Talend Data Integration vs webMethods.io comparison

Talend and IBM are both solutions in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category. Talend is ranked #13 with an average rating of 9.0, while IBM is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.1. Talend holds a 1.6% mindshare in PaaS, compared to IBM’s 8.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Talend users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Talend Data Integration

Read 5 Talend Data Integration reviews

1,059 Views
265 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

webMethods.io

Read 93 webMethods.io reviews

9,897 Views
1,781 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Talend Data Integration

webMethods.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 6, 2025

Talend Data Integration and webMethods.io are products in the data integration space, competing through their distinct attributes. webMethods.io has an edge with its comprehensive features, though Talend stands out for its pricing and customer service.

Features: Talend Data Integration provides robust ETL capabilities, a wide array of data source connectors, and a powerful environment for data transformation. webMethods.io stands out with extensive integration automation, seamless connectivity across systems, and advanced API management. webMethods.io's superior automation and management tools may justify its higher cost for enterprises seeking advanced integrations.

Room for Improvement: Talend could improve its scalability features, advanced integration options, and the user interface for better usability. webMethods.io might benefit from simplifying its complex initial setup process, reducing resource consumption, and providing more flexible pricing tiers.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Talend offers a straightforward deployment model and accessible customer support, ensuring quick setup and problem resolution. webMethods.io provides a cloud-based deployment with flexible scaling and integrations, but its initial setup is considered more complex. Talend’s strength lies in ease of setup and a support model that facilitates the onboarding process.

Pricing and ROI: Talend Data Integration is cost-effective, offering substantial ROI for data transformation needs. webMethods.io, with a higher upfront cost, potentially delivers greater ROI for organizations needing advanced integration features and automation. The main difference is Talend's budget-friendly pricing, while webMethods.io emphasizes delivering high ROI through extensive capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Talend Data Integration vs. webMethods.io Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Talend Data Integration vs. webMethods.io

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 864,155 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Talend Data Integration

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

18th

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

13th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

webMethods.io

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

7th

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (3rd), Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (3rd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (9th), API Management (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the mindshare of Talend Data Integration is 1.6%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of webMethods.io is 8.3%, down from 9.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

Featured Reviews

AntonioFonseca

Superintendente de TI (CIO) at a insurance company with 201-500 employees

Easy-to-use product with the ability to generate code efficiently

Talend's most valuable feature is its ability to generate code and packages efficiently. This feature streamlines the integration process, saving developers time and effort. Additionally, the stability of the generated code is noteworthy, as it ensures reliability over time. Despite not always producing the most aesthetically pleasing code, it eliminates critical errors, reducing the burden on developers. This stability is particularly crucial in complex integration scenarios, where errors can have significant consequences.

Read full review

MohanPrasad

Senior Consultant at Brillio

Smooth integration and enhanced deployment with high licensing cost

webMethods.io was used to integrate APIs through the webMethods.io platform, trigger database events, and connect backend APIs through a Java backend. It was used extensively for integration purposes in my organization Integration became smoother, troubleshooting was easier, and deployment and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Talend Data integration has a wide library of connectors."

"Talend's most valuable feature is its ability to generate code and packages efficiently."

"We have multiple use cases for this solution. We integrate with Salesforce, SAP and Oracle databases to build business logic and provide reporting."

"I'm very passionate about this solution because if you look at any other tool that costs around $200 - $300,000, like Delphix which costs you a million dollars, Talend is very cheap and is almost is at par with what others can do. There is one thing which Delphix does which Talend cannot do, but overall, I would say apart from that, if you're looking for a solution, you should give it a try."

"The product's integration with PostgreSQL and Jira has been helpful for us. Its performance is good. However, we do not use it for large data sets."

"The product is powerful, straightforward, and easy to use."

"What I like best about webMethods Integration Server is its portfolio of connectors."

"It integrates well with various servers."

"Given that you have one integration API in place, it takes very minimal effort to scale it to any other application that might want to use the same. Its flow-based development environment is a breeze and makes it really easy to re-use most of the existing components and build up a new API."

"Oracle's self-service capabilities, of which we make extensive use, is the most valuable feature."

"The MFT component of webMethods, for example, is easy to set up and convenient to use. It handles files very efficiently and it is easy to automate tasks with complex schedules. Monitoring is centralized to MWS which can be used to monitor other products as well (Trading Networks, BPM, MFT, etc.)"

"The core product can be used not only for automatic file transfers between applications, but also as an Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)."

"The solution is scalable."

More webMethods.io pros

Cons

"Due to using the open-source version of Talend Data Integration, which lacks a scheduler, our current approach involves developing jobs in Talend, exporting them as Java packages, and utilizing an external scheduler, such as Windows Scheduler, to manage the scheduling process."

"Sometimes there are bugs which are unidentified and we have to follow-up with the Talend team to resolve them. In a critical situation, it takes time for them to update patches."

"The product's setup process could be simpler."

"The tool's technical support needs to be better. It doesn't have a local data center but pushes everything to the cloud. They need to check in with customers to see if they're happy and how well the solutions work. They need to assign a customer success manager for the accounts they sell."

