Parasoft SOAtest vs SoapUI comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Parasoft and SmartBear are both solutions in the API Testing Tools category. Parasoft is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.7, while SmartBear is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.5. Parasoft holds a 5.7% mindshare in APIT, compared to SmartBear’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Parasoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SmartBear users who would recommend it.

Parasoft SOAtest

Read 33 Parasoft SOAtest reviews

8,004 Views
2,241 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

SoapUI

Read 5 SoapUI reviews

1,058 Views
1,058 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Parasoft SOAtest

SoapUI

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Parasoft SOAtest and SoapUI compete in the API testing category. Parasoft SOAtest seems to have the upper hand with its comprehensive feature set.

Features: Parasoft SOAtest is highly regarded for its extensive reporting capabilities, automation features, and integration with other testing tools. SoapUI is praised for its straightforward test creation and execution, as well as strong open-source support. Parasoft SOAtest's rich feature set offers more advanced options, making it preferred for complex testing environments.

Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest could enhance ease of use, user documentation, and interface intuitiveness. SoapUI needs better performance, advanced debugging capabilities, and comprehensive user documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft SOAtest has a complex deployment process but responsive customer service. SoapUI offers simpler deployment and satisfactory community support but lacks dedicated customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest is more expensive but justifiable by its advanced capabilities, leading to higher ROI for large-scale operations. SoapUI provides a cost-effective solution with quicker ROI for smaller projects due to its open-source model and lower initial setup costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Parasoft SOAtest vs. SoapUI Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest vs. SoapUI

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Parasoft SOAtest

Ranking in API Testing Tools

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (26th), Functional Testing Tools (11th), Test Automation Tools (15th)

SoapUI

Ranking in API Testing Tools

10th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the API Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Parasoft SOAtest is 5.7%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SoapUI is 2.0%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Parasoft SOAtest	5.7%
SoapUI	2.0%
Other	92.3%

API Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer2772063

Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Has reduced manual testing effort with customization options but occasionally crashes during complex executions

One improvement would be to integrate it with modern technologies such as AI, so we can generate test cases by providing the details so that it can generate the structure, and later the person working can modify and enhance it. We can add more customized tools, and reporting can be enhanced. Currently, the reporting part is at a step level, and it does not give details for a particular test case, so improvements in those areas would be beneficial. There are performance issues where the tool crashes sometimes. In particular use cases with numerous steps, it experiences crashes. I have encountered stability and performance issues with it.

Read full review

PramodChaudharyDarwha

Manager at TCS

Organizing and sharing reusable API test suites has improved our team’s regression testing

SoapUI is really great for my team because when we are trying to create test cases and the requests that we are going to send to an API, we can create one SoapUI folder which will be XML and this XML is used by SoapUI itself. If we want to share whatever request we are running on my system with another person, we can export the test suite that we are working on and give it to another person. It is shareable through file upload and download. However, we cannot share it through a link or something implemented on the cloud. The best feature of SoapUI is that we can build a suite in SoapUI. When we build a suite, it creates a kind of directory where we can organize our tests in one place, and then we can share it. Another best feature is that we can execute the tests that we want to do on API level in a sequential fashion or in parallel, through synchronous or asynchronous calls. For the feature where we can organize and share test suites, because we have the test suite now, there are many things that we want to check manually. This suite can be shared with a team, and then the suite can be divided into parts or we can divide the work by sharing the suite. We can update the suite and then we can make a final suite that will be useful for next iterations. This has helped us in creating a very efficient test suite and a way to organize our test cases and regression suite.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One key feature of using SOAtest tool is that it provided us early entry in testing cycle without any services."

"The solution is scalable."

"Web services and API test automation was made simple without writing much code."

"It improved my project ROI in various portions of the testing life cycle."

"Parasoft is a bundle of tools like FTP, Database, Web services, and Java, and with just one click I can access any of these utilities, which is currently saving lots of my time."

"The testing time is shortened because we generate test data automatically with SOAtest."

"As an expert user, you can accomplish a lot with this tool."

"Every imaginable source in the entire world of information technology can be accessed and used."

More Parasoft SOAtest pros

"The solution's most valuable features are the designing of API, Property Transfer feature, and Groovy plugin."

"SoapUI has really made that possible for us."

"We need to test the APIs as we build them. I use the product for API testing. You can do AWS security in SoapUI. With SoapUI, we can even perform mutual SSL authentication by incorporating certificates into the SoapUI browser. This allows us to send transactions to the backend downstream."

"SoapUI is a pretty simple tool."

"SoapUI is really great for my team because when we are trying to create test cases and the requests that we are going to send to an API, we can create one SoapUI folder which will be XML and this XML is used by SoapUI itself."

Cons

"There are performance issues where the tool crashes sometimes. In particular use cases with numerous steps, it experiences crashes."

"From an automation point of view, it should have better clarity and be more user friendly."

"I was having trouble with the browser automation on my Mac laptop."

"The feedback that we received from the DevOps of our organization was that the tool was a little heavy from the transformation perspective."

"UI testing should be more in-depth."

"Parasoft SOAtest has an internal refresh function where you can refresh the software to show the changes you’ve made in your projects. Unfortunately this function does not work properly, because it often does not show the changes after you’ve hit te refresh button a few times."

