Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Veracode pros and cons

Vendor: Veracode

4.0 out of 5

202 reviews
89% willing to recommend

Pros & Cons summary

Veracode offers a platform for identifying software vulnerabilities through static and dynamic scanning, promoting early detection without exposing source code. Its cloud-based nature enhances scalability for distributed teams. Integration with CI/CD pipelines reduces manual intervention, although support for more languages and faster updates are needed. While praised for consulting services, improvement in false positive rates and tool integration is desired. The pricing may be prohibitive for small businesses. Pricing improvements are needed.

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

Veracode facilitates quick discovery and understanding of software vulnerabilities, allowing users to triage issues and prevent future occurrences.

The platform supports various users, including security champions and developers, emphasizing ease of use regardless of prior knowledge.

Strong technical support is highlighted, with rapid response times and specific guidance.

Integration capabilities with multiple tools, such as Jenkins and CI/CD pipelines, offer automation and efficient vulnerability management.

Static and dynamic scans, along with SCA, are valuable features that improve detection and remediation of security flaws.

CONS

Veracode struggles to handle several programming languages, lacking support for some modern and legacy languages.

There are issues with false positives, especially with JavaScript frameworks, causing additional work.

Dynamic scanning capabilities require improvement in terms of speed and accuracy.

Veracode's integration with existing CI/CD pipelines and other tools like SonarQube is weak, necessitating custom solutions.

High cost and lengthy scan times, particularly for large applications, are significant concerns.

Veracode Pros review quotes

SP

Software development program leader at Vendavo

Oct 14, 2021

The static scan is the feature that we use the most, as it gives us insight into our source code. We have it integrated with our continuous integration, continuous delivery system, so we can get insight quickly.

Read full review

reviewer1705929

Sr. VP Engineering at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

Oct 28, 2021

There is a single area on the dashboard where you can get a full view of all of the tests and the results from everything. There is a nice, very simple graphic that shows you the types of vulnerabilities that were found, their severity, the scoring, and in what part of the code they were found. All the details are together in one place.

Read full review

Information Security Architect at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees

Jul 31, 2023

The most valuable feature is the SAST capability and its integration into the Veracode pipelines.

Read full review

Free Report: Veracode Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about Veracode. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2025.

862,499 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Penetration Tester at NetFoundry

Sep 14, 2021

The solution's ability to help create secure software is very valuable. We're a zero-trust networking company so we want to have the ability to say that we're practicing security seriously. Having something like Veracode allows us to have confidence when we're speaking to people about our product that we can back up what we're doing with a certification, with a reputable platform, and say, "This is what we're using to scan an application. Here's the number of vulnerabilities that are on an application. And here's the risk that we're accepting."

Read full review

OK

Oleksandr Klymenko

Development Manager at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Oct 18, 2021

Considering that in my project, we are mostly using Software Composition Analysis as a part of Static Code Analysis, for me, the main part is reporting and highlighting necessary vulnerabilities. Veracode platform has a rather good database of different vulnerabilities in different libraries and different sources. So, finding vulnerabilities in third-party libraries is the main feature of Software Composition Analysis that we use. It is the most important feature for us.

Read full review

Product Manager at a hospitality company with 51-200 employees

Jun 21, 2023

The recommendations and frequent updates are the most valuable features of Veracode.

Read full review

MT

Marcello Teodori

Software Architect at Alfresco Software

Nov 4, 2020

The solution's ability to prevent vulnerable code from going into production is perfectly fine. It delivers, at least for the reports that we have been checking on Java and JavaScript. It has reported things that were helpful.

Read full review

AB

Principle Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Dec 20, 2020

Within SCA, there is an extremely valuable feature called vulnerable methods. It is able to determine within a vulnerable library which methods are vulnerable. That is very valuable, because in the vast majority of cases where a library is vulnerable, none of the vulnerable methods are actually used by the code. So, if we want to prioritize the way open source libraries are updated when a library is found vulnerable, then we want to prioritize the libraries which have vulnerable methods used within the code.