"There are no concurrent licenses, they only have seat licenses on cloud. That's the whole challenge. For example, if in any project your headcount increases or decreases, you do not have that concurrence and you have a seat license, you run into challenges because you have to procure a few more licenses for getting the job done."

"We need more dashboards and reporting engines that can provide detailed information for management. In short, we need better analytics."

"The on-premises setup can be difficult."

"I'd like to see the admin portal for managing the integration server go up a level, to have more capabilities and to be given a more modern web interface."

"The deployment should be simplified."

"I am not satisfied with the solution because it takes too much effort to migrate and add new information. The migration could be easier."

"Documentation needs tuning. There is a lot of dependency with SoftwareAG. Even with the documentation at hand, you can struggle to implement scenarios without SAG’s help. By contrast, IBM’s documentation is self-explanatory, in my opinion."

"In terms of improvements, maybe on the API monetization side, having users able to create separate consumption plans and throttle all those consumption plans towards the run time could be better."

"The product needs to be improved in a few ways. First, they need to stabilize the components of the whole platform across versions. Also, they should stop replacing old components with brand new ones and, rather, improve by evolution."

More webMethods.io cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product pricing is considered very good, especially compared to other data integration tools in the market."

"I have been using the open-source version."

"It is a cost-effective solution."

"Initialy good pricing and good, if it comes to Enterprise license agreements."

"I don’t have much idea about prices, but webMethods API Portal is not something cheaper."

"I do see a lack of capabilities inside of the monetization area for them. They have a cloud infrastructure that is pay per use type of a thing. If you already use 1,000 transactions per se, then you can be charged and billed. I see room for improvement there for their side on that particular capability of the monetization."

"There is a license needed to use the webMethods Integration Server."

"Pricing is the number-one downfall. It's too expensive. They could make more money by dropping the price in half and getting more customers. It's the best product there is, but it's too expensive."

"Sometimes we don't have a very clear idea what the licensing will entail at first, because it can be very customizable. On one hand, this can be a good thing, because it can be tailored to a specific customer's needs. But on the other hand it can also be an issue when some customer asks, "What's the cost?" and we can't yet give them an accurate answer."

"I would like to see better pricing for the license."

More webMethods.io pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

864,155 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Retailer

10%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Talend Data integration?

The product's integration with PostgreSQL and Jira has been helpful for us. Its performance is good. However, we do not use it for large data sets.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Talend Data integration?

The product pricing is considered very good, especially compared to other data integration tools in the market.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Talend Data integration?

The product's setup process could be simpler.

See all answers

What do you like most about Built.io Flow?

The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience.

See all answers

Comparisons

SSIS vs Talend Data Integration

Compared 26% of the time

Talend Open Studio vs Talend Data Integration

Compared 17% of the time

SAP Cloud Platform vs Talend Data Integration

Compared 13% of the time

Palantir Foundry vs Talend Data Integration

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs Talend Data Integration

Compared 10% of the time

More Talend Data Integration Competitors

IBM App Connect vs webMethods.io

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

Apigee vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs webMethods.io

Compared 6% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

More webMethods.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

July 2025

Download Talend Data Integration product report

Buyer's Guide

webMethods.io

July 2025

Download webMethods.io product report

Also Known As

Talend Cloud Integration, Talend Integration Cloud, Talend Cloud Remote Engine for AWS

Built.io Flow, webMethods Integration Server, webMethods Trading Networks, webMethods ActiveTransfer, webMethods.io API

Overview

Talend Data Integration efficiently handles data transformation and integration with ease, supporting complex business needs. It enables seamless data management across all sources.

Talend Data Integration offers a robust platform for managing and transforming data. It connects disparate systems, enabling data flow across various environments. Users benefit from its ability to streamline processes and improve data accuracy. Its user-friendly interface and flexibility make it a preferred choice for data integration experts.

What are the key features of Talend Data Integration?

Data Transformation: Easily transforms diverse data formats to meet specific demands.
Real-time Data Integration: Facilitates immediate data flow for timely decision-making.
Scalability: Supports growing data volumes without compromising performance.
Data Quality Tools: Ensures high-quality data through built-in cleansing and profiling tools.

What benefits should be considered when evaluating Talend Data Integration?

Improved Efficiency: Streamline data processes, reducing time and resource expenditure.
Cost Savings: Minimize manual data handling and associated costs.
Enhanced Accuracy: Benefit from precise data insights due to robust data quality measures.
Flexibility: Cater to diverse data management needs, ensuring future adaptability.

In finance, Talend Data Integration enhances transaction data processing and compliance reporting. In healthcare, it ensures accurate patient data management, while in retail, it optimizes inventory and customer data analysis. Its adaptability makes it valuable across multiple sectors, addressing specific industry requirements.

Talend

webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.

IBM

Sample Customers

ACCOR, ADR, L'OREAL, AstraZeneca

Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings

Buyer's Guide

Talend Data Integration vs. webMethods.io

July 2025

Free Report: Talend Data Integration vs. webMethods.io

Find out what your peers are saying about Talend Data Integration vs. webMethods.io and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

864,155 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Talend Data Integration vs. webMethods.io report.

See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors, best Cloud Data Integration vendors, and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.