OpenText Silk Test vs TestProject [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

OpenText and Tricentis are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Additionally, 93% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 71% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

OpenText Silk Test

Read 17 OpenText Silk Test reviews

3,255 Views
2,181 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

TestProject [EOL]

Read 6 TestProject [EOL] reviews

71% willing to recommend

OpenText Silk Test

TestProject [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText Silk Test and TestProject [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Katalon Studio, Worksoft and others in Test Automation Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Test Automation Tools Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 914,351 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Silk Test

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (19th), Regression Testing Tools (9th), Test Automation Tools (18th)

TestProject [EOL]

Average Rating

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Jose Alfredo Garcia

Manager of Central Excellence at Alpura

Easy to set up with good documentation and easy management of testing cycles

The solution allows for a complete test cycle. The management of testing cycles are easy. We have good control over test cases. We can capture functional testing very easily. We're actually able to accelerate testing now and have end-to-end cycles for testing. We didn't used to have these capabilities. It's easy to automate and accelerate testing. The product offers very good cross-browser testing capabilities. We can do continuous testing and regression testing.

Read full review

Ashu Singh

Senior quality analyst at Lalli

An easy-to-use tool that saves time and functions within a limited budget

The solution's reporting system should be clearer and easier to understand for a layperson. I and some other experts may be able to understand the solution's reporting system, but a layperson won't understand it. For a layperson, the solution should be easy to use. Price-wise, TestProject is an expensive product. The product's current price should be lowered to attract potential customers.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"A good automation tool that supports SAP functional testing."

"The solution is user-friendly with respect to automation."

"The scalability of the solution is quite good. You can easily expand the product if you need to."

"SilkTest is best for desktop applications and good for web applications also with the Open agent."

"It drastically reduced our manual regression efforts that is difficult to achieve in Agile model."

"The feature I like most is the ease of reporting, as you get a single frame of reporting across all the various tests and the program is very user-friendly."

"The major thing it has helped with is to reduce the workload on testing activities."

"The Silk4J feature is the solution's most valuable aspect."

More OpenText Silk Test pros

"The ease of web and mobile functional testing is pretty easy on TestProject."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"The product has a very good record-and-play functionality."

"The script-less part of it was good for novice users."

"Since implementing this solution, our code management has been reduced by 40% to 60%."

"One of the valuable features the solution offers is the chance to be able to perform automatic tests by recording, and to create them without having coding knowledge."

"Ability to carry out automatic testing without having coding knowledge."

"The automation and AI are very good."

Cons

"We moved to Ranorex because the solution did not easily scale, and we could not find good and short term third-party help."

"I've seen a lot of potential users upset with the SilkTest due to broken installation."

"The browser based testing needs to be improved."

"The pricing is an issue, the program is very expensive. That is something that can improve."

"Implementing a better integration with Git. It was extremely painful to implement the link from Silk Central to Git."

"Could be more user-friendly on the installation and configuration side."

"The pricing could be improved."

"We moved to Ranorex because the solution did not easily scale, and we could not find good and short term third-party help. We needed to have a bigger pool of third-party contractors that we could draw on for specific implementations. Silk didn't have that, and we found what we needed for Ranorex here in the Houston area. It would be good if there is more community support. I don't know if Silk runs a user conference once a year and how they set up partners. We need to be able to talk to somebody more than just on the phone. It really comes right down to that. The generated automated script was highly dependent upon screen position and other keys that were not as robust as we wanted. We found the automated script generated by Ranorex and the other key information about a specific data point to be more robust. It handled the transition better when we moved from computer to computer and from one size of the application to the other size. When we restarted Silk, we typically had to recalibrate screen elements within the script. Ranorex also has some of these same issues, but when we restart, it typically is faster, which is important."

More OpenText Silk Test cons

"I have had some difficulty trying to configure it on several browsers."

"I and some other experts may be able to understand the solution's reporting system, but a layperson won't understand it."

"We'd like to see a direct cloud from TestProject instead of some other third party."

"TestProject needs better support for integration with other products to provide a better overall solution for test planning and test data management."

"Technical support is an area they need to work on, they are too slow to resolve issues."

"In an upcoming release, there should be a SaaS offering available."

"The support is a weak point since they discontinued the tool."

"Difficult trying to configure on more than one browser."

More TestProject [EOL] cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We paid annually. There is a purchase cost, and then there is an ongoing maintenance fee."

"Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and while I think that the price is quite reasonable I am not allowed to share those details."

"Price-wise, TestProject is an expensive product...With TestProject, there is a need to pay a certain amount towards its licensing costs."

"The solution is free."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

914,351 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Construction Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	1

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 10% of the time

Selenium HQ vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 7% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 6% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Silk Test Competitors

Testim vs TestProject [EOL]

Compared 23% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs TestProject [EOL]

Compared 21% of the time

Katalon Studio vs TestProject [EOL]

Compared 20% of the time

BrowserStack vs TestProject [EOL]

Compared 18% of the time

TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) vs TestProject [EOL]

Compared 18% of the time

More TestProject [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Silk Test

September 2026

Download OpenText Silk Test product report

Buyer's Guide

TestProject [EOL]

September 2026

Download TestProject [EOL] product report

Also Known As

Segue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test

No data available

Overview

OpenText Silk Test is a versatile automated testing tool known for its advanced scripting and recording capabilities in Visual Studio. It offers robust test case management, supporting cross-browser testing and seamless integration with Java and C#, providing a stable environment for automation.

OpenText Silk Test supports GUI object recognition and offers a user-friendly interface that facilitates multi-language support. It enhances test design with its object-oriented approach and integrates performance testing tools for precise data-driven tests. Silk Test excels in browser testing and performance testing across web applications, making it a comprehensive choice for regression testing, SAP automation, and performance analysis.

What are the key features of OpenText Silk Test?

Scripting and Recording Capabilities: Integrates with Visual Studio for efficient script creation.
Cross-Browser Testing: Supports multiple browsers ensuring comprehensive coverage.
GUI Object Recognition: Enhances automation accuracy with reliable object identification.
Multi-Language Support: Facilitates diverse testing environments.
Robust Reporting: Detailed insights into testing processes and outcomes.
SAP Testing Functionality: Optimizes SAP project performance.

What benefits can users expect from OpenText Silk Test?

Enhanced Test Efficiency: Streamlