"The feature that I have found most valuable is the dashboard."
"From a testing perspective, the management is awesome. I am able to do testing and then add the reporting and the evidence. It is fair in terms of the price that you're paying. You get what you're paying for."
"If anyone is looking for a good, lightweight, flexible and agile test management product, I think they would do very well with Zephyr Enterprise."
"It has many features, but the main things that we need are the test cycles and integration with automation because we have automation for the web and mobile applications. We use it for test case management to run the test cases and get the results. At this moment, it is fulfilling our requirements. We are able to get the test execution report and the test pass and fail report. This summary is delivered to our management."
"I do see room for lots of improvement in it. In terms of usability, duplication with test cases and constant creation of projects isn't easy. There is also too much API integration into automation tools, which is not there in ALM with UFT. Instead of setting it up as a project and using it, we set it up as a system for usability. It also lacks in the traceability aspect. For traceability, you need to use the JIRA plugin and drag traceability on JIRA, but the functionality is still quite limited. The biggest gap is mainframe testing. It would be good if I could start with mainframe testing. Manual granting of access is another issue. There is no API that I could use with another system where it is automated. There is an API for loading somebody to a project but not for adding to the application."
"With TestRail, the APIs are there, but they may not be able to easily integrate with the Jenkins."
"We have a lot of automation for our products, and we require a utility for its integration with automation. Currently, we have to write this utility ourselves. It would be great if they can provide such a utility."
"Creating better default varieties of reporting would make the product much better and more popular."
TestRail by Gurock is ranked 11th in Test Management Tools with 2 reviews while Zephyr Enterprise is ranked 6th in Test Management Tools with 2 reviews. TestRail by Gurock is rated 5.6, while Zephyr Enterprise is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of TestRail by Gurock writes "Increases overall testing productivity, but not an automation-driven solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zephyr Enterprise writes "Useful for test case management and automation integration, but it should have a utility for automation integration". TestRail by Gurock is most compared with TFS, Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, Hiptest, PractiTest and Tricentis qTest, whereas Zephyr Enterprise is most compared with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, Adaptavist Test Management for Jira, TFS, Tricentis qTest and Tricentis Tosca. See our TestRail by Gurock vs. Zephyr Enterprise report.
See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
