We performed a comparison between Symantec Web Application Firewall and Wallarm NG WAF based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."The setup was straightforward."
"The solution has an up-to-date data repository to deal with external threats."
"The interface is user-friendly."
"Helps us to monitor situation in regards to attacks to our sites and prevents a lot of them."
"Sometimes scanning slows down the endpoints."
"I'm not convinced that it's necessary the best solution going forward in the future."
"It would be an improvement if the management dashboards were not reliant upon Java."
"The biggest problem for us was the stability and speed using the first version of Wallarm. Now, it is fine."
Symantec Web Application Firewall is ranked 38th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) while Wallarm NG WAF is ranked 33rd in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Symantec Web Application Firewall is rated 8.4, while Wallarm NG WAF is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Symantec Web Application Firewall writes "An excellent up-to-date data repository handling external threats successfully". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wallarm NG WAF writes "Active threat detection and adaptive rules are the most valuable for us". Symantec Web Application Firewall is most compared with F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), whereas Wallarm NG WAF is most compared with Salt Security, Noname Security, AWS WAF, F5 Advanced WAF and Cloudflare.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.