Read full review

Security Engineer at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Jan 9, 2023

In pipeline scanning, there is a configuration that can be set with respect to the security level of the flaw. If there is a high or a critical issue, there's a way the build can be failed and blocked before going into production.

Read full review

KM

Information Assurance Manager at xMatters

Nov 8, 2020

In terms of secure development, the SAST scan is very useful because we are able to identify security flaws in the code base itself, for the application.

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 195)

Veracode Cons review quotes

SP

Software development program leader at Vendavo

Oct 14, 2021

The ideal situation in terms of putting the results in front of the developers would be with Veracode integration into the developer environment (IDE). They do have a plugin, which we've used in the past, but we were not as positive about it.

Read full review

reviewer1705929

Sr. VP Engineering at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

Oct 28, 2021

I would ask Veracode to be a lot more engaged with the customer and set up live sessions where they force the customer to engage with Veracode's technical team. Veracode could show them a repo, how they should do things, this is what these results mean, here is a dashboard, here's the interpretation, here's where you find the results.

Read full review

Information Security Architect at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees

Jul 31, 2023

From what we have seen of Veracode's SCA offering, it is just average.

Read full review

Free Report: Veracode Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about Veracode. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2025.

862,499 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Penetration Tester at NetFoundry

Sep 14, 2021

The JIRA integration automation aspect of it could be improved significantly. We want to have a way to create tickets that are going to allow people to work through those flaws that we're finding. We don't want people to feel like they're missing out on something or that they're not following directions in the right way.

Read full review

OK

Oleksandr Klymenko

Development Manager at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Oct 18, 2021

The results of agent-based software composition analysis are not connected to policy scanning. So, for me, the only thing that Veracode can improve in Software Composition Analysis is to connect it with the policy scan because, at present, it is a bit inconvenient for those in our organization who use agent-based Software Composition Analysis. In the end, they need to make a static scan with all those libraries in order to receive that report. If Veracode implemented a connection between agent-based static scan and static scanning itself, it would be great because it would lead to fewer operations in order to prepare release documentation and release reporting from Veracode. We recently had a conversation with Veracode about it.

Read full review

Product Manager at a hospitality company with 51-200 employees

Jun 21, 2023

The false positive rates were quite high in our case.

Read full review

MT

Marcello Teodori

Software Architect at Alfresco Software

Nov 4, 2020

Veracode has plenty of data. The problem is the information on the dashboards of Veracode, as the user interface is not great. It's not immediately usable. Most of the time, the best way to use it is to just create issues and put them in JIRA... But if I were a startup, and only had products with a good user interface, I wouldn't use Veracode because the UI is very dated.

Read full review

AB

Principle Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Dec 20, 2020

Veracode has a few shortcomings in terms of how they handle certain components of the UI. For example, in the case of the false positive, it would be highly desirable if the false positive don't show up again on the UI, instead still showing up for any subsequent scan as a false positive. There is a little bit of cluttering that could be avoided.

Read full review

Security Engineer at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Jan 9, 2023

Veracode's SAST, DAST, and SCA are pretty good with respect to industry standards, but with regard to container security, they are in either beta or alpha testing. They need to get that particular feature up and running so that they take care of the container security part.

Read full review

KM

Information Assurance Manager at xMatters

Nov 8, 2020

The feature that allows me to read which mitigation answer was submitted, and to approve it, requires me to use do so in different screens. That makes it a little bit more complicated because I have to read and then I have to go back and make sure it falls under the same number ID number. That part is a little bit complicated from my perspective, because that's what I use the most.

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 192)

Related questions

140

What is the biggest difference between Veracode and Checkmarx?

89

Which gives you more for your money - SonarQube or Veracode?

47

Checkmarx or Veracode. Which should we choose?

7

Would you recommend Veracode? What are some of your use cases?

129

Checkmarx vs SonarQube; SonarQube interoperability with Checkmarx or Veracode

6

What do I scan when changing code in Veracode?

471

If you had to both encrypt and compress data during transmission, which would you do first and why?

22

When evaluating Application Security, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?

86

What are the Top 5 cybersecurity trends in 2022?

98

What are the threats associated with using ‘bogus’ cybersecurity tools?