Gtm Operator, Lead Generator at 404Minds Technologies
Real User
Top 5
Mar 25, 2026
If you want to automate everything, Make is the only thing you can use to integrate and automate all the platforms, especially if you don't want to work manually.
I would advise others looking into using Make to consider it if they want to get a starting point of automation for something pretty simple. I would rate Make a nine out of ten.
I have not explored Make a lot, but it's decent. I chose eight out of ten because I haven't used any tool which is related to automation. This was my first experience with an automation tool, and it was helpful for me. Obviously, I don't have any other tool in my mind which can help me automate a few things. There is always room for improvement for things, so that's why I'm giving an eight, not a perfect ten. I'm not using Make very frequently as of now, but there was a time in the past few months when I was actually using it on a daily basis to automate some things. When I was using Make regularly, it was deployed just through the make.com website.
My rating for Make is 90 out of 100. I give it 90 because there is always scope for improvement, but I feel that this product is exceptional. I have not seen anything like Make so far. A perfect 10 would mean there is nothing more to improve. A nine probably means there is scope for improvement, changes to be made, and relevance to be established. Even with the world's best service, I question whether the world really recognizes it or if it can be utilized economically. Giving me a thousand credits per month can be consumed quickly, but none of those things accumulates, nor is there an unlimited version that can wait until I become profitable before offering me the first paid plan. I give commitments based on the number of credits being offered. Make is deployed in my organization on a public cloud. I use the make.com website itself. I signed up directly through the Make website. I would say to make your first use case and understand what the product is. Each entrepreneur or executive must understand what inventory they add by taking a subscription to Make. When you realize you have a machine that can save you time, it still needs to be understood that it can save you time based on the credits. If the credits get exhausted quickly, then you cannot save any further time. I am neither a partner nor a reseller. I am just a customer. I think it is a wonderful product, and if the aspect of giving time-based or quarterly credits instead of monthly credits comes into play, it could allow an entrepreneur or executive at any designation in an organization to make one or two full cycles over a quarter, which could be a significant achievement. I rate Make at 90 out of 100.
My advice for others looking into using Make is that it is a great tool for quickly automating workflows and integrating APIs. However, it is important to keep workflows organized as complexity grows. The most valuable feature is the time saving, especially in startups when you want to release the first version of your product quickly and want other parts to be smooth. Sometimes back end tasks take more time, sometimes front end, but if you have services such as Make, it can make the development time faster. You develop faster, check your features faster, and make integrations faster, so overall it helps to go to market quicker. I would rate this product an 8 out of 10.
Make is an interesting service that has helped to automate boring tasks such as sending welcome messages to people and automating repetitive tasks that do not generate value for the person doing them, thus saving their time. It has also been great for creating complex interactions between applications in order to automate completely internal processes from the company.My advice for others looking into using Make is that it is a great tool if you want to automate boring tasks such as sending welcome messages to people and automating repetitive tasks that do not generate value for the person doing them, thus saving their time and allowing them to focus on more strategic tasks. Additionally, it effectively automates the creation of complex interactions between applications in order to streamline completely internal processes, thus saving a lot of cost and time. I would rate my overall experience with Make an 8 out of 10, as it is a very recommendable tool.
I did not get included in the setup, but regarding the pricing, we use the 40 Euro package. I think it gives us 40,000 credits. I am not sure about the exact amount, but I know we get around 40,000 credits. As I said, that is not on the reasonable side of the spectrum. I would say first make sure Make supports your use case. Come up with your use case and use a free Make account to draft your workflow. If everything works properly, then proceed with buying it. Also be sure about the number of nodes that you use. Try to minimize the number of nodes because Make is charging per node, per action. If you feel that there is a more convenient option out there, such as n8n or Zapier, go with it. Make is very good and has a lot of integrations, but first make sure that is what you want. I would rate this product a 7 out of 10.
Make is very flexible, easy to use, and has a whole universe of modules readily available within its offering and portfolio. People should feel comfortable using it even if they are citizen developers or not hardcore developers. They should be able to use Make by watching one or two tutorials and by dragging and dropping things and connecting the different modules and adding conditions. I highly recommend Make with a rating of 8 out of 10.
I would rate Make an 8 out of 10 in terms of app integration and its ability to connect disparate systems seamlessly. The community around Make is really great, and I mostly work with that. I would rate Make as a product a 9 out of 10. I would say that others considering Make should go for it if they have some knowledge about it. If they have good ideas for automation, they should give Make a try. My experience has allowed me to create all the automations I was thinking about.
My advice to others is if you can get a system to be able to do whatever you need it to do, then use that system. Whatever fits your use case is what you should be using. I rate Make a six out of ten.
Make is a robust automation platform that streamlines workflows, connecting apps to enhance productivity. Tailored for tech-savvy users, it offers dynamic automation solutions that optimize processes and facilitate seamless integration of disparate systems. At its core, Make empowers businesses to automate tasks through an intuitive builder with drag-and-drop capabilities. Ideal for professionals who need to integrate systems efficiently, it supports a wide range of applications, aiding in...
