SoapUI vs UiPath Test Cloud comparison

SmartBear and UiPath are both solutions in the API Testing Tools category. SmartBear is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.3, while UiPath is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.9. SmartBear holds a 0.3% mindshare in APIT, compared to UiPath’s 7.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of SmartBear users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

SoapUI

Read 3 SoapUI reviews

78 Views
0 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

UiPath Test Cloud

Read 25 UiPath Test Cloud reviews

1,748 Views
2 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

SoapUI

UiPath Test Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between SoapUI and UiPath Test Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two API Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed SoapUI vs. UiPath Test Cloud Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

SoapUI vs. UiPath Test Cloud

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SoapUI

Ranking in API Testing Tools

12th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

UiPath Test Cloud

Ranking in API Testing Tools

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (3rd), Test Management Tools (6th), Mobile App Testing Tools (3rd), Test Automation Tools (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the API Testing Tools category, the mindshare of SoapUI is 0.3%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Test Cloud is 7.2%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Mahendra Andhale

Test Manager at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Used for API testing and provides Groovy plugin

We use the solution mainly for API testing The solution's most valuable features are the designing of API, Property Transfer feature, and Groovy plugin. The solution should include some plug-ins to share the generated reports over email. Sometimes, Groovy can be a tricky language, and we need to…

Read full review

Manigandan Rajavelu

Sr software engineer at PricewaterhouseCoopers

Comprehensive, good value for money, and a lot of time savings

I discovered a lot of bugs in UiPath Test Suite. If I publish a test case in Test Manager as well as in Orchestrator, the existing test case does not get replaced. It is appending the test case but not replacing it. We want to replace the existing test case, but this functionality is not available. In Test Manager, there are a lot of defects in the ROI report that we provide to the operations team on a monthly basis. It is not very clear and detailed. There is no detailed explanation of every test case. There is only a high-level overview. We cannot download the report from Test Manager. We have to use some other tool, such as Power BI, to view the data.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"SoapUI is a pretty simple tool."

"The solution's most valuable features are the designing of API, Property Transfer feature, and Groovy plugin."

"We need to test the APIs as we build them. I use the product for API testing. You can do AWS security in SoapUI. With SoapUI, we can even perform mutual SSL authentication by incorporating certificates into the SoapUI browser. This allows us to send transactions to the backend downstream."

"It is a very scalable product."

"UiPath Test Cloud definitely helps free up time for other projects for our engineers."

"It's effective at testing whatever automation we've built or making sure the automation we've built is working fine."

"UiPath's tools are generally designed for business users, so they can be as simple or as complex as needed."

"It is feature-rich. It has more features than other RPA tools."

"We could use it for Oracle and SAP and it did help significantly."

"In terms of integration with other lifecycle tools and applications, UiPath Test Suite works very well because of the basis of RPA, and how RPA and automation can handle different applications and different areas of expertise."

"The console, in a single pane, allows us to understand where we are in the testing environment."

More UiPath Test Cloud pros

Cons

"The product needs to be available as an extension for the Chrome browser."

"The solution should include some plug-ins to share the generated reports over email."

"There are more advanced API testing tools than SoapUI, and SoapUI could be made better."

"We are facing problems specifically with Desk Manager."

"They can improve the dashboard by adding some widgets for reporting."

"They can improve the dashboard by adding some widgets for reporting. Also, currently, they don't have defect management modules."

"The test manager component could be improved."

"There is room for improvement in terms of introducing framework compatibility. Many companies use test automation as an alternative to Selenium but need to develop a fully functional bot in UiPath to test on it, which is inefficient."

"There is room for improvement in terms of introducing framework compatibility."

"The pricing isn't as low as other options."

"I don't rate its ability to automate very well."

More UiPath Test Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"SoapUI is a cheap tool that does not have an expensive license."

"SoapUI is an open-source solution."

"I don't necessarily have a problem with the pricing of the UiPath Test Suite, especially because we're using the testing bot licenses as opposed to the unattended licensing."

"Regarding the pricing model, I believe it would be beneficial to combine it with some of the other platform aspects."

"One robot license costs 1,500 euros."

"It is a little bit more expensive than Selenium, but it provides value for money. There are multiple types of licenses such as the Test Suite license, Studio Pro license, Test Manager license, and Test Robot license. The overall cost estimation is 13,800 dollars."

"I am not aware of the exact cost. It seems reasonable, but it is an additional cost."

"When we decided to buy the solution three and a half years ago, it was fairly priced."

"Its price is a bit high."

"It represents good value for the investment."

More UiPath Test Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about SoapUI?

We need to test the APIs as we build them. I use the product for API testing. You can do AWS security in SoapUI. With SoapUI, we can even perform mutual SSL authentication by incorporating certific...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SoapUI?

The solution should include some plug-ins to share the generated reports over email. Sometimes, Groovy can be a tricky language, and we need to focus more on that.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SoapUI?

We use the solution mainly for API testing.

See all answers

What do you like most about UiPath Test Suite?

Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Test Suite?

I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced p...

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite?

They can improve the dashboard by adding some widgets for reporting. Also, currently, they don't have defect management modules. If they could add defect management, it could work independently wit...

See all answers

Comparisons

Apache JMeter vs SoapUI

Compared 100% of the time

More SoapUI Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 45% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 18% of the time

Eggplant Test vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 9% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 7% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

More UiPath Test Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

API Testing Tools

June 2025

Download SoapUI product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Test Cloud

May 2025

Download UiPath Test Cloud product report

Also Known As

No data available

Test Suite

Overview

SoapUI is a leading tool for testing SOAP and REST web services, known for its robust functionality and user-friendly interface. It supports functional, automated, and load testing, and offers powerful scripting and automation. Organizations appreciate its efficiency, protocol flexibility, and integration capabilities.

SmartBear

UiPath Test Cloud revolutionizes testing through advanced AI agents, enhancing productivity in software assessment.

UiPath Test Cloud, with its AI-augmented automation, offers testers enterprise-grade capabilities for over 190 technologies. Featuring seamless integration with tools like Orchestrator and CI/CD pipelines, it streamlines testing processes and cuts maintenance costs. While users value its functionalities, the need for enhancements in mobile automation and third-party integration, particularly with Jira, is recognized. Efficient test organization through Test Manager and simplified process management via the cloud are noteworthy. Enhancements in reporting and file management are sought, highlighting areas for development.

What are the key features of UiPath Test Cloud?

Drag-and-Drop Programming: Enables easy test creation with minimal technical knowledge.
Robust Robotic Functionality: Offers reliable automation across a wide array of technologies.
API Integration: Ensures seamless connectivity with existing systems.
Detailed Logging: Provides comprehensive logs for better analysis and debugging.
Test Manager: Organizes tests efficiently and simplifies management.

What benefits should users evaluate in UiPath Test Cloud?

Enhanced Productivity: Accelerates test creation and execution.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces manual effort and maintenance expenses.
Cross-Platform Support: Offers flexibility in testing across different environments.
Improved Quality: Delivers high-quality software with speed and efficiency.

Organizations across industries utilize UiPath Test Cloud for testing types such as origination, smoke, and web application testing. Common implementations include testing in supply chain management, regression testing, and integrating workflows. Teams find it beneficial for ensuring functionality and efficiency in mobile app testing, enabling cross-platform support for RPA and applications like Oracle and SAP.

UiPath

Buyer's Guide

SoapUI vs. UiPath Test Cloud

June 2025

Free Report: SoapUI vs. UiPath Test Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about SoapUI vs. UiPath Test Cloud and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SoapUI vs. UiPath Test Cloud report.

See our list of best API Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all API Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.