Our organization mainly deals with enterprise mobility and develops enterprise mobile applications for our customers, using Oracle Autonomous Mobile Cloud Enterprise.
Oracle Autonomous Mobile Cloud Enterprise delivers a comprehensive platform that enables enterprises to build, deploy, and manage mobile applications effortlessly, offering cutting-edge features designed for innovation and seamless integration.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Oracle Autonomous Mobile Cloud Enterprise | 6.3% |
| Temenos Quantum | 8.2% |
| IBM MobileFirst | 7.9% |
| Other | 77.6% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Mobile App Platforms | Jun 22, 2026 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Jun 22, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Oracle Autonomous Mobile Cloud Enterprise vs Android SDK | Jun 22, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Oracle Autonomous Mobile Cloud Enterprise vs SAP Mobile Platform | Jun 22, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Oracle Autonomous Mobile Cloud Enterprise vs Temenos Quantum | Jun 22, 2026 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temenos Quantum | 3.6 | 8.2% | 81% | 15 interviewsAdd to research |
| RingCentral Events | 0.0 | 2.3% | 0% | 0 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 2 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 33 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 18 |
| Large Enterprise | 20 |
Oracle Autonomous Mobile Cloud Enterprise is tailored for enterprises that require robust mobile application solutions, offering capabilities that streamline development processes. It supports both native and hybrid apps, backed by intelligent services, fostering agile transformation and business continuity. The cloud-native environment ensures resources are efficiently managed, enabling teams to focus on crafting user-focused mobile experiences.
What are the key features of Oracle Autonomous Mobile Cloud Enterprise?In financial services, Oracle Autonomous Mobile Cloud Enterprise assists in developing secure mobile banking apps, while healthcare can leverage its capabilities for patient engagement through personalized applications. Retailers deploy it to enhance shopping experiences with custom in-store applications, ensuring a seamless journey across digital platforms.
Oracle Autonomous Mobile Cloud Enterprise was previously known as AMCe, Oracle Mobile Cloud Service, Oracle Mobile Cloud Enterprise, Oracle Mobile Application Framework.
CACI, City of Las Vegas, Avantic, Lloyd's Register, Colab Consulting, PITSS, TXI, Shikun Binui, ECSTeam, Inc., Matrix
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Software Engineer - Development at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees | 4.0 | Oracle Autonomous Mobile Cloud Enterprise helps us quickly deliver mobile applications using its built-in APIs, connectors, and SSO. We also develop chatbots. However, I find its documentation, especially for new features, needs better integration steps. |
| Solution Architect at a tech services company with 201-500 employees | 4.5 | I found Oracle MCS excellent for mobile backend development, simplifying custom API creation and abstracting complexities like push notifications. It's stable, but I'd appreciate Swagger support for APIs and additional security mechanisms like client certificates. |
| Senior Software Developer at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees | 3.5 | I find Task Flows and web service linking valuable, offering good structure. However, older smartphones struggle with deployment and performance, and it's hard to learn without ADF knowledge. Scalability is not an issue. |
| Senior Developer at a tech services company | 3.5 | I found Oracle MAF's hybrid framework and drag/drop useful for quick mobile solutions, but performance and app size need improvement. Its cost isn't ideal for small businesses, making it better for large enterprises integrated with other Oracle products. |
| Lead Mobile Developer at a tech company with 501-1,000 employees | 3.0 | I found MAF good for multi-platform deployment and scalability, with straightforward setup. However, it's confusing for newcomers, lacks literature, and has stability issues with crashes and visual bugs. Customer support is decent. |
| VP IT at a recreational facilities/services company with 51-200 employees | 4.0 | I find it a dependable, scalable, and stable partner, crucial for website availability. Technical support is good. However, I often wait too long for essential patches, which is a significant area for improvement. |
| Application Developer at a university with 10,001+ employees | 4.5 | I find Oracle MAF simplifies development with one codebase for Android/iOS and has helpful customer service. Setup is easy, but I wish for better performance, more functionality, and mobile app analytics. Despite this, I recommend it. |
| Senior Technology Consultant at Oracle India Pvt. Ltd | 4.0 | I find Oracle MAF easy to use, especially with Java, offering good data visualization and reducing development teams. While app performance and size could improve, Oracle's support is excellent. I recommend it for mobile app development. |
| Vice President Certus Cloud Solutions at Certus Solutions | 4.5 | Oracle's PaaS for SaaS helps me powerfully extend cloud apps for unique needs, leveraging great scalability. While quick to onboard, it needs more integration points for diverse landscapes. Given its rapid evolution, I'd always consult experts. |
| Co-Founder & CEO at TALIUM | 4.0 | We chose Oracle MAF for its cross-platform capabilities, powerful mobile persistence, and Taskflows, which significantly improved our ERP mobile extensions, providing huge value, advanced offline support, and speeding up development for iOS and Android users. |
Our organization mainly deals with enterprise mobility and develops enterprise mobile applications for our customers, using Oracle Autonomous Mobile Cloud Enterprise.
