TetraScience vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator comparison

TetraScience and WSO2 are both solutions in the Data Integration category. TetraScience is ranked #49 with an average rating of 6.5, while WSO2 is ranked #32 with an average rating of 8.0. Additionally, 50% of TetraScience users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 76% of WSO2 users who would recommend it.

TetraScience

Read 2 TetraScience reviews

285 Views
0 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Read 20 WSO2 Enterprise Integrator reviews

1,766 Views
742 Comparison Views

76% willing to recommend

TetraScience

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between TetraScience and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed TetraScience vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator Report (Updated: October 2025).

Buyer's Guide

TetraScience vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

October 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

TetraScience

Ranking in Data Integration

49th

Average Rating

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Ranking in Data Integration

32nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (7th)

Featured Reviews

Varun Khandavalli

Senior Specialist Engineering Dev. & Integration at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Efficient data integration and good automation with challenging configurability

The application has a difficult-to-use parsing capability, which requires a lot of reengineering when the use case isn't specifically met. The application also lacks capabilities within its terminal commands that are not available in their GUI. It requires a lot of configurability, which could be streamlined for an enterprise application user.

Read full review

Ritesh_Shah

Senior Solution Architect at Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Decreases the development timeframe and costs

The main issue with the product is pricing. It uses core-based pricing for WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and API Manager. It would be best if you had APIM by default. It provides many connectors for easy integration with third-party systems. Often, customers decide to develop using open-source tools like Spring Boot if there aren't many connectors required to avoid increasing costs. They'll develop this way and then deploy using APIM, the bare minimum needed. It is mainly required for very complicated setups with many connectors. In the implementations I've seen, people often used open-source tools because there weren't many third-party systems involved—just their organization's own systems. From WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, I expect them to bring up more and more connectors in the future. That's the main expectation. Having more connectors in various areas will help us when discussing new requirements. I don't have any specific use case right now, so I can't name a particular connector. But, as new technologies emerge, the relevant connectors should be there for those. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator mainly helps with the integration part, which can be simplified only if you have relevant connectors for whatever you're doing.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The crawler agents they provide, as well as TetraScience exclusive parsers, allow for specific instruments that we use in our labs with proprietary formats to extract data and put it into more standard formats for various purposes."

"The ingestion engines were pretty good."

"The installation process is easy."

"It's a consolidated product. It works and it does its job pretty well."

"It was mostly easy to set up the product."

"The drag-and-drop features for connectors are very valuable."

"WSO2's analytics capability is good, considering the ELC support they provide."

"It's a very complete product. It allows us to network security and add more layers of security to the system."

"Currently, I find the configuration part quite valuable, where you can easily configure things."

"The stability is excellent."

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator pros

Cons

"While functional during ingestion workflows, the automation toolkit required manual processes."

"The application has a difficult-to-use parsing capability, which requires a lot of reengineering when the use case isn't specifically met."

"They should release upgrades more frequently."

"The server is very specific and it is very difficult to get experience with it."

"The customization can be a bit difficult."

"WSO2 libraries are not mature enough. For example, if you want to integrate with Kafka using its Kafka library, it often has many bugs."

"One of the reasons that we are looking for a replacement is their way of defining integration. The language of the XML structures that I use to describe the integrations are not that standard, and it's not easy to find people who are familiar with this approach."

"There are a lot of security settings that when you apply you have to re-apply again every time you modify a setting. It is something that really needs to be enhanced."

"The integration capabilities need to be improved."

"The setup can be difficult for those not familiar with the solution."

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The pricing of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator for enterprise subscriptions can be considered expensive, especially from the perspective of someone who prefers open-source software."

"The cost is better than IBM Cloud Pak."

"I rate the product price a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."

"The solution costs about 20,000 or 30,000 euros per year, per instance."

"It is a low-cost solution."

"The open-source, unsupported version is available free of charge."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with TetraScience?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for TetraScience?

TetraScience is a platform that integrates instruments into a laboratory environment into other software applications that can help leverage the data. In most pharma companies, the application is u...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering TetraScience?

I would approach with caution. The platform has a high knowledge gap and the proprietary nature of its parsers and crawling agents. Before approaching TetraScience, have your use case in hand and u...

See all answers

What do you like most about WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?

WSO2's analytics capability is good, considering the ELC support they provide.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?

The product has reasonable and competitive pricing for enterprise customers. It is expensive for small businesses especially. They are using the open-source solution, and they find it expensive sin...

See all answers

What needs improvement with WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?

Something that could be improved in WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is that the problem is not a lack of capability or functionalities. The problem is that it is a very complex environment. To put your ...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Oracle Service Bus vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 14% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 11% of the time

Spring Cloud Data Flow vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 8% of the time

webMethods.io vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 8% of the time

Red Hat Fuse vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 7% of the time

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

September 2025

Download TetraScience product report

Buyer's Guide

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

September 2025

Download WSO2 Enterprise Integrator product report

Overview

TetraScience liberates, unifies, and transforms your raw data into more-than-FAIR, AI-native data.
We bring this AI-native data to life in a rapidly growing suite of next-generation lab data management solutions, scientific use cases, and AI-based scientific outcomes.
Only the Tetra Scientific Data and AI Cloud can liberate your data, engineer it for your most demanding scientific use cases and AI initiatives, and future-proof it so you’re never locked into vendor walled gardens again.

TetraScience

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, core to the WSO2 Integration Agile Platform, is an open source Integration product for cloud native and container-native projects. It enables enterprise integration experts to build, scale, and secure sophisticated integration solutions to achieve digital agility. Unlike other integration products, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator already contains integration runtimes, message brokering, business process modeling, analytics and visual tooling capabilities.

WSO2

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

West

Buyer's Guide

TetraScience vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

October 2025

Free Report: TetraScience vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Find out what your peers are saying about TetraScience vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and other solutions. Updated: October 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our TetraScience vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.