OpenText Business Processing Testing offers modularity in test design, separating test development from automation. Users value its reusability, ease of integration, and simplicity in designing tests. Both technical and non-technical teams, including business analysts, effectively collaborate using pre-designed components. The scalability, maintainability, and cross-technology support, alongside boosting productivity, are highly appreciated aspects.
- "This solution is very helpful to me. I use it to execute my use cases without a manual interface."
- "The solution is quite stable with SAP. It's nice. I use it extensively."
OpenText Business Processing Testing requires speed improvements for test execution since it remains a concern. Quality Center integration contributes to prolonged script access and modification time. Implementing offline editing options and local script copies would be beneficial. Users desire less reliance on the ALM tool and more repository flexibility. Improved stability was noted in version 12.01. Moreover, integrating in-tool guidance akin to Selenium's could aid newcomers. Slow script run speed is observed often due to the client/server approach.
- "There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be very easier to understand it if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool."
- "The solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with the ALM tool that they have. It should have its own base rather than the repository."
