It doesn't have any GUI-based monitoring tools. Oracle has some proprietary tools for monitoring all the databases and all that. Postgres doesn't have any graphical capabilities where we can monitor the database. We have to do it with the Sierra stuff and run some random commands. Then we can get the data from the cluster and databases table. The initial setup is complex. It would be ideal if they could provide an active cluster in Postgres. If one primary DB goes down, it should automatically fail over to the second database.
According to the PeerSpot community, the key factors that make up a good Database Development and Management solution include speed and performance, ease of development, availability, and reliability, but security is the most influential decision-maker of all. More complex features that are also highly rated include query optimization and data handling, while monitoring and cost for value weighed in as well.
It doesn't have any GUI-based monitoring tools. Oracle has some proprietary tools for monitoring all the databases and all that. Postgres doesn't have any graphical capabilities where we can monitor the database. We have to do it with the Sierra stuff and run some random commands. Then we can get the data from the cluster and databases table. The initial setup is complex. It would be ideal if they could provide an active cluster in Postgres. If one primary DB goes down, it should automatically fail over to the second database.
This solution struggled with multi-regional synchronization.