Docker vs Rancher Labs comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Docker Logo
1,542 views|1,272 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Rancher Labs Logo
8,036 views|6,388 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Docker and Rancher Labs based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Container Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Docker vs. Rancher Labs Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The scalability of Docker is good.""We are able to stop our containers or stop the service with a single command.""Docker creates lightweight applications that are easy to manage and scale.""The most valuable feature of Docker is its portability, ease of security management, and low resource usage.""The most valuable feature of Docker is that it revolutionized virtualization by providing a new approach with containers that completely nullified the time it used to take to deploy applications on virtual servers, resulting in deployment times that can be as quick as milliseconds, unless it is a heavy application, such as Java. Additionally, resource utilization has greatly improved with Docker, allowing for more resources to be allocated to other tasks. These are a few key features that make Docker a preferred choice.""We find the auto scaling and auto healing functionality of this solution very good.""Docker is easy to understand and follow. It provides good scalability to the application.""Docker is very reliable. It's easy to scale, and it's very stable."

More Docker Pros →

"The solution has a lot of good features, such as you can access the console and edit through the GUI. The dashboard and the UI are designed well, user-friendly, and easy to manage, and access.""The tool's UI is very convenient enough to help you manage multiple clusters in the cloud or the company, making it a product with which you can manage different clusters and locations.""The solution is stable.""The most valuable feature of Rancher Labs is its user interface, which makes it easier to work with containers and deployment.""Rancher Labs is a very user-friendly tool.""The product is simple to use for a beginner.""The initial setup is simple and straightforward.""The most valuable feature is its comprehensive support, easy resource scaling, compatibility with various OEMs, and seamless service integration."

More Rancher Labs Pros →

Cons
"We are facing multiple issues with the solution's stability.""Owing to a few shortcomings in its stability, I would say that its stability can be improved.""Marketing of Docker is one area that needs to improve.""The volumes for persistent storage could be more user friendly right out of the box.""The solution is not easy to manage and it is one of the reasons why people introduce orchestration tools to manage it.""Docker can improve the integration with Microsoft Windows. It does not support native installations.""Docker could improve by having security vulnerability reports.""Unfortunately, base images are not currently available."

More Docker Cons →

"They should improve application visibility along with code visibility.""Could be more intuitive.""The solution could improve by adding more features in the dashboard, such as monitoring, scanning, and security. This would be a great benefit.""I can't migrate to the newer version.""If you have poor infrastructure, you will have issues with the tool.""We're looking for something that is even easier to use. It's a bit complicated.""We have found that the auto-secure feature of this solution doesn't always work, and could be improved to be more reliable, particularly when working with business critical applications.""We'd like their monitoring tool to be integrated by default."

More Rancher Labs Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Docker is a free open-source solution. However, there is the Docker Enterprise which is a paid solution."
  • "There is a license needed to use Docker."
  • "We are using the open-source version of the solution."
  • "Docker is a free open-source solution."
  • "The current cost for us is nothing as an open source."
  • "This is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing costs."
  • "Docker is cost-effective and open-source."
  • "For commercial use, it's about $30 per month. The license itself isn't expensive, but if there are many users, the price becomes high."
  • More Docker Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "There is an annual subscription. The price of the solution should be cheaper and have better pricing flexibility."
  • "The solution is free and open source but there is a fee for support."
  • "This is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing costs involved."
  • "Although Rancher Labs is an open-source solution, they also offer a paid version, where you buy the support when needed."
  • "The pricing of the solution sits in the mid range, not high and not low. It has a fixed price that you pay every month."
  • "There are no hidden charges attached to the product unless a user opts for the premium support offered by the solution."
  • More Rancher Labs Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Management solutions are best for your needs.
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We are using Docker to host applications.
    Top Answer:Since Docker is an open-source solution, it is free of cost.
    Top Answer:We are facing multiple issues with the solution's stability.
    Top Answer:The product is simple to use for a beginner.
    Top Answer:Pricing for Genesys and Rancher Labs is quite similar, and it varies depending on the specific case and the discounts negotiated from the list price. We have a term license based on a yearly… more »
    Top Answer:To implement deployments, you can initially start with yaml files instead of relying solely on the Linux command line interface. This approach could be more comfortable for users working with yaml… more »
    Ranking
    7th
    Views
    1,542
    Comparisons
    1,272
    Reviews
    40
    Average Words per Review
    394
    Rating
    8.6
    5th
    Views
    8,036
    Comparisons
    6,388
    Reviews
    9
    Average Words per Review
    443
    Rating
    8.6
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Docker takes away repetitive, mundane configuration tasks and is used throughout the development lifecycle for fast, easy and portable application development – desktop and cloud. Docker’s comprehensive end to end platform includes UIs, CLIs, APIs and security that are engineered to work together across the entire application delivery lifecycle.

    Rancher Labs build innovative, open source software that makes it easy to deploy and manage containers in production on any infrastructure. We enable organizations to accelerate all aspects of their software development pipeline, from writing and testing code to running complex microservices-based applications.

    Rancher, our flagship container management platform, allows users to easily manage all aspects of running containers in development and production environments, on any infrastructure. With well over four million downloads, Rancher has quickly become the tools of choice for teams serious about running containers in production. This includes large enterprises such as Sony, IBM, Tyco, Align Technologies and more.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Albert Heijn, Bell, BMC, Samsung, WindStream, Johnson & Johnson
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm26%
    Energy/Utilities Company13%
    Non Profit9%
    Educational Organization9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Insurance Company11%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Government8%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm43%
    Pharma/Biotech Company14%
    Comms Service Provider14%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Government9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise53%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise62%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business46%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise46%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise68%
    Buyer's Guide
    Docker vs. Rancher Labs
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Docker vs. Rancher Labs and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Docker is ranked 7th in Container Management with 40 reviews while Rancher Labs is ranked 5th in Container Management with 13 reviews. Docker is rated 8.6, while Rancher Labs is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Docker writes "Easy to deploy with an impressive networking feature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rancher Labs writes "An easy-to-use user interface, which makes it easy to work with Kubernetes and containers". Docker is most compared with Mirantis Container Runtime, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE, AWS Cloud Development Kit (CDK) and Codespaces, whereas Rancher Labs is most compared with VMware Tanzu Mission Control, OpenShift Container Platform, Amazon EKS, Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE and Google Kubernetes Engine. See our Docker vs. Rancher Labs report.

    See our list of best Container Management vendors.

    We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.