Oracle Autonomous Mobile Cloud Enterprise helps us to deliver the application much more quickly, as it comes with built-in platform APIs for storage, push notifications, analytics, etc. Our customers can also get the details about API performance and reports on custom events, in a graphical format.
Valuable features include:
Now they have rolled out Oracle Autonomous Mobile Cloud Enterprise which also helps us to develop chatbots. We have implemented Facebook Channel enabled Chatbots using AMCe that allows to interact with Oracle EBS modules like HRMS. Here user can interact with chatbots to get the details about approved leaves, available leaves & also have the provision to apply leave.
For one of our major clients, we wrote custom APIs in Oracle Autonomous Mobile Cloud to convert SOAP APIs to REST APIs. We were also able to integrate SSO functionality in their mobile application using Virtual Zero Footprint SSO. Oracle Autonomous Mobile Cloud has a built in token exchange endpoint that allows to generate SSO tokens using third party JWT
or SAML tokens. We have also implemented Browser Based SSO in some of our client mobile applications.
One of the key areas in which MCS needs improvement is documentation. New features, like Zero Footprint SSO, need better documentation with detailed integration steps.
When positioning Oracle MCS, our main focus is to implement non-existing Single-Purpose APIs needed by new Mobile apps and to apply basic security mechanisms (Authentication and Authorisation) to the exposed Mobile backends. In addition, we use MCS to depict more advanced Mobile Use cases like the implementation of location-aware services or the management of push notifications.
Oracle MCS enables us to focus on most important part, when doing Mobile Backend development: implementing the needed business logic, which brings value to our customers. Technical details, like the interaction with Push Notification Services from Apple or Google are abstracted through MCS; we as developers just need to declare and configure things, but the "magic" is handled by the platform.
Oracle MCS is more than just a Mobile Backend as a Service (MBaaS) solution. It is a complete eco-system for implementing mobile applications, covering typical standard features, like Notification Management, Offline Data Synchronization or Location-based Services.
In addition, MCS provides capabilities for creating Mobile applications using Oracle Mobile Application Framework (MAF). In addition, you can use Oracle Mobile Accelerator (MAX), which is a no-code development platform to create, test, and publish sophisticated cross-platform mobile apps.
Through connectors, MCS can easily be connected to backend services (REST, SOAP, ICS). These connectors make the usage of backend services in Custom APIs much easier since in the connector configuration, things like security can simply be declared without the need for writing any code for such things in your custom APIs.
Custom APIs in MCS are Node.js implementations where things like data transformations and contract tailorings, e.g., only return 10 out of 100 attributes of a business object, can be done to create new mobile-optimized Single-purpose APIs a.k.a., Backend For Frontends.
For speeding up the development of native (iOS, Android, Windows) or hybrid mobile apps (Cordova-based apps, JavaScript apps), MCS provides corresponding SDKs. This makes apps development easier and more efficient.
From my point of view, it would be desirable if Swagger would also be supported as a valid description format for custom APIs. Currently, there's only support for RAML.
In addition, it would be good to include further security mechanisms, e.g., allowing authentication via client certificates, which is currently not supported.
Custom API can be based on RAML documents (v0.8) and it is also possible to export the RAML document of an implemented Custom API. This makes custom API creation as well as Mobile app implementation more efficient since there is a common API description available.