"The need to refresh 'Test Case Explorer' when adding a data source or environment file, can be improved."

"We have good support of our solution architect of Parasoft, but sometimes they don’t know all the answers and then it’s harder to find more knowledge in technical support from US teams, which slows things down."

More Parasoft SOAtest cons

"The solution should include some plug-ins to share the generated reports over email."

"The product needs to be available as an extension for the Chrome browser."

"SoapUI is not that scalable."

"If we could have more sharing capability within teams or its own structure, that would help."

"There are more advanced API testing tools than SoapUI, and SoapUI could be made better."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is around $5,000 USD."

"We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%."

"They do have a confusing licensing structure."

"The cost of Parasoft seems to have gotten higher with a projection that wasn't really stipulated for our company. They've done a tremendous job at negotiating those deals."

"I think it would be a great step to decrease the price of the licenses."

"It is an expensive product, so think carefully about whether it fits your purposes and is the right tool for you."

"The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process."

"From what I understand, Parasoft SOAtest isn't the cheapest option. But it has a lot to offer."

"SoapUI is a cheap tool that does not have an expensive license."

"SoapUI is an open-source solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Construction Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

29%

Program Development Consultancy

24%

Outsourcing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	23

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Parasoft SOAtest?

I am not involved in the pricing aspect, setup cost, or licensing cost of Parasoft SOAtest. Our dedicated tools and support teams handle those aspects.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Parasoft SOAtest?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Parasoft SOAtest?

We use Parasoft SOAtest for API testing and service virtualization with responder setup. Service virtualization is very helpful in our testing. When any downstream system is not available or we are...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SoapUI?

SoapUI is pretty good overall. If we could have more sharing capability within teams or its own structure, that would help. A workspace where two or three people can join and contribute on a single...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SoapUI?

We use SoapUI for testing the API requests and the authentication rules of APIs, and we also check if we are getting the output of the API correctly and if it is not bypassing the test cases. A sce...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering SoapUI?

I would tell others to try to use SoapUI more often so that they will get more familiar with it, and they can surely purchase this product as it is a great tool. I would rate this product an 8 out ...

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 6% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 5% of the time

ReadyAPI Test vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 5% of the time

Postman Enterprise vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 4% of the time

Apache JMeter vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 2% of the time

More Parasoft SOAtest Competitors

Apache JMeter vs SoapUI

Compared 31% of the time

ReadyAPI Test vs SoapUI

Compared 13% of the time

Postman Enterprise vs SoapUI

Compared 5% of the time

SmartBear API Hub vs SoapUI

Compared 5% of the time

Loadmill vs SoapUI

Compared 5% of the time

More SoapUI Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest

October 2026

Download Parasoft SOAtest product report

Buyer's Guide

API Testing Tools

October 2026

Download SoapUI product report

Also Known As

SOAtest

No data available

Overview

Parasoft SOAtest is a robust tool for automating test scenarios, supporting a range of interfaces and protocols, making it ideal for comprehensive service testing. Its adaptability in complex environments provides extensive testing capabilities for UI and API automation.

Parasoft SOAtest offers a comprehensive suite of features designed for the efficient setup of functional tests, emphasizing ease in data-driven scenarios and thorough automation. Supporting key protocols like SOAP and REST, alongside UI recording, it integrates seamlessly with Jenkins and GitHub, adding service virtualization for enhanced end-to-end testing. Users benefit from its extensibility through custom scripts, allowing broad API and web service testing. However, there are challenges in user-friendliness, with the graphical interface requiring improvements. Reporting features need enhanced clarity and customization options. Limited cryptography support and documentation necessitate improvement. Performance issues and high pricing are noted drawbacks, but its use in banking and quality enhancement demonstrates significant potential.

What are the key features of Parasoft SOAtest?

Rapid functional test setup: Streamlines the creation of test scenarios efficiently.
Data-driven testing: Enables easy configuration with different datasets.
Extensive automation: Facilitates comprehensive testing for APIs and UIs.
Protocol support: Integrates SOAP, REST, JSON, SAP RFC functionalities.
Service virtualization: Enhances testing across complex system architectures.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Improved testing efficiency: Reduces manual testing efforts significantly.
Enhanced quality assurance: Elevates application reliability and performance.
Integration capabilities: Coordinates well with Jenkins and GitHub for streamlined processes.
Comprehensive testing: Provides thorough coverage for APIs and web services.

Implementing Parasoft SOAtest in industries like banking allows automation of regression tests for web services in SOA architectures, supporting protocols such as ISO 8583. Companies use it to transition from manual testing to automation, integrating JSON and XML, facilitating improved application quality.

Parasoft

SoapUI is a leading tool for testing SOAP and REST web services, known for its robust functionality and user-friendly interface. It supports functional, automated, and load testing, and offers powerful scripting and automation. Organizations appreciate its efficiency, protocol flexibility, and integration capabilities.

SmartBear

Sample Customers

Charter Communications, Sabre, Caesars Entertainment, Charles Schwab, ING, Intel, Northbridge Financial, Capital Services, WoodmenLife

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest vs. SoapUI

September 2026

Free Report: Parasoft SOAtest vs. SoapUI

Find out what your peers are saying about Parasoft SOAtest vs. SoapUI and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Parasoft SOAtest vs. SoapUI report.

See our list of best API Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all API Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.