Top 10 OpenText LoadRunner Cloud Alternatives

4.1 out of 5

43 reviews
92% willing to recommend

2,151 followers

Top OpenText LoadRunner Cloud Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to OpenText LoadRunner Cloud based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, and BlazeMeter. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud surpasses its competitors by offering scalable, cloud-based performance testing, intuitive user interfaces, seamless integration with DevOps tools, and the capability to simulate millions of users, ensuring exceptional application performance under varying load conditions.

OpenText Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with OpenText, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Apache JMeter

3.9 out of 5

Apache JMeter

3.9 out of 5

Apache JMeter offers open-source flexibility and cost-effectiveness for small-scale performance testing. In comparison, OpenText LoadRunner Cloud provides advanced features like SLA configuration and real-time anomaly detection for large-scale scenarios but involves higher costs.

Download Apache JMeter vs. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud Report

Pricing

Apache JMeter offers a free setup with community support, ideal for budget-conscious users, while OpenText LoadRunner Cloud incurs higher initial costs but delivers premium customer support and extensive cloud capabilities.

View comparison

Pricing

Tricentis NeoLoad

4.1 out of 5

Tricentis NeoLoad

4.1 out of 5

Tricentis NeoLoad offers swift script creation and affordable pricing appealing to those seeking cost-effectiveness and mobile testing capabilities. In comparison, OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, with its extensive protocol support and scalability, suits enterprises needing comprehensive performance testing and robust cloud efficiency.

Download OpenText LoadRunner Cloud vs. Tricentis NeoLoad Report

Pricing

Tricentis NeoLoad offers competitive setup cost efficiency, while OpenText LoadRunner Cloud presents a different pricing structure that can result in varying initial expenses. NeoLoad emphasizes affordability, whereas LoadRunner Cloud offers a scalable pricing model.

View comparison

Pricing

BlazeMeter

4.1 out of 5

BlazeMeter

4.1 out of 5

BlazeMeter offers seamless tool integration and flexible pricing, appealing to startups with adaptive strategies. In comparison, OpenText LoadRunner Cloud excels in protocol support and scalability, attracting buyers needing sophisticated testing environments and comprehensive feature capabilities in a robust cloud-based platform.

Download BlazeMeter vs. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud Report

Pricing

BlazeMeter offers a straightforward setup process, incurring minimal costs, while OpenText LoadRunner Cloud requires a more complex setup, often leading to higher initial expenses. This key difference highlights BlazeMeter's ease of use compared to LoadRunner's detailed configuration.

View comparison

Pricing

Oracle Application Testing Suite

3.9 out of 5

Oracle Application Testing Suite

3.9 out of 5

Oracle Application Testing Suite is valued for its seamless integration with Oracle products and strong automation. In comparison, OpenText LoadRunner Cloud excels in supporting diverse protocols and real-time anomaly detection. Tech buyers choose based on specific needs such as integration or scalability.

Download OpenText LoadRunner Cloud vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite Report

Pricing

Oracle Application Testing Suite has a higher initial setup cost, whereas OpenText LoadRunner Cloud offers a more affordable installation process.

View comparison

Pricing

Oracle Application Testing Suite has a higher initial setup cost, whereas OpenText LoadRunner Cloud offers a more affordable installation process.

RadView WebLOAD

4.1 out of 5

RadView WebLOAD

4.1 out of 5

RadView WebLOAD is lauded for its cost-effectiveness and intuitive ease, making it ideal for small to medium enterprises. In comparison, OpenText LoadRunner Cloud offers superior scalability and advanced features, appealing to large enterprises needing a comprehensive load testing solution.

Download OpenText LoadRunner Cloud vs. RadView WebLOAD Report

Pricing

RadView WebLOAD offers a straightforward setup cost appealing for smaller projects, while OpenText LoadRunner Cloud provides a scalable option suitable for larger enterprises. Choose based on project size and scalability requirements.

View comparison

Pricing

SmartBear LoadNinja

3.7 out of 5

SmartBear LoadNinja

3.7 out of 5

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud offers expansive testing environments and advanced analytics for complex scenarios. In comparison, SmartBear LoadNinja provides real-browser testing with seamless CI/CD integration. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud suits enterprises, while LoadNinja appeals to agile teams seeking rapid deployment and quick ROI.

Download OpenText LoadRunner Cloud vs. SmartBear LoadNinja Report

Pricing

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud typically involves higher setup costs compared to SmartBear LoadNinja, which is often viewed as more budget-friendly and easier to implement.

View comparison

Pricing

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud typically involves higher setup costs compared to SmartBear LoadNinja, which is often viewed as more budget-friendly and easier to implement.

Related categories

Performance Testing Tools

Load Testing Tools

API Testing Tools