With respect to other Cloud Services, like Oracle API Platform Cloud Service, it would be desirable if Custom APIs in MCS can also be based on the Swagger, respectively, Open API documentation format, to be more consistent regarding the overall Oracle Cloud platform, and to be more interoperable between different Platform as a Service (PaaS) offerings.
A second thing that I wanted to mention is that it would be nice to include more features, in the area of security, with respect to authentication and authorization.
Currently, Mobile Backends can be secured by leveraging HTTP Basic Authentication and OAuth2. I’d be happy to see support for a further mechanism, like allowing authentication via client certificates, which would also allow to uniquely identify the device sending specific requests.
Currently, you’d need to fully establish a Mobile Device Management solution to achieve this, which is not required in every case. Adding more features in the security area would give users more flexibility.
We did not encounter any issues with stability.
We did not encounter any issues with scalability.
Technical support is good and there's also lots of material available. There are many blogs, YouTube channels, and documentation available.
We did not use a different solution before.
There's nearly no setup since it is a Platform as a Service offering. The creation of the cloud instance and the provisioning of the MCS service are the only things to do. It is a really straightforward procedure.
Since I work for a consulting company, we implement solutions based on Oracle MCS for our customers to depict their use cases.
An eye should be kept on the number of planned interactions, where an interaction is a call to an exposed API or Push Notification sent to a Mobile device. The number of interactions might be a significant cost driver. A good application, as well as API Design, is very important.
We did not evaluate other options.
MCS should be used for the corresponding use cases and for implementing Single Purpose APIs, a.k.a., Backend For Frontend to be used with Mobile apps. The platform should not be seen as an API Management solution. For implementing a consistent API Management approach, Oracle API Platform Cloud Service should be used.
There are two primary features:
The Task Flow feature provides us with structure and navigation between AMX pages, both bounded and unbounded.
They need to enhance it to allow older smartphones to work smoothly without hanging.
We have had deployment issues with older smartphones. Otherwise, we have not had deployment issues.
There was some slowness on old devices, and it is hard to learn if you do not know ADF technology.
We have had no issues scaling it.
The hybrid framework and drag/drop features are the most valuable. With these features, it can eliminate some specific skills for specific platforms. For UI components, it's amazing enough to make it user-friendly.
With the drag/drop, task flow, easy installation and others features, Oracle MAF can help the organization to make the mobile solution easy and quick.
Performance and size of the applications produced can be improved.
I only joined the development of Oracle MAF around a month ago, but I have researched mobile application frameworks for around three months.
There were no issues with the scalability.
I cannot rate technical support; but when finding a problem and searching in the community, the response was not great.
The initial setup is easy. Oracle provides documentation and a tutorial that also can be found on Youtube.
It would be better to make the pricing and licensing more suitable (cheaper) for small businesses.
We chose two solutions to for creating mobile applications, Oracle MAF and React Native. Due to the issue in performance, Oracle MAF was used as a second solution with React Native as the main one.
This product is not recommended for a small business. Oracle MAF is suitable for a large company that has an integrated system with other Oracle products. Please take into consideration the performance, price, and size of the application of this product. You need to check if it fits with your business needs.
Enabled easier transition into multiple mobile platforms.
There is a lot of room for improvement. MAF has enabled ADF developers to work with mobile devices, but the way the framework works might be confusing to a newcomer. There is not a lot of third party literature on the framework.
I've been using it for 12 months.
We had no issues deploying it.
There are some stability issues with the framework, some bugs can cause the mobile application to crash, and there are other visual bugs as well.
We have had no issues scaling it for our needs.
I would rate them 7/10. You can get a lot of help from the official forum.
I used iOS Cocoa Framework. I chose to move to MAF because I work with Oracle in general, and MAF looked like a great framework to work with.
It's pretty straightforward. We just needed to ensure we had JAVA SDK and JDeveloper installed, then we could download MAF.
We developed it in-house.
The product is not yet available on the market so I do not know how much it is going to cost.
Some screenshots of a mobile app I worked on...
The high availability features are important, like it's a pretty dependable and reliable partner.
We feel like, as an internet company, we try to achieve 99.99% availability of our website for all users. Since we get fewer bounces in the system, it does provide reliability and availability for the website.
A few times, what we encountered is that when we need some things to be patched, or some security bugs, they are not available on time. We need to wait a lot for the patches to be available. So if the patch cycle can be quickened, that would be very helpful.
It's pretty stable.
It's pretty scalable.
I was happy with technical support most of the time.
At a previous company, we considered switching to Linux and all; and for a few of the things. We switched to Linux.
I would say that it's pretty rock solid from the foundation. It's dependable for using in products and systems.
Oracle MAF allows deployment of a mobile app to both Android and iOS. It's one code base for both platforms.
It actually simplifies the development. For both platforms, we use one programming language, which is Java. It is easier for a developer to develop an app from scratch; it's pretty easy.
One of the features that would interest me would be mobile app analytics, which would allow us to track mobile app usage.
I think they need to invest more into the functionality of this framework. That's one reason for my rating. Another reason is the performance. Unfortunately, it's still not the best.
It's pretty stable. The problem is performance. Initial releases of Oracle MAF were really slow. They're getting better; they're working on the performance.
I don't think scalability actually applies.
We didn’t really have any previous solution. We just started with this one.
The initial setup is pretty straightforward; easy to install. Oracle MAF is just an extension for JDeveloper, so it’s pretty easy.
Actually, there are multiple approaches and possible solutions. One of them would be a web app, which would require us to have a separate server.
Oracle MAF was really straightforward. It allowed us to build a native app. We didn't have to add additional hardware. It was an easy choice.
When I’m choosing a vendor such as Oracle, the most important criteria for me is the name and the support.
Go for it.
With existing Java developers and minimum learning curve we are able to build Mobile Native applications. This avoided recruiting a separate team for mobile app development and training them. As we can deploy apps developed using MAF to multiple platforms, we avoided having a separate team maintaining separate code bases for each platform.
Deployment and run time performances can be improved. Takes lot of time to support new versions of the OSes and platforms.
I have been using this product (Formerly known as "ADF Mobile") from the day it was launched. That is for almost four years.
App performance is inconsistent sometimes.
Size of the MAF app is very large and it would be nice if they could reduce it.
Oracle provides the best in class customer service and support.
I have tried native mobile app SDKs for different OSs, but there is a big learning curve to start development with them, and an app built for one platform can't be ported easily to other platforms. We chose MAF because it has out of the box support for data visualization components, and offers an easy and declarative way to perform development.
The setup is easy to do. The only problem I faced was identifying the path of JDK v8 and providing it to JDev the first time after installing the MAF extension in JDev.
The implementation was done using an in-house team.
MAF is currently free with Oracle Mobile Cloud Service.
I advise people to explore and implement apps using Oracle MAF. I also encourage people to try out Oracle Mobile Cloud Service (MCS) which is the best value add products for enterprises trying to build mobile apps.
The short name for the solutions is called PaaS for SaaS. It's one of those names that roles off the tongue, but is not as east to type. Really what it is about is giving people access to the development tools on a cloud platform, so that they can actually extend their applications and have that extension hosted in the cloud the same way that the applications that they've started with are.
What's happened over the past few years is that people have really bought into the idea of moving to the cloud. One of those benefits of moving to the cloud is that you can't change it, therefore everybody is on the same release, the same version. It's easier to maintain. It's cheaper, all of those things.
Actually, what people want to do is to put things that are relevant to their organization, the things that are different for them, into those applications. There is this, "thou can't change it," but actually we want to. What has happened now is that Oracle have made their development tools, the same tools that they've used, available for you in the cloud. You can build your extension and then integrate the two. Which means that, you haven't changed the application, but you have been able to extend the functionality.
One of the things that we're working on at the moment is we're building an application to maintain an organization's need for immunization. We've got customers who need it for their staff today, we've got customers who are charities, who might need it in an emergency. We've identified immunization as something that people need. That's quite interesting, because you can have it in the system just as a requirement, so in the same way you might say, "oh this person needs a bachelor's degree in science". You can say, they need immunization against swine flu or something. But, actually you need to be able to manage a program. How do you do that? How do you get a whole team immunized? How do you deal with the period of time that they are valid for, etc.? We're building using the PaaS component, an extension application for immunization. It's allowing people to do some of their front office needs in their back office applications. It's a very powerful way of moving forward.
Oracle thought a lot about the integration with their products with their wider portfolio of products, their own premise applications. That's fine, where people are using a very straightforward integration but more and more you see people that have got a landscape that no one had considered, or it's their first time with Oracle and the rest of that portfolio is very, very different.
There is lots of different things that people want to integrate with and some of that needs to be improved. There needs to be more integration points, more APIs. The obvious ones are all there and they are all catered for, but for almost every customer, you find something new. One of the great things about cloud is these come along very quickly once they've been identified.
The original review was written in May 2015, and some of the functionality of the integration has improved, for instance there are no several APIs into HCM which make it much easier.
That's one of those great things about cloud, and I don't want to sound like a cloud salesman, but scalability isn't an issue. You're paying for what you use, and therefore if you want to use more, you just pay more for it. There isn't an issue about, "I've got to start off knowing where I'm going to get to". I can try something out, I can scale that out, I can build on it, I can continue to build. It's like having the most ginormous plots of land possible, and then being able to extend my building as much as I need to.
On the PaaS for SaaS side, where I would need help from Oracle occasionally is what are the components that I need. Actually that's more from a pre-sales point of view rather than from a post-purchase support stance, but that's very easy to get. It's very easy to go to Oracle and say, "I'm thinking of doing this, which are the components that are I need, and how can I work with that?" On the actual support side, we do use that a lot for the application, but when you're building the extension yourself, then you're less likely to be using technical support.
The way that we work is we try not to look at the gaps at the very beginning. A customer says, this is what we need, this is our back office and we've chosen Oracle to do that. We try not to get over excited at the beginning about how we could possibly take that forward later. Let's move them to cloud, let's get them to get those advantages straightaway. Then very quickly you start saying, well what things are still slowing you down? What are the manual processes that are happening in your organization?
You know the word "manual" is the big trigger. They say well, we're still doing this on a spreadsheet, and we're still doing this. I just send emails out to these list of people, where I say, okay, that's an area where I want to take it and automate it, and that's where I want to extend my application.
Onboarding is quite an interesting point, and I'll talk more about the applications themselves rather than building, because the building is just using the components. The actual basic onboarding is very straightforward. I can buy an application today or sign the paperwork today, and in less than ten days, I'll have my instances up and running.
What's slightly slow at the moment is if I ask for additional services. I might want to have my organization behind my own VPN, and the onboarding of the VPN service, because that's an additional service, that takes a bit longer. The same with if I want to use single sign-on with my own existing infrastructure, then again that takes a bit longer. There are additional services that Oracle offers, so that I can have the right integration and the right deployment for my organization. They take a bit longer, but the basic onboarding is very, very quick and straightforward.
One of the things that happens about cloud is it changes so quickly. If I've had to give in this answer just six months ago, Oracle had four components in their PaaS portfolio, and today, they've got thirty-two. By the time someone watches this video, the number could be whatever. It's very difficult to talk about what's the best part of it, because it's changing all of the time. I'd say the one that excites me the most at the moment are the integration cloud and the mobile cloud. Allowing people to connect to their enterprise and then make that mobile for people, because that's what people need more and more in their enterprises.
My recommendation is always talk to someone who is doing it or who understands it. The PaaS portfolio is changing all the time, so you're not going to be able to find someone who has done exactly what you want to do already. What you need is someone who understands that roadmap, understands the technology that's being offered to you. Then sit down and get them to understand your use case, and then work with them on how, what is the possibilities, what can be done with it.
The MAF mobile extensions we have built for an ERP in the construction industry have brought huge added-value to users in the field. MAF was especially advantageous to enable both iOS and Android support, facilitate authentication/integration issues, simplify having an advanced offline support, and speed up all corporate-class developments, be them initial or improvements.
2 years
We did it in-house.
As of today, there are basically two options for owning MAF licenses. Either as a free license accompanying Oracle Mobile Cloud Service (MCS) licenses, or as an unlimited-usage license for a single MAF application. U.
We chose MAF for several reasons -
MAF is easy to learn