Parasoft SOAtest vs SoapUI comparison

Parasoft and SmartBear are both solutions in the API Testing Tools category. Parasoft is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.7, while SmartBear is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.0. Parasoft holds a 5.2% mindshare in APIT, compared to SmartBear’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Parasoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SmartBear users who would recommend it.

Parasoft SOAtest

Read 33 Parasoft SOAtest reviews

5,105 Views
1,378 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

SoapUI

Read 4 SoapUI reviews

598 Views
598 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Parasoft SOAtest

SoapUI

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Parasoft SOAtest and SoapUI compete in the API testing category. Parasoft SOAtest seems to have the upper hand with its comprehensive feature set.

Features: Parasoft SOAtest is highly regarded for its extensive reporting capabilities, automation features, and integration with other testing tools. SoapUI is praised for its straightforward test creation and execution, as well as strong open-source support. Parasoft SOAtest's rich feature set offers more advanced options, making it preferred for complex testing environments.

Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest could enhance ease of use, user documentation, and interface intuitiveness. SoapUI needs better performance, advanced debugging capabilities, and comprehensive user documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft SOAtest has a complex deployment process but responsive customer service. SoapUI offers simpler deployment and satisfactory community support but lacks dedicated customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest is more expensive but justifiable by its advanced capabilities, leading to higher ROI for large-scale operations. SoapUI provides a cost-effective solution with quicker ROI for smaller projects due to its open-source model and lower initial setup costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Parasoft SOAtest vs. SoapUI Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest vs. SoapUI

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Parasoft SOAtest

Ranking in API Testing Tools

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (20th), Functional Testing Tools (14th), Test Automation Tools (14th)

SoapUI

Ranking in API Testing Tools

13th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the API Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Parasoft SOAtest is 5.2%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SoapUI is 1.9%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Parasoft SOAtest	5.2%
SoapUI	1.9%
Other	92.9%

API Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer2772063

Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Has reduced manual testing effort with customization options but occasionally crashes during complex executions

One improvement would be to integrate it with modern technologies such as AI, so we can generate test cases by providing the details so that it can generate the structure, and later the person working can modify and enhance it. We can add more customized tools, and reporting can be enhanced. Currently, the reporting part is at a step level, and it does not give details for a particular test case, so improvements in those areas would be beneficial. There are performance issues where the tool crashes sometimes. In particular use cases with numerous steps, it experiences crashes. I have encountered stability and performance issues with it.

Read full review

PramodChaudharyDarwha

Manager at tcs

Organizing and sharing reusable API test suites has improved our team’s regression testing

SoapUI is really great for my team because when we are trying to create test cases and the requests that we are going to send to an API, we can create one SoapUI folder which will be XML and this XML is used by SoapUI itself. If we want to share whatever request we are running on my system with another person, we can export the test suite that we are working on and give it to another person. It is shareable through file upload and download. However, we cannot share it through a link or something implemented on the cloud. The best feature of SoapUI is that we can build a suite in SoapUI. When we build a suite, it creates a kind of directory where we can organize our tests in one place, and then we can share it. Another best feature is that we can execute the tests that we want to do on API level in a sequential fashion or in parallel, through synchronous or asynchronous calls. For the feature where we can organize and share test suites, because we have the test suite now, there are many things that we want to check manually. This suite can be shared with a team, and then the suite can be divided into parts or we can divide the work by sharing the suite. We can update the suite and then we can make a final suite that will be useful for next iterations. This has helped us in creating a very efficient test suite and a way to organize our test cases and regression suite.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Parasoft SOAtest improves the quality of the application, increases security and security compliance, and it is a cost-effective tool."

"Since the solution has both command line and automation options, it generates good reports."

"It is widely recognized as the leading enterprise-grade solution for API testing and API integrity."

"Web services and API test automation was made simple without writing much code."

"In general, this is a hassle free, user friendly tool and it doesn't require much knowledge if you're using the manual testing."

"Good write and read files which save execution inputs and outputs and can be stored locally."

"It improved my project ROI in various portions of the testing life cycle."

"We don’t have to manually create .EDN and .XML messages, because we can do this with just one click now, which drastically decreases the time that is required to create these messages."

More Parasoft SOAtest pros

"The solution's most valuable features are the designing of API, Property Transfer feature, and Groovy plugin."

"We need to test the APIs as we build them. I use the product for API testing. You can do AWS security in SoapUI. With SoapUI, we can even perform mutual SSL authentication by incorporating certificates into the SoapUI browser. This allows us to send transactions to the backend downstream."

"SoapUI is really great for my team because when we are trying to create test cases and the requests that we are going to send to an API, we can create one SoapUI folder which will be XML and this XML is used by SoapUI itself."

"SoapUI is a pretty simple tool."

Cons

"The GUI should get a facelift to make it more user-friendly."

"The performance could be a bit better."

"Performance issues if there are too many sessions open on your system."

"I personally feel that 50% of Parasoft features are provided by SoapUI free of cost."