If you want to automate everything, Make is the only thing you can use to integrate and automate all the platforms, especially if you don't want to work manually.
I would advise others looking into using Make to consider it if they want to get a starting point of automation for something pretty simple. I would rate Make a nine out of ten.
I have not explored Make a lot, but it's decent. I chose eight out of ten because I haven't used any tool which is related to automation. This was my first experience with an automation tool, and it was helpful for me. Obviously, I don't have any other tool in my mind which can help me automate a few things. There is always room for improvement for things, so that's why I'm giving an eight, not a perfect ten. I'm not using Make very frequently as of now, but there was a time in the past few months when I was actually using it on a daily basis to automate some things. When I was using Make regularly, it was deployed just through the make.com website.
My rating for Make is 90 out of 100. I give it 90 because there is always scope for improvement, but I feel that this product is exceptional. I have not seen anything like Make so far. A perfect 10 would mean there is nothing more to improve. A nine probably means there is scope for improvement, changes to be made, and relevance to be established. Even with the world's best service, I question whether the world really recognizes it or if it can be utilized economically. Giving me a thousand credits per month can be consumed quickly, but none of those things accumulates, nor is there an unlimited version that can wait until I become profitable before offering me the first paid plan. I give commitments based on the number of credits being offered. Make is deployed in my organization on a public cloud. I use the make.com website itself. I signed up directly through the Make website. I would say to make your first use case and understand what the product is. Each entrepreneur or executive must understand what inventory they add by taking a subscription to Make. When you realize you have a machine that can save you time, it still needs to be understood that it can save you time based on the credits. If the credits get exhausted quickly, then you cannot save any further time. I am neither a partner nor a reseller. I am just a customer. I think it is a wonderful product, and if the aspect of giving time-based or quarterly credits instead of monthly credits comes into play, it could allow an entrepreneur or executive at any designation in an organization to make one or two full cycles over a quarter, which could be a significant achievement. I rate Make at 90 out of 100.
I will definitely ask others to use Make more often because it helps a lot; it improves efficiency, and that is the biggest thing I found about Make.
The reason I rate Make a seven is primarily due to the high pricing and some issues with the code node.
My advice for others looking into using Make is that it is a great tool for quickly automating workflows and integrating APIs. However, it is important to keep workflows organized as complexity grows. The most valuable feature is the time saving, especially in startups when you want to release the first version of your product quickly and want other parts to be smooth. Sometimes back end tasks take more time, sometimes front end, but if you have services such as Make, it can make the development time faster. You develop faster, check your features faster, and make integrations faster, so overall it helps to go to market quicker. I would rate this product an 8 out of 10.
Make is an interesting service that has helped to automate boring tasks such as sending welcome messages to people and automating repetitive tasks that do not generate value for the person doing them, thus saving their time. It has also been great for creating complex interactions between applications in order to automate completely internal processes from the company.My advice for others looking into using Make is that it is a great tool if you want to automate boring tasks such as sending welcome messages to people and automating repetitive tasks that do not generate value for the person doing them, thus saving their time and allowing them to focus on more strategic tasks. Additionally, it effectively automates the creation of complex interactions between applications in order to streamline completely internal processes, thus saving a lot of cost and time. I would rate my overall experience with Make an 8 out of 10, as it is a very recommendable tool.
I did not get included in the setup, but regarding the pricing, we use the 40 Euro package. I think it gives us 40,000 credits. I am not sure about the exact amount, but I know we get around 40,000 credits. As I said, that is not on the reasonable side of the spectrum. I would say first make sure Make supports your use case. Come up with your use case and use a free Make account to draft your workflow. If everything works properly, then proceed with buying it. Also be sure about the number of nodes that you use. Try to minimize the number of nodes because Make is charging per node, per action. If you feel that there is a more convenient option out there, such as n8n or Zapier, go with it. Make is very good and has a lot of integrations, but first make sure that is what you want. I would rate this product a 7 out of 10.
Make is very flexible, easy to use, and has a whole universe of modules readily available within its offering and portfolio. People should feel comfortable using it even if they are citizen developers or not hardcore developers. They should be able to use Make by watching one or two tutorials and by dragging and dropping things and connecting the different modules and adding conditions. I highly recommend Make with a rating of 8 out of 10.
I would rate Make an 8 out of 10 in terms of app integration and its ability to connect disparate systems seamlessly. The community around Make is really great, and I mostly work with that. I would rate Make as a product a 9 out of 10. I would say that others considering Make should go for it if they have some knowledge about it. If they have good ideas for automation, they should give Make a try. My experience has allowed me to create all the automations I was thinking about.
Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
My advice to others is if you can get a system to be able to do whatever you need it to do, then use that system. Whatever fits your use case is what you should be using. I rate Make a six out of ten.