues with it. Any stability issues we have experienced are the result of us blocking the wrong application, which is not the product's fault because it works as advertised.

I would say the scalability of Airlock Digital Application Control is a 10. Scaling from 150 to 180 to 220 users has not presented any issues.

I would rate the technical support from Airlock Digital Application Control a 10. There has not been anything we have asked that they have not been able to solve for us. The recent upgrade process was very easy.

Airlock Digital Application Control is pretty easy to deploy and work with. We do not perform manual deployment of it. It is baked into our mandatory InTune Standard Operating Environment, so deployment is just updating the client to newer versions occasionally.

I see about a 50 to 60 percent return on investment with Airlock Digital Application Control, not just financially but in terms of saving resources and time, especially when comparing it to other application whitelisting solutions that are much more involved.

The pricing of Airlock Digital Application Control is adequately set. We have budgeted for it, and it is one of our more significant line items, but we have the budget for it.

The single SKU licensing model of Airlock Digital Application Control has made budgeting and resource allocation easier because there are not as many components. We can have it as a single line item for however many licenses we have.

I compare Airlock Digital Application Control very highly to other vendors like ThreatLocker, Microsoft, Ivanti, and Carbon Black. We have recently looked at ThreatLocker and Microsoft in comparison to Airlock Digital Application Control. I have not looked at Carbon Black, and we are not looking at other options at the moment.

I hope to use the bidirectional REST API in Airlock Digital Application Control very soon to connect with a SOC SIEM solution to help with our reporting.

Regarding the integration capabilities of Airlock Digital Application Control, from the version we were running to the current version and the features we are looking at using, the integration options are fantastic and seem quite easy to implement where we need them.

Assessing the clarity and speed of the new interface of Airlock Digital Application Control compared to the previous version is challenging because I have mostly interacted with the previous interface and we have only recently upgraded. We might be among the last to upgrade, and I have not used the new interface extensively.

I do not use the policy change history in Airlock Digital Application Control because I believe that is a new feature we have not yet unlocked. We have just completed that upgrade, and we were quite behind on our updates.

I recommend Airlock Digital Application Control to other users because of the quality and the features we have discussed. It is a good product. The reason for my rating of Airlock Digital Application Control is really the updating of the database of applications we want to whitelist. It is more of a personal preference because as a small team, I do not have much time for this task. It is a larger task that we would like to make more efficient somehow without just approving everything. My overall rating for Airlock Digital Application Control is 8.

My main use case for Airlock Digital Application Control is to implement application whitelisting, prevent unauthorized software from running, and strengthen endpoint security against malware and ransomware.

A specific example of how I have used Airlock Digital Application Control in my environment is when this product blocked an unauthorized executable downloaded through email from running on an employee's workstation, preventing a potential malware infection while allowing approved business applications to continue operating normally.

The best features that Airlock Digital Application Control offers are application whitelisting, trusted application control, centralized policy management, audit mode, and detailed application visibility and reporting.

The centralized policy management feature allows us to create, deploy, and update application control policies from a single console, making it much easier to enforce consistent security across all endpoints, roll out changes quickly, and reduce the time spent managing individual devices.

One feature that stands out in Airlock Digital Application Control is audit mode, which lets you test application control policies before enforcing them, helping fine-tune rules, minimize false positives, and ensure a smoother deployment across the organization.

Airlock Digital Application Control has positively impacted my organization by improving endpoint security, reducing malware and ransomware risk, decreasing unauthorized software installation, and giving the IT team greater visibility and control over application execution across the organization.

The use of Airlock Digital's policy creation wizard impacts my daily management tasks by significantly reducing the time needed to create and deploy application control policies. It simplifies onboarding new applications, helps minimize configuration errors, and makes day-to-day policy management more efficient, especially across a large number of endpoints.

Airlock Digital Application Control is highly scalable, allowing organizations to expand protection across thousands of endpoints without major performance issues. It supports centralized policy management, easy onboarding of new devices, and consistent application control enforcement across diverse environments.

Airlock Digital Application Control could be improved with a better management interface, richer reporting and analytics, broader third-party integrations, and simpler policy creation for large or complex environments.

I have been using Airlock Digital Application Control for around eight months.

In my experience, Airlock Digital Application Control is very stable and reliable. It runs consistently across endpoints with minimal downtime, maintains dependable policy enforcement, and performs well even in larger environments with many users and applications.

