Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Rancher Labs Logo

Top 10 Rancher Labs Alternatives

Vendor: Rancher Labs
4.2 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Rancher Labs Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Rancher Labs based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include VMware Tanzu Platform, Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform, and Splunk Observability Cloud. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Rancher Labs Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Rancher Labs, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Rancher Labs Logo
Rancher Labs Logo
VMware Tanzu Platform
4.0 out of 5
Rancher Labs offers ease of use and affordability, making it an ideal open-source solution for Kubernetes environments. In comparison, VMware Tanzu provides deep integration with extensive infrastructure components, catering to large enterprises requiring advanced functionality and comprehensive features for significant ROI.
Download Rancher Labs vs. VMware Tanzu Platform Report
Rancher Labs offers competitive setup costs with simpler initial integration, while VMware Tanzu Platform presents a higher setup cost reflecting its more complex integration features.
View comparison
Pricing
Rancher Labs offers competitive setup costs with simpler initial integration, while VMware Tanzu Platform presents a higher setup cost reflecting its more complex integration features.
Rancher Labs Logo
Rancher Labs Logo
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform
4.2 out of 5
Rancher Labs provides a cost-effective, open-source experience with easy deployment and community support, catering to agile businesses. In comparison, Red Hat OpenShift offers enterprise-grade features and robust security, ideal for organizations requiring extensive enterprise support and hybrid cloud capabilities.
Download Rancher Labs vs. Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform Report
Rancher Labs offers lower setup costs than Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform, highlighting a cost-effective option for organizations seeking container management solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Rancher Labs offers lower setup costs than Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform, highlighting a cost-effective option for organizations seeking container management solutions.
Rancher Labs Logo
Rancher Labs Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud offers powerful log processing and real-time monitoring, enhancing detailed reporting. In comparison, Rancher Labs excels in container management within Kubernetes, providing cost-effective deployment options. Rancher Labs' open-source model is appealing for flexible, scalable solutions.
Download Rancher Labs vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud boasts a straightforward setup cost structure, whereas Rancher Labs involves a more flexible pricing model that may suit varying deployments. Choose based on specific cost requirements and deployment flexibility needs.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud boasts a straightforward setup cost structure, whereas Rancher Labs involves a more flexible pricing model that may suit varying deployments. Choose based on specific cost requirements and deployment flexibility needs.
Rancher Labs Logo
Amazon EKS
4.3 out of 5
Rancher Labs Logo
Amazon EKS
4.3 out of 5
Rancher Labs provides versatile deployment and cost-effective solutions, emphasizing user-friendly integration with Kubernetes. In comparison, Amazon EKS offers strong multi-cloud operations and advanced AWS service integration, appealing for its robust orchestration and security features.
Download Amazon EKS vs. Rancher Labs Report
Rancher Labs provides a cost-effective setup, whereas Amazon EKS involves a more complex and higher initial expense, highlighting a key difference in setup costs between the two platforms.
View comparison
Pricing
Rancher Labs provides a cost-effective setup, whereas Amazon EKS involves a more complex and higher initial expense, highlighting a key difference in setup costs between the two platforms.
Rancher Labs Logo
Rancher Labs Logo
Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE
3.8 out of 5
Rancher Labs excels in storage and integration across resources due to its open-source nature. In comparison, Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) simplifies cluster creation and deployment. Rancher Labs offers flexibility across cloud environments, while NKE enhances efficiency within existing systems.
Download Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE vs. Rancher Labs Report
Rancher Labs offers a lower initial setup cost, making it an economical choice, while Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE features higher setup expenses but provides extensive enterprise-grade functionality.
View comparison
Pricing
Rancher Labs offers a lower initial setup cost, making it an economical choice, while Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE features higher setup expenses but provides extensive enterprise-grade functionality.
Rancher Labs Logo
Rancher Labs Logo
Portworx Enterprise
4.6 out of 5

Portworx is the solution for running stateful containers in production, designed with DevOps in mind. With Portworx, users can manage any database or stateful service on any infrastructure using any container scheduler, including Kubernetes, Mesosphere DC/OS, and Docker Swarm. Portworx solves the five most common problems DevOps teams encounter when running stateful services in production: persistence, high availability, data automation, security, and support for multiple data stores and infrastructure.

