You need to be clear about your use cases and the transactional requirement you are observing from the database architecture before beginning with this solution. You need to consider your architecture based on the scalability and reliability of the applications. You need to take this into account before deploying any solution to Postgres. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.
We were using SQL Server in some circumstances, and the two solutions are very comparable, other than one being open source and one not. We've also used Cassandra, Bitquery, and a whole bunch of others. Each solution has unique advantages and disadvantages. From a feature standpoint, this solution is relatively close to parity in the environment. It stands out because it's opensource and cost effective, and it does everything pretty well. For those looking into implementing this solution, my advice would be to think about how you want to handle multi-regional replication. I would rate this solution as an eight out of ten.
According to the PeerSpot community, the key factors that make up a good Database Development and Management solution include speed and performance, ease of development, availability, and reliability, but security is the most influential decision-maker of all. More complex features that are also highly rated include query optimization and data handling, while monitoring and cost for value weighed in as well.
You need to be clear about your use cases and the transactional requirement you are observing from the database architecture before beginning with this solution. You need to consider your architecture based on the scalability and reliability of the applications. You need to take this into account before deploying any solution to Postgres. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.
We were using SQL Server in some circumstances, and the two solutions are very comparable, other than one being open source and one not. We've also used Cassandra, Bitquery, and a whole bunch of others. Each solution has unique advantages and disadvantages. From a feature standpoint, this solution is relatively close to parity in the environment. It stands out because it's opensource and cost effective, and it does everything pretty well. For those looking into implementing this solution, my advice would be to think about how you want to handle multi-regional replication. I would rate this solution as an eight out of ten.