Airlock Digital Application Control is highly scalable, allowing organizations to expand protection across thousands of endpoints without major performance issues. It supports centralized policy management, easy onboarding of new devices, and consistent application control enforcement across diverse environments.

Customer support for Airlock Digital Application Control is responsive and knowledgeable, providing timely assistance during deployment, troubleshooting, and policy configuration. The support team is helpful in resolving issues and providing guidance on best practices for application control management.

I previously used Microsoft AppLocker and traditional endpoint security controls before switching to Airlock Digital Application Control because it provided stronger application allowlisting capabilities, better centralized management, improved visibility, and easier policy enforcement across a large number of endpoints.

I evaluated other options, including Microsoft AppLocker, ThreatLocker, Ivanti Application Control, and CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager before selecting Airlock Digital Application Control due to its strong application allowlisting capabilities, ease of management, and focus on endpoint application control.

I evaluated other options, including Microsoft AppLocker, ThreatLocker, Ivanti Application Control, and CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager before selecting Airlock Digital Application Control due to its strong application allowlisting capabilities, ease of management, and focus on endpoint application control.

Since implementing Airlock Digital Application Control, we have seen around a 50 to 60% reduction in unauthorized application incidents, 30 to 40% less time spent investigating endpoint security events, and lower malware remediation costs, resulting in measurable operational savings and improved IT efficiency.

The deployment of Airlock Digital Application Control required minimal infrastructure investment, and the predictable licensing structure made it easier to plan budgets and scale application control coverage across endpoints.

I evaluated other options, including Microsoft AppLocker, ThreatLocker, Ivanti Application Control, and CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager before selecting Airlock Digital Application Control due to its strong application allowlisting capabilities, ease of management, and focus on endpoint application control.

My advice to others looking into using Airlock Digital Application Control is to start with a clear application control strategy, use audit mode before enforcing policies, involve application owners early, and gradually roll out controls across the environment. Proper planning and tuning help reduce false positives and ensure a smooth deployment. I would rate this product a 9 out of 10.

I use Airlock Digital Application Control for application control, primarily handling servers. The solution manages approximately 1,000 servers with centralized control.

Airlock Digital Application Control offers several best features. The application server itself is very light and operates at fast speeds. When whitelisting something, it applies immediately over the network. The solution handles multiple network subnets including layer four and layer 3.5, and all operate very fast.

Recently, improvements have been made to the whitelisting functionality in Airlock Digital Application Control. When any client finds files blocked, a pop-up appears, and they can request approval directly from there. The console displays incoming requests and shows whether they are whitelisted, approved, not approved, or denied.

If Airlock Digital Application Control implemented AI, it would be very beneficial. The solution is very easy to handle from our end, but AI implementation would make it even better.

If the solution can generate an email and send requests to the call center to create a work order or change request in the upcoming updates.

I have used Airlock Digital Application Control for the last year primarily for application Whitelisting

The stability of Airlock Digital Application Control receives a rating of 10.

Scalability with Airlock Digital Application Control also receives a rating of 10.

The technical support of Airlock Digital Application Control receives a rating of 10 because only a few cases were opened and they were handled perfectly. Support has not been required often, and it can be handled very well. The technical team was present during implementation and provided all necessary support and guidance.

Previously, another application was used for more than 10 years. Recently, that product was not undergoing any development, so this year the switch was made to Airlock Digital Application Control. A proof of concept was completed more than a year ago, and the solution was found to be very light, very fast, and much better than the previous one.

Airlock Digital Application Control was compared with other vendors including Trend Micro, Ivanti, CrowdStrike, and Sophos. Ivanti was used for the last 10 years and was based on Windows, making it heavy and not lightweight. Airlock Digital Application Control is Linux-based and very lightweight.

Installation of Airlock Digital Application Control takes less than one day. The application is deployed, tested on a few endpoints, and then deployed group by group to avoid creating problems across all machines simultaneously. This group-by-group approach was perfect with no complaints generated.

Airlock Digital Application Control has been deployed on-premises, and it was downloaded from the support portal. Installation is very easy.

Four admins have control of Airlock Digital Application Control. Approximately one thousand servers are used by many people in application administration roles across different divisions. Four application admins handle the solution, and one admin deployed it.

The infrastructure team handles the setup, while the licensing part is handled by another department.

Airlock Digital Application Control's policy change history feature is used with multiple policy groups. The latest version allows policy application on a host-based level, where even a single endpoint can have policy applied.