Download Portworx Enterprise vs. Rancher Labs Report
I'm not sure how the licensing was broken out, but I don't think our offering of the Portworx was more than USD $20,000.
The price of Portworx Enterprise is high.
View comparison
Pricing
I'm not sure how the licensing was broken out, but I don't think our offering of the Portworx was more than USD $20,000.
The price of Portworx Enterprise is high.
Rancher Labs Logo
Kubernetes
4.3 out of 5
Rancher Labs Logo
Kubernetes
4.3 out of 5
Rancher Labs provides strong Kubernetes integration with features like persistent storage and easy scaling, appealing to those with limited Kubernetes knowledge. In comparison, Kubernetes offers scalability and container orchestration, appealing to complex architectures requiring advanced functions.
Download Kubernetes vs. Rancher Labs Report
Rancher Labs offers competitive setup costs, while Kubernetes may involve higher initial investments. The cost difference can play a crucial role in decision-making for organizations evaluating budget constraints.
View comparison
Pricing
Rancher Labs offers competitive setup costs, while Kubernetes may involve higher initial investments. The cost difference can play a crucial role in decision-making for organizations evaluating budget constraints.
Rancher Labs Logo
Docker
4.3 out of 5
Rancher Labs Logo
Docker
4.3 out of 5
Rancher Labs appeals to tech buyers seeking open-source Kubernetes integration and easy multi-cloud deployments. In comparison, Docker's container portability and automation features attract those valuing simplicity. Each solution offers distinct advantages suitable for different infrastructure and deployment needs.
Download Docker vs. Rancher Labs Report
Rancher Labs offers a transparent setup cost, making it predictable for budgeting, while Docker may involve additional hidden setup expenses, creating potential surprises for users.
View comparison
Pricing
Rancher Labs offers a transparent setup cost, making it predictable for budgeting, while Docker may involve additional hidden setup expenses, creating potential surprises for users.
Rancher Labs Logo
Rancher Labs Logo
Google Kubernetes Engine
4.0 out of 5
Rancher Labs provides seamless integration and scalability with open-source flexibility, reducing vendor lock-in. In comparison, Google Kubernetes Engine offers comprehensive ecosystem integration and a managed environment, simplifying infrastructure management for users within Google's cloud, suitable for businesses seeking extensive cloud capabilities.
Download Google Kubernetes Engine vs. Rancher Labs Report
Rancher Labs offers an open-source solution minimizing setup costs, while Google Kubernetes Engine requires a paid plan with additional support services.
View comparison
Pricing
Rancher Labs offers an open-source solution minimizing setup costs, while Google Kubernetes Engine requires a paid plan with additional support services.
Rancher Labs Logo
Portainer
4.0 out of 5
Rancher Labs Logo
Portainer
4.0 out of 5
Portainer offers a streamlined approach for managing Docker containers, enhancing efficiencies with features like simplified deployment and user management. It is easy to use but could improve in documentation and network security options. Portainer suits various industries seeking to efficiently handle containerized applications.
View comparison
Rancher Labs Logo
Komodor
4.4 out of 5
Rancher Labs Logo
Komodor
4.4 out of 5
Rancher Labs simplifies multi-cluster management with affordable pricing, attracting diverse organizations. In comparison, Komodor focuses on deep troubleshooting and monitoring, offering operational insights that justify a higher cost, appealing to businesses prioritizing robust monitoring for complex issues.
Download Komodor vs. Rancher Labs Report
Rancher Labs offers a straightforward setup at a minimal cost, while Komodor requires a higher investment for initial setup; these distinctions are vital for budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
Rancher Labs offers a straightforward setup at a minimal cost, while Komodor requires a higher investment for initial setup; these distinctions are vital for budget-conscious users.
Rancher Labs Logo
HashiCorp Nomad
4.0 out of 5
Rancher Labs Logo
HashiCorp Nomad
4.0 out of 5
Rancher Labs offers cost-effective ease of use and Kubernetes management with excellent support, appealing to those prioritizing user experience and budget. In comparison, HashiCorp Nomad delivers functionality through innovative features and integrations, benefiting organizations focused on flexibility and workload scalability.
Download HashiCorp Nomad vs. Rancher Labs Report
Rancher Labs offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while HashiCorp Nomad may involve higher initial expenses due to its more complex configuration.
View comparison
Pricing
Rancher Labs offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while HashiCorp Nomad may involve higher initial expenses due to its more complex configuration.
Rancher Labs Logo
Rancher Labs Logo
Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP)
4.0 out of 5
Rancher Labs excels with multi-cluster management and easy setup, ideal for straightforward deployment. In comparison, NKP offers robust scalability and enterprise-grade security, benefiting businesses with complex infrastructures. Rancher Labs is cost-effective for smaller companies, while NKP delivers higher ROI through advanced features for larger enterprises.
Download Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP) vs. Rancher Labs Report
Rancher Labs offers a cost-effective setup, while Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP) presents higher initial costs reflecting its premium infrastructure offerings.
View comparison
Pricing
Rancher Labs offers a cost-effective setup, while Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP) presents higher initial costs reflecting its premium infrastructure offerings.
Rancher Labs Logo
Rancher Labs Logo
HPE Ezmeral Container Platform
3.5 out of 5

Accelerate your journey to hybrid cloud with the industry’s first enterprise-grade container software platform for cloud-native and distributed non-cloud native applications.

Download HPE Ezmeral Container Platform vs. Rancher Labs Report
View comparison
Rancher Labs Logo
Rancher Labs Logo
Mirantis Container Runtime
1 out of 5

Mirantis Container Runtime enables containers to run efficiently on any substrate, powering business critical applications at the world’s leading companies.

View comparison
Rancher Labs Logo
Diamanti
1 out of 5
Rancher Labs Logo
Diamanti
1 out of 5
Diamanti appliance is purpose-built for containerized applications that combines the ease of hyperconverged infrastructure with the unparalleled performance and efficiency of bare-metal containers. Diamanti addresses the unique requirements of containerized applications, ensuring network interoperability and persistent storage. Diamanti virtualizes network and storage for containers using a built-in PCIe converged I/O controller in every appliance to guarantee application performance without code changes or customization. The PCIe architecture delivers order-of-magnitude latency improvement compared with traditional shared-storage systems and software overlays.
View comparison

Related categories

Container Management
Data Storage for Kubernetes
Build Automation