No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
NGINX Ingress Controller Logo

NGINX Ingress Controller Reviews

Vendor: F5
4.3 out of 5

What is NGINX Ingress Controller?

Featured NGINX Ingress Controller reviews

NGINX Ingress Controller mindshare

As of May 2026, the mindshare of NGINX Ingress Controller in the Container Management category stands at 1.7%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Container Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
NGINX Ingress Controller1.7%
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform15.7%
Amazon EKS12.1%
Other70.5%
Container Management

PeerResearch reports based on NGINX Ingress Controller reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryContainer ManagementMay 25, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMay 25, 2026Download
ComparisonNGINX Ingress Controller vs Amazon EKSMay 25, 2026Download
ComparisonNGINX Ingress Controller vs Red Hat OpenShift Container PlatformMay 25, 2026Download
ComparisonNGINX Ingress Controller vs KubernetesMay 25, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Red Hat OpenShift4.24.6%95%73 interviewsAdd to research
VMware Tanzu Platform4.08.2%100%23 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated May 24, 2026

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise7
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business25
Midsize Enterprise16
Large Enterprise45
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Outsourcing Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Venture Capital & Private Equity Firm
7%
Educational Organization
6%
Healthcare Company
5%
Insurance Company
5%
Wholesaler/Distributor
3%
Media Company
3%
University
3%
Marketing Services Firm
2%
Retailer
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Government
2%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Energy/Utilities Company
1%
Construction Company
1%

Compare NGINX Ingress Controller with alternative products

Learn more about NGINX Ingress Controller

Related questions

 
NGINX Ingress Controller Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Senior Database Engineer, SRE at Interswitch Group3.5I use NGINX Ingress Controller for Kubernetes database services, valuing Transport Server and dynamic configuration. It's stable but not a connection pooler; a dedicated pooler is essential. Better database-aware health checks are needed. It improved routing change efficiency and reliability.
Senior Network At Dxc Technology Professional at DXC Technology4.5I've utilized NGINX Ingress Controller for SSL/TLS termination, reverse proxy, and IP whitelisting, finding it offers solid performance despite high costs and declining F5 support quality. Setup was generally straightforward, though coding aspects were a personal challenge. I rate the functional product highly.
Network Security Engineer at IIPL4.0I found NGINX Ingress Controller reliable and scalable for Kubernetes, excelling in routing and SSL termination with great F5 support. Though it needs WAF/dashboard and prices rose, its performance and ROI are strong. I rate it 8/10.
Consultor Independiente, Ingeniero De Bots, Ingeniero Cloud, Ai Engineer at Andela4.5I find NGINX Ingress Controller excellent for securing Kubernetes infrastructure in consulting. Its mature integration, flexible routing, and Layer 8 security provide significant ROI. Despite configuration challenges with annotations and rate limits, it's stable, scalable, and highly effective.
Senior Dev Ops Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees4.0I found NGINX Ingress Controller great for routing, SSL, and canary deployments, valuing its scalability and documentation. However, managing annotations for many services was messy and complex, especially for our large cluster, making us consider alternatives.
Technical Lead: Cloud Engineering at Fiftytwo Digital Limited4.5I use NGINX Ingress Controller for scalable load balancing and as an API Gateway. It's stable, lightweight, and performs well, offering good ROI despite documentation challenges and some paid features. I rate it 9/10.
Import Comliance Specialist at silicon214.5I find NGINX Ingress Controller excellent for performance, stability, security, and scalability, especially for enterprise microservices. However, its management GUI and ease of use for non-developers need significant improvement. I rate it 9/10.
Devops Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees4.5I use NGINX Ingress Controller in EKS for secure private endpoint traffic, handling routing and reliable SSL termination. Its excellent stability and scalability manage high traffic well, though documentation could improve. I highly recommend this solution for new Kubernetes clusters.