"Sadly, almost everything needs improving."

"More descriptive reports are needed."

"In general, its user-friendliness needs a little improvement since there are a few bugs that still remain."

"Work file [tst] gradually increases in size due to saving or updates of workspace. I can see a major improvement in that."

More Parasoft SOAtest cons

"The product needs to be available as an extension for the Chrome browser."

"The solution should include some plug-ins to share the generated reports over email."

"SoapUI is not that scalable."

"There are more advanced API testing tools than SoapUI, and SoapUI could be made better."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is an expensive product, so think carefully about whether it fits your purposes and is the right tool for you."

"We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%."

"The cost of Parasoft seems to have gotten higher with a projection that wasn't really stipulated for our company. They've done a tremendous job at negotiating those deals."

"I think it would be a great step to decrease the price of the licenses."

"They do have a confusing licensing structure."

"The price is around $5,000 USD."

"From what I understand, Parasoft SOAtest isn't the cheapest option. But it has a lot to offer."

"The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process."

"SoapUI is a cheap tool that does not have an expensive license."

"SoapUI is an open-source solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Construction Company

Healthcare Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	23

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Parasoft SOAtest?

I am not involved in the pricing aspect, setup cost, or licensing cost of Parasoft SOAtest. Our dedicated tools and support teams handle those aspects.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Parasoft SOAtest?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Parasoft SOAtest?

We use Parasoft SOAtest for API testing and service virtualization with responder setup. Service virtualization is very helpful in our testing. When any downstream system is not available or we are...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SoapUI?

One area where improvement can be made is the user interface. The user interface is pretty understandable compared to another platform like Postman. It is very minimal in terms of what we can see o...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SoapUI?

I have been working as a software development engineer for five years and have been using SoapUI for almost five years. We were working with REST APIs, and although there are other tools available ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering SoapUI?

I suggest starting with a clearer goal, which will help. Begin with a few APIs, testing them manually, and then trying the features such as simpler automation or sequential and parallel running of ...

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 7% of the time

Postman Enterprise vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 6% of the time

ReadyAPI Test vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 5% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 5% of the time

Apache JMeter vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 2% of the time

More Parasoft SOAtest Competitors

Apache JMeter vs SoapUI

Compared 47% of the time

ReadyAPI Test vs SoapUI

Compared 21% of the time

More SoapUI Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest

June 2026

Download Parasoft SOAtest product report

Buyer's Guide

API Testing Tools

May 2026

Download SoapUI product report

Also Known As

SOAtest

No data available

Overview

Parasoft SOAtest is a robust tool for automating test scenarios, supporting a range of interfaces and protocols, making it ideal for comprehensive service testing. Its adaptability in complex environments provides extensive testing capabilities for UI and API automation.

Parasoft SOAtest offers a comprehensive suite of features designed for the efficient setup of functional tests, emphasizing ease in data-driven scenarios and thorough automation. Supporting key protocols like SOAP and REST, alongside UI recording, it integrates seamlessly with Jenkins and GitHub, adding service virtualization for enhanced end-to-end testing. Users benefit from its extensibility through custom scripts, allowing broad API and web service testing. However, there are challenges in user-friendliness, with the graphical interface requiring improvements. Reporting features need enhanced clarity and customization options. Limited cryptography support and documentation necessitate improvement. Performance issues and high pricing are noted drawbacks, but its use in banking and quality enhancement demonstrates significant potential.

What are the key features of Parasoft SOAtest?

Rapid functional test setup: Streamlines the creation of test scenarios efficiently.
Data-driven testing: Enables easy configuration with different datasets.
Extensive automation: Facilitates comprehensive testing for APIs and UIs.
Protocol support: Integrates SOAP, REST, JSON, SAP RFC functionalities.
Service virtualization: Enhances testing across complex system architectures.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Improved testing efficiency: Reduces manual testing efforts significantly.
Enhanced quality assurance: Elevates application reliability and performance.
Integration capabilities: Coordinates well with Jenkins and GitHub for streamlined processes.
Comprehensive testing: Provides thorough coverage for APIs and web services.

Implementing Parasoft SOAtest in industries like banking allows automation of regression tests for web services in SOA architectures, supporting protocols such as ISO 8583. Companies use it to transition from manual testing to automation, integrating JSON and XML, facilitating improved application quality.

Parasoft

SoapUI is a leading tool for testing SOAP and REST web services, known for its robust functionality and user-friendly interface. It supports functional, automated, and load testing, and offers powerful scripting and automation. Organizations appreciate its efficiency, protocol flexibility, and integration capabilities.

SmartBear

Sample Customers

Charter Communications, Sabre, Caesars Entertainment, Charles Schwab, ING, Intel, Northbridge Financial, Capital Services, WoodmenLife

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest vs. SoapUI

June 2026

Free Report: Parasoft SOAtest vs. SoapUI

Find out what your peers are saying about Parasoft SOAtest vs. SoapUI and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Parasoft SOAtest vs. SoapUI report.

See our list of best API Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all API Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.