Airlock Digital Policy Creation Wizard is very helpful for determining which files the admins are using. The company policy prevents unauthorized installations because the information security team is very cautious about implementing new installations and EXE executions. These installations can be controlled through the portal.

Granular policy control of Airlock Digital Application Control provides strong satisfaction.

Airlock Digital Application Control can be highly recommended, and the overall rating is 10.

During my evaluation, Airlock Digital Application Control was deployed in an on-premise lab environment. It was not deployed in a public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud setup.

My main use case was to evaluate how application whitelisting could improve endpoint security. We wanted to ensure that only trusted and approved applications could run on Windows systems while blocking unauthorized software and unknown executables. This helped us understand how application control can reduce the attack surface, prevent malware execution, and strengthen overall endpoint security before deploying applications in a controlled environment.

The features that stood out the most were applications whitelisting, centralized policy management, trusted application approval workflows, detailed audit logs, and the ability to create flexible rules for different systems. I also appreciated how it provided clear visibility into which applications were allowed or blocked, making it easier to manage endpoint security while reducing the risk of unauthorized software running.

The feature I relied on the most was application whitelisting. It made the evaluation much easier because I could clearly define which applications were trusted and verify that everything else was blocked automatically. Combined with the audit logs, it was straightforward to see why an application was allowed or denied, which helped us validate our security policies and troubleshoot any issues quickly.

Overall, I found the feature easy to use once I became familiar with the interface. The policy management was well-organized, and the audit logs made troubleshooting straightforward. I also appreciated that it could fit into an existing endpoint security workflow without requiring major changes. Once the initial policies were configured, day-to-day management was quite smooth.

I had a positive impact by improving the overall security of our testing environment. We were able to prevent unauthorized applications from running, validate our application control policies, and gain better visibility into endpoint activity through the audit logs. It also reduced the time spent manually checking which applications were approved, making our testing more organized and efficient.

One area for improvement would be making the user interface more intuitive, especially for first-time administrators. The initial policy configuration can take some time, so additional setup wizards or policy templates would make deployment easier. I also believe more advanced reporting and dashboards would help administrators gain insights more quickly. Overall, the core functionality was strong, but improving usability would make the product even better.

One additional improvement would be broader integration with other security and SIEM platforms to simplify centralized monitoring and incident response. I would also like to see more built-in deployment guides and best-practice templates for different environments, which would make onboarding easier for new administrators.

I have been using Airlock Digital Application Control for around five months as part of a lab evaluation and hands-on security exercises.

During my lab evaluation, I found Airlock Digital Application Control to be stable and reliable. Policy changes were applied consistently, approved applications ran as expected, and unauthorized applications were blocked according to the configured rules. I did not experience any significant crashes or reliability issues during testing.

Based on my evaluation, I believe Airlock Digital Application Control is designed to scale well. Although I tested it in a lab environment rather than a large enterprise, the centralized policy management and application control approach suggest it would be capable of handling larger environments with many endpoints. I did not encounter any scalability issues during my testing, but I cannot comment from direct experience on very large production deployments.

I did not have any direct interaction with Airlock Digital's customer support because our evaluation did not require opening support cases. Most of what I needed was available through the product documentation and the interface itself. Based on that experience, I cannot fairly assess the quality of their support team, but I did not encounter any issues that required vendor assistance during my evaluation.

Before evaluating Airlock Digital Application Control, I was not using another dedicated application control solution. For comparison, I had experience with standard Windows security features and basic endpoint protection tools in a lab environment, but this was my first hands-on evaluation of a dedicated application whitelisting platform.

This was a lab evaluation. The setup process itself was straightforward, although the initial policy configuration required some planning to ensure only approved applications were allowed. Overall, I did not experience any major surprises or challenges related to licensing or deployment costs.

Since my experience was based on a lab evaluation, I do not have measurable ROI metrics such as cost savings or reduced staffing. However, I did notice that policy management became more efficient and validating approved applications required less manual effort. In a production environment, I believe the biggest return on investment would come from reducing malware-related incidents, lowering the time spent investigating unauthorized software, simplifying compliance audits through detailed logging, and improving administrator productivity through centralized policy management.

I was not directly involved in pricing, setup cost, or licensing decisions. From the technical side, I did not encounter any licensing-related issues during the evaluation.

I did not conduct a formal evaluation of other dedicated application control products before using Airlock Digital Application Control. My evaluation focused specifically on understanding Airlock Digital Application Control capabilities in a lab environment.

