Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

StarLeaf vs Zoom comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

StarLeaf
Ranking in Virtual Meetings
53rd
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Zoom
Ranking in Virtual Meetings
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
225
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Virtual Meetings category, the mindshare of StarLeaf is 0.1%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zoom is 11.2%, down from 13.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Virtual Meetings
 

Featured Reviews

JS
Easy to use for our clients and was easy to roll out
I would rate it a nine out of ten. It was really easy to roll it out to our users to implement it to an API. It was very seamless. I don't see any lack of features we need. For the purpose of connecting the client and agent, it works very well. I would like the ability to download or retrieve the call history through APIs. There is no way to download the recordings from the meetings because you can record the meeting. The only way to get the recording from the platform is to log in to my strategic portal and download it manually. There is no way to retrieve the link for downloading the recording through API. I would like to see that in the next release.
Luiz Kazan - PeerSpot reviewer
Utilizing versatile features for efficient personal and work meetings
Zoom offers a number of interesting and valuable features. One of the most interesting is the ability to share only audio and provide ambient music without sharing a screen. The breakout room feature is much more developed than other solutions, allowing users to stay in the same meeting and move to different rooms and back to the main room. The sharing features are great for projecting people who should be in focus. Another valuable feature is the virtual entrance, which uses a username and password recognized by the Zoom system, showing the person's full name and ID. Additionally, the use of video and a good fixed background improves visibility compared to other applications. These features differentiate Zoom from others.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The pros are that it's like a global leader. It has a translation project, which is very interesting and important for our users because the minority of them are not able to read and speak in English."
"The product is easy to use."
"The solution is easy to use and loads up documents for sharing."
"This is the easiest product to use for videoconferencing."
"Zoom is easy to use and easy to navigate."
"The solution is easy to use with an easy user interface."
"It has efficient security features as well."
"The product quality is very good."
"It meets all of our basic requirements. It's easy to use."
 

Cons

"We have had some problems with stability. A week ago, we had outaging but it has stablized."
"The video quality should be better. Sometimes when there are updates at the backend, Zoom won't respond properly during that time."
"Zoom should continue to add new features to the product."
"Zoom could improve by being more user-friendly."
"The user interface should be more straightforward and easy to use."
"Technical support is in need of improvement."
"I don't know whose product is at fault, however, if you've ever had to go from Zoom to Teams to WebEx, it really messes around with your device settings."
"There could be more integration options for Zoom."
"I think Zoom is not secure."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"For personal use, I use the free version of Zoom, so I haven't paid anything."
"There is some basic functionality that's free but if you want to host longer meetings and have more participants, then there is a licensing fee."
"I am making yearly payments. So, I am paying 250 USD a year."
"As an organization, we are paying a license fee for Zoom. Personally, I use the free version."
"We have to pay for the product's license."
"There is a free version available with time limits."
"I use the free version that is available, so I'm not sure what the licensing prices are."
"Zoom is free to use."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtual Meetings solutions are best for your needs.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Educational Organization
86%
University
2%
Financial Services Firm
2%
Computer Software Company
2%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
LucidChart vs LucidSpark for brainstorming sessions over Zoom
Hi @Krista Thompson ​ - Yes, LucidSpark is a much more nimble and, in some ways, user-friendly tool than LucidChart. LucidSpark is designed to do a better job managing multiple users participating ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zoom?
Zoom offers a free version for up to forty minutes.
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Kinderspaital Zurich, HGEM, Stronghold
Fortinet, Veeva, Proofpoint, Box, Ticketmaster, Trend Micro, Caesars Entertainment, Santa Clara University, Pandora, Stanford Continuing Studies
Find out what your peers are saying about Zoom Video Communications, Cisco, Microsoft and others in Virtual Meetings. Updated: May 2025.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.