Parasoft SOAtest vs SoapUI comparison

Parasoft and SmartBear are both solutions in the API Testing Tools category. Parasoft is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.7, while SmartBear is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.3. Parasoft holds a 4.1% mindshare in APIT, compared to SmartBear’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Parasoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SmartBear users who would recommend it.

Parasoft SOAtest

Read 33 Parasoft SOAtest reviews

2,949 Views
796 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

SoapUI

Read 3 SoapUI reviews

326 Views
326 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Parasoft SOAtest

SoapUI

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Parasoft SOAtest and SoapUI compete in the API testing category. Parasoft SOAtest seems to have the upper hand with its comprehensive feature set.

Features: Parasoft SOAtest is highly regarded for its extensive reporting capabilities, automation features, and integration with other testing tools. SoapUI is praised for its straightforward test creation and execution, as well as strong open-source support. Parasoft SOAtest's rich feature set offers more advanced options, making it preferred for complex testing environments.

Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest could enhance ease of use, user documentation, and interface intuitiveness. SoapUI needs better performance, advanced debugging capabilities, and comprehensive user documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft SOAtest has a complex deployment process but responsive customer service. SoapUI offers simpler deployment and satisfactory community support but lacks dedicated customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest is more expensive but justifiable by its advanced capabilities, leading to higher ROI for large-scale operations. SoapUI provides a cost-effective solution with quicker ROI for smaller projects due to its open-source model and lower initial setup costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Parasoft SOAtest vs. SoapUI Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest vs. SoapUI

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,797 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Parasoft SOAtest

Ranking in API Testing Tools

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (20th), Functional Testing Tools (16th), Test Automation Tools (14th)

SoapUI

Ranking in API Testing Tools

11th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the API Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Parasoft SOAtest is 4.1%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SoapUI is 1.8%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Parasoft SOAtest	4.1%
SoapUI	1.8%
Other	94.1%

API Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer2772063

Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Has reduced manual testing effort with customization options but occasionally crashes during complex executions

One improvement would be to integrate it with modern technologies such as AI, so we can generate test cases by providing the details so that it can generate the structure, and later the person working can modify and enhance it. We can add more customized tools, and reporting can be enhanced. Currently, the reporting part is at a step level, and it does not give details for a particular test case, so improvements in those areas would be beneficial. There are performance issues where the tool crashes sometimes. In particular use cases with numerous steps, it experiences crashes. I have encountered stability and performance issues with it.

Read full review

Mahendra Andhale

Test Manager at Happiest Minds Technologies

Used for API testing and provides Groovy plugin

We use the solution mainly for API testing The solution's most valuable features are the designing of API, Property Transfer feature, and Groovy plugin. The solution should include some plug-ins to share the generated reports over email. Sometimes, Groovy can be a tricky language, and we need to…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Parasoft SOAtest has improved the quality of our automated web services, which can be easily implemented through service chaining and service virtualization."

"Every imaginable source in the entire world of information technology can be accessed and used."

"Parasoft SOAtest improves the quality of the application, increases security and security compliance, and it is a cost-effective tool."

"The solution is scalable."

"Since the solution has both command line and automation options, it generates good reports."

"The best feature of Parasoft SOAtest is the extension tool where we can write our custom scripts, integrate with different languages, and customize as per our needs, which helps in a very positive way where things are not available beforehand; we can test with service virtualization."

"Generating new messages, based on the existing .EDN and .XML messages, is a crucial part or the testing project that I’m currently in."

"If you want something that’s not provided out of the box, then you can write it yourself and integrate it with SOAtest."

More Parasoft SOAtest pros

"SoapUI is a pretty simple tool."

"The solution's most valuable features are the designing of API, Property Transfer feature, and Groovy plugin."

"We need to test the APIs as we build them. I use the product for API testing. You can do AWS security in SoapUI. With SoapUI, we can even perform mutual SSL authentication by incorporating certificates into the SoapUI browser. This allows us to send transactions to the backend downstream."

Cons

"The summary reports could be improved."

"The performance could be a bit better."

"The product is very slow to start up, and that is a bit of a problem, actually."

"The feedback that we received from the DevOps of our organization was that the tool was a little heavy from the transformation perspective."

"Tuning the tool takes time because it gives quite a long list of warnings."

"Compatibility with HTTP 1.1 and TLS 1.2 needs to be improved."

"One area that could use improvement is the cryptography capabilities in Parasoft SOAtest. It did not support enough of the protocols or cryptography formats we needed, which led us to create our own solutions."

"Reporting facilities can be better."

More Parasoft SOAtest cons

"There are more advanced API testing tools than SoapUI, and SoapUI could be made better."

"The product needs to be available as an extension for the Chrome browser."

"The solution should include some plug-ins to share the generated reports over email."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is an expensive product, so think carefully about whether it fits your purposes and is the right tool for you."

"From what I understand, Parasoft SOAtest isn't the cheapest option. But it has a lot to offer."

"The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process."

"We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%."

"They do have a confusing licensing structure."

"The cost of Parasoft seems to have gotten higher with a projection that wasn't really stipulated for our company. They've done a tremendous job at negotiating those deals."

"The price is around $5,000 USD."

"I think it would be a great step to decrease the price of the licenses."

"SoapUI is an open-source solution."

"SoapUI is a cheap tool that does not have an expensive license."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

University

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	23

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Parasoft SOAtest?

I am not involved in the pricing aspect, setup cost, or licensing cost of Parasoft SOAtest. Our dedicated tools and support teams handle those aspects.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Parasoft SOAtest?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Parasoft SOAtest?

We use Parasoft SOAtest for API testing and service virtualization with responder setup. Service virtualization is very helpful in our testing. When any downstream system is not available or we are...

See all answers

What do you like most about SoapUI?

We need to test the APIs as we build them. I use the product for API testing. You can do AWS security in SoapUI. With SoapUI, we can even perform mutual SSL authentication by incorporating certific...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SoapUI?

The solution should include some plug-ins to share the generated reports over email. Sometimes, Groovy can be a tricky language, and we need to focus more on that.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SoapUI?

We use the solution mainly for API testing.

See all answers

Comparisons

Postman Enterprise vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 8% of the time

SonarQube vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 8% of the time

ReadyAPI vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 5% of the time

ReadyAPI Test vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 5% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 4% of the time

More Parasoft SOAtest Competitors

Apache JMeter vs SoapUI

Compared 53% of the time

ReadyAPI Test vs SoapUI

Compared 23% of the time

More SoapUI Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest

March 2026

Download Parasoft SOAtest product report

Buyer's Guide

API Testing Tools

March 2026

Download SoapUI product report

Also Known As

SOAtest

No data available

Overview

Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).

SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.

Parasoft

SoapUI is a leading tool for testing SOAP and REST web services, known for its robust functionality and user-friendly interface. It supports functional, automated, and load testing, and offers powerful scripting and automation. Organizations appreciate its efficiency, protocol flexibility, and integration capabilities.

SmartBear

Sample Customers

Charter Communications, Sabre, Caesars Entertainment, Charles Schwab, ING, Intel, Northbridge Financial, Capital Services, WoodmenLife

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest vs. SoapUI

March 2026

Free Report: Parasoft SOAtest vs. SoapUI

Find out what your peers are saying about Parasoft SOAtest vs. SoapUI and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Parasoft SOAtest vs. SoapUI report.

See our list of best API Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all API Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.