My advice would be to start by understanding your organization's application landscape before creating policies. Begin with a small pilot group, use audit mode to identify trusted applications, and gradually enforce application control to avoid disrupting users. I would rate this review as nine out of ten.

Application whitelisting has become increasingly important, and ensuring that we’re not running code unknown to our organization is crucial. The organizations I work for have been using it to effectively whitelist applications known to be in use, and then highlight any applications that aren’t within the remit of the service delivery organizations or the infrastructure organizations, ensuring that we’re only executing known code.

One of the use cases for Airlock Digital Application Control that we identified were timer applications; we found applications being used potentially to exfiltrate information. We found people using WhatsApp as well as Signal, which weren’t under the control of the data loss prevention capability within the organization I was working with, so we were able to identify applications that might be missed by DLP.

We have certain use cases where users require using scripting languages and programming languages such as Python to run simulations and modeling; this is not something we want every user to be able to do, but it’s allowed us to select which users are allowed to run certain applications and under what scripting languages and programming languages and under what circumstances they’re allowed to run them. This means that it’s not a blanket on or off; it’s about under what context the application can actually run, allowing users to use Python or PowerShell under constrained use cases as opposed to unrestricted access.

One of the other capabilities I haven’t mentioned is the ability to have an on-premises as well as a cloud instance; in the industries I work in, having the ability to run disconnected from the internet or running everything on-premises for data sovereignty purposes is really important. Airlock Digital Application Control has given us that flexibility to have both deployments depending on the context in which we’re running the application or needing this capability.

Anybody going on an application control journey is going to realize that they need a maturity uplift; this has allowed us to present information back to the service delivery organizations and the infrastructure organizations, and the application organizations within the companies I’m working with, and help them develop a maturity plan around uplifting their processes and their policies and their workflows. It’s also helping them have justification around limiting Shadow IT, and being able to say no—this application is not appropriate or this application is appropriate. It helps them on that maturity journey.

Airlock Digital Application Control is probably the easiest application control that I’ve come across; the product has a GUI-first, web interface-first approach to application control, and the way that it’s able to present exceptions or identify what those untrusted executions are is the best that I’ve seen in the field. It’s easy, it’s very quick, and I think that it reduces that barrier to entry for application control.

One of the best features that Airlock Digital Application Control offers is the ability to create complex rules around what applications are allowed to execute under what circumstances and where. It helps us answer the who, what, where, when, and why, to a lesser extent, applications are being used; it’s absolutely the ability to define complex rule sets.

I appreciate the automated baselines that are in Airlock Digital Application Control; being able to start off with a starting point of what, for example, Windows 10 or Windows 11 or one of the server platforms would normally run means we’re not developing our policies from scratch. I also appreciate the ability for bulk adding and identifying publishers of applications and being able to blanket approve publishers, for example, or I can put complex rules around publishers so that the publisher can only execute under certain circumstances. The flexibility and the way that the product has been designed has been really well thought out.

I love how granular Airlock Digital Application Control is; I think the metadata rules, which allow us to create complex rule sets, are excellent compared to what I’ve seen in other products doing application control. Airlock Digital Application Control is just so far ahead of others.

I think there are features that are coming down the pipeline that we don’t have yet; one of which is the ability to have a managed installer process. There is that capability currently, but it’s reliant on WDAC or Windows Application Control, as opposed to being natively within Airlock Digital Application Control. This is something that is coming, but we haven’t actually seen it deployed yet. At the moment, we’re still having to onboard applications individually, and that would be the biggest pain point that we have right now.

I think more guides on how to onboard and bring Airlock Digital Application Control into production would be helpful; these aren’t technical needs, more around documentation and potentially some videos on how to onboard or how to bring it into your organization more efficiently.

I have been using Airlock Digital Application Control now for about nine months.

Airlock Digital Application Control has been extremely stable for me so far; I haven’t had any problems with the agents when they’re deployed and the policies are stable. It has had some problems with the on-premises deployment, in terms of stability of the server-side components, and there have been some minor problems with upgrades of agents, but nothing insurmountable.

At this stage, the only scaling issues we’ve had with Airlock Digital Application Control have been around the reporting database; everything else has been fine.

We were using AppLocker in some use cases, which was really managed by a group policy; we found that it was too coarse, and we weren’t able to get granular policy control with it. That’s why we moved towards Airlock Digital Application Control, and with Airlock Digital Application Control, we are actually installing that on the entire workstation and server estates, whereas previously it was only on very specific application servers.

