I use JetBrains IDEs for building applications with Python as the backend. I use JetBrains IDEs as my IDE for really everything, including for database management. I connect through my database there, build out all the code for the backend, and use Angular, which works in JetBrains IDEs for my frontends and other different software SDKs that I attach in. That is primarily what I use JetBrains IDEs for.
My main use case for JetBrains IDEs is writing code. When I'm doing something that requires specific actions of an IDE, especially debugging and symbol management, I use JetBrains IDEs. For Python, I use PyCharm, and for PHP, I use PHPStorm. I use JetBrains IDEs for writing code and also sometimes for debugging.
Software Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 5
Dec 23, 2025
I use JetBrains IDEs and Visual Studio in tandem. Within JetBrains IDEs, I use IntelliJ. IntelliJ and Visual Studio are what I use primarily. Developing code and writing code is the key use case for IntelliJ. For me, the UI is what stands out. I do not know if it is not that appreciated, but the UI for IntelliJ works well for me. Because I have been using it for a very long time, I am comfortable using IntelliJ and have not switched to other solutions. I primarily write Java code, which is why IntelliJ works best for me. When I need to switch to something like Python for another purpose, that is when I use Visual Studio. I have not explored the new solutions that have come out from OpenAI yet. These two tools are what I am more comfortable with, which is why I continue to use them.
Our main use case is to program APIs in Microsoft Net Core >= 2.2. The development of APIs under JetBrains Rider allows us to use the Microsoft framework under Linux natively as if we were doing it from Windows. I never liked Visual Studio Enterprise in any of its versions. I started in Visual Studio Enterprise 2008 and I have seen how the tool has improved over the years. That said, the lack of usability and constant bugs made me dislike that tool version after version.
ICT Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Real User
Top 10
Nov 19, 2019
It enables us to develop a software that takes configuration Information for services, for servers, for Access Rights, and then generates all IBM MQSC scripts, all documentation (used within SharePoint), and provides a test framework to smoke test all services and queues on proper configuration.
JetBrains IDEs offer fast performance and efficient code development with features like robust code completion, integrated version control, and language-specific tools. Preferred by developers for functionality, these IDEs support a range of coding environments from Python and Java to Angular.JetBrains IDEs are designed to enhance productivity with an intuitive interface that includes extensive language support, seamless integration with platforms like AWS and Azure, and collaboration tools...
I use JetBrains IDEs for building applications with Python as the backend. I use JetBrains IDEs as my IDE for really everything, including for database management. I connect through my database there, build out all the code for the backend, and use Angular, which works in JetBrains IDEs for my frontends and other different software SDKs that I attach in. That is primarily what I use JetBrains IDEs for.
My main use case for JetBrains IDEs is writing code. When I'm doing something that requires specific actions of an IDE, especially debugging and symbol management, I use JetBrains IDEs. For Python, I use PyCharm, and for PHP, I use PHPStorm. I use JetBrains IDEs for writing code and also sometimes for debugging.
I use JetBrains IDEs and Visual Studio in tandem. Within JetBrains IDEs, I use IntelliJ. IntelliJ and Visual Studio are what I use primarily. Developing code and writing code is the key use case for IntelliJ. For me, the UI is what stands out. I do not know if it is not that appreciated, but the UI for IntelliJ works well for me. Because I have been using it for a very long time, I am comfortable using IntelliJ and have not switched to other solutions. I primarily write Java code, which is why IntelliJ works best for me. When I need to switch to something like Python for another purpose, that is when I use Visual Studio. I have not explored the new solutions that have come out from OpenAI yet. These two tools are what I am more comfortable with, which is why I continue to use them.
Our main use case is to program APIs in Microsoft Net Core >= 2.2. The development of APIs under JetBrains Rider allows us to use the Microsoft framework under Linux natively as if we were doing it from Windows. I never liked Visual Studio Enterprise in any of its versions. I started in Visual Studio Enterprise 2008 and I have seen how the tool has improved over the years. That said, the lack of usability and constant bugs made me dislike that tool version after version.
It enables us to develop a software that takes configuration Information for services, for servers, for Access Rights, and then generates all IBM MQSC scripts, all documentation (used within SharePoint), and provides a test framework to smoke test all services and queues on proper configuration.
I am using it for a Java Maven project for an important bank located in Argentina. It is integrated into the Git and connected to a Sybase database.