NetApp AFF Logo

NetApp AFF pros and cons

Vendor: NetApp
4.5 out of 5
Badge Leader
4,836 followers
Post review
 

NetApp AFF Pros review quotes

SG
Oct 29, 2019
The most valuable feature of this solution is its simplicity. It is easy to use.
it_user527175 - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 18, 2019
Things that have been really useful, of course, are the clustering features and being able to stay online during failovers and code upgrades; and just being able to seamlessly do all sorts of movement of data without having to disrupt end-users' ability to get to those files. And we can take advantage of new shelves, new hardware, upgrade in place. It's kind of magic when it comes to doing those sorts of things.
MA
Oct 21, 2019
Tech support has been absolutely amazing. I think on the technical aspects as well, my staff is able to get great support from the NetApp technical support resources that we have. What I love about NetApp is they have a health care division. At times, it's such an amazing thing because if we have a healthcare-related issue, there's no one better than having prior CIOs from health care organizations that NetApp has hired, and that are part of the health care team, to help out with any of those initiatives and support problems. Support has been absolutely phenomenal.
Learn what your peers think about NetApp AFF. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
GM
Nov 12, 2023
Our architecture has historically relied on RDMs, so AFF has enabled us to easily migrate from our old EMC PowerMax to the new NetApp. It's been pretty smooth. We have a lot of SAP servers in our environment, so performance is critical for us.
DR
Oct 5, 2021
It impacts customer retention because of its overall ease. When you are running a business, where time is a factor, that is the biggest selling point. Things happen really rapidly, when they happen, and being able to say, "Yeah, we can get this up and running in a day, if you want," or even less time in some cases. Sometimes, that can be what makes or breaks our case.
it_user750615 - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 8, 2017
The ability to do SnapMirror or SnapVault for data resiliency and backup.
JC
Nov 5, 2019
The most valuable features of the solution are speed, performance, and reliability.
RC
Nov 5, 2019
The most valuable features of this solution are snapshotting and cloning.
DB
Nov 5, 2019
The solution’s thin provisioning has allowed us to add new applications without having to purchase additional storage. We use thin provisioning for everything. We use the deduplication compression functionality for all of our NetApps. If we weren't using thin provisioning, we'd probably have two to times more storage on our floor right now than we do today.
FK
Nov 18, 2019
AFF has opened our eyes in a different light of how storage value works. In the past, we looked at it more as just a container where we could just dump our customer dBms and let the customers use it in terms of efficiency. Today, to be able to replicate that data to a different location, use that data to recover your environment or be able to have the flexibility with the solution and data. These are things which piqued our interest. It's something that we're willing to provide as a solution to our customers.
 

NetApp AFF Cons review quotes

SG
Oct 29, 2019
I want an interface through ONTAP that look more like what it does for the E-Series with Santricity.
it_user527175 - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 18, 2019
One of the areas that the product can improve is definitely in the user interface. We don't use it for SAN, but we've looked at using it for SAN and the SAN workflows are really problematic for my admins, and they just don't like doing SAN provisioning on that app. That really needs to change if we're going to adopt it and actually consider it to be a strong competitor versus some of the other options out there.
MA
Oct 21, 2019
The total cost of ownership has increased a little.
Learn what your peers think about NetApp AFF. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
GM
Nov 12, 2023
The ONTAP APIs are good, but little things here and there are slightly different, so I had to program something to catch a different error case or something like that. That adds a little work on my end, but it's ultimately been pretty easy to work with. It's just the consistency of the REST API. About, 95 percent of the operations working with the REST API are great, but then you have about 5 percent of things that are slightly different.
DR
Oct 5, 2021
I don't like the newest GUI. It needs more options. Some features have been removed. Oversight is not as good in the new GUI compared to the previous version. Though, it might be something that we just need to get used to.
it_user750615 - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 8, 2017
Additional performance, additional data efficiencies, that's what everybody wants right now.
JC
Nov 5, 2019
Tech support is a place where there is room to improve the product experience. The response time when they are busy is not very good.
RC
Nov 5, 2019
The cost of this solution should be reduced.
DB
Nov 5, 2019
Something I've talked to NetApp about in the past is going more to a node-based architecture, like the hyper-converged solutions that we are doing nowadays. Because the days of having to buy massive quantities of storage all at one time, have changed to being able to grow in smaller increments from a budgetary standpoint. This change would be great for our business. This is what my leadership would like to see in a lot of things that they purchase now. I would like to see that architecture continue to evolve in that clustered environment.
FK
Nov 18, 2019
Customer service is one area of the product line where I would love to see improvement. I have had several vendor experiences with NetApp where I faced challenges in the initial call trying to navigate the requirements of the service level expectation. Their response could be better improved. However, the final result is great. It is just the initial support level where improvement would help to effectively solve problems.