At nine months in with Airlock Digital Application Control, I think we’re still not seeing a return on investment, and that’s partially because the need for application control was more important or timely than the processes were able to keep up with. At this stage, we’re still heavily invested in resources bringing it up and aligning our processes with it, so I think we will have a return on investment, but I don’t think it’s going to be in year zero. I think it’s going to be probably towards the back end of year one.

I think the user experience is quite good for a modern product; the reporting is getting better with every release, and at this stage, I don’t have any specific points on the reporting that I would want to be better. Perhaps some UI performance improvements, but generally, I think that for what Airlock Digital Application Control does, it does extremely well and fits within that scope really well.

I advise others looking into using Airlock Digital Application Control to understand what your software asset register looks like and what is allowed to run in your organization; once you understand what is allowed to run, you can then develop policies and processes to implement Airlock Digital Application Control efficiently. If you don’t have those governance structures in place, you’re really going to struggle to move Airlock Digital Application Control from audit mode into enforcement mode.

I would rate this product a 9 out of 10.

My main use case for Airlock Digital Application Control is to provide protection to the application, and I am using it for in-house hosted applications.

I have internal software that is being used for filling up client data, and it was internally developed. Since my users are working from home or over the internet from remote locations, there are chances to be attacked by hackers over the internet. I am using this solution to identify the attack surface and to protect it from being attacked.

The best feature that Airlock Digital Application Control offers is the protection against DDoS attacks, which I appreciate most.

What stands out to me about the DDoS protection is that it addresses distributed denial-of-service attacks, so my legitimate application can be unavailable for actual users if a DDoS attack is happening on the application.

Airlock Digital Application Control has positively impacted my organization because I now have more visibility on my application security areas, which is giving my business confidence about the security and confidentiality. Based on this, my customers are able to easily use it, along with employees.

This increased visibility has helped my team and business by helping me understand the current gaps I have to work on to make my application more secure based on the reports and insights I am getting from the tool itself.

I think the team is doing well, and if the PS team or another team can help me with more granular technical training, that will be helpful for my team to learn the product and support the product without submitting a ticket with the tech team.

I have been using Airlock Digital Application Control for the last one year.

I did not previously use a different solution; this one is the first solution that I have implemented in my organization.

I have seen a return on investment because I am saving in terms of resources and fewer employees are needed. Earlier, manual tasks were more prevalent, and now because of AI and automation, things are quite easier for my organization.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is definitely good. Although it is a bit on the higher side for a small organization, for a medium or enterprise organization, it is a good choice, and the pricing is very effective.

Regarding Airlock Digital Application Control's AI capabilities, it is maintaining all kinds of logs of the traffic as well as the audit logs, which is helpful for maintaining governance.

For accuracy, I feel Airlock Digital Application Control is providing almost eighty-five percent accuracy, and the results are reliable. I am utilizing it for my daily routine work.

Airlock Digital Application Control is deployed in my organization on the public cloud.

I use AWS as the cloud provider.

I purchased Airlock Digital Application Control through the AWS Marketplace.

My impression of the granular policy control offered by Airlock Digital is that it is impressive, and there are many policies with granular control, giving me a more flexible environment for controlling traffic.

The use of Airlock Digital's policy creation wizard impacts my daily management tasks because it is helping in designing the policies and also giving me suggestions. Even an L1 person can easily configure it because the wizards are very useful and easy to configure.

I am using the policy change history feature in Airlock, and it is helping me because if a policy was created in the past and was working well, and somebody changed it for some reason, I can easily track it to understand if the new changes have created any kind of issues for the environment.

I assess the clarity and speed of the new user interface compared to the previous version as very good. It is very user-friendly, and I am very satisfied with the new user interface.

I am using Airlock Digital's bidirectional REST API, and it definitely helps with integration and automation in my IT processes because Airlock logs can be utilized with the SIEM tool. In a similar fashion, logs collected by other endpoint security technologies can be integrated with Airlock, so both tools can simultaneously synchronize and help me make the environment better.

In my experience, the single SKU licensing model is definitely good for my organization's budgeting and resource allocation for application control because if organizations are small or they want to start with Airlock, it is a great choice in that case.

Utilizing Airlock has helped prevent malware within my systems, and it definitely helps to prevent malware because it easily understands and detects traffic related to the applications. It helps me see if any kind of unintended traffic is there.

I would rate this product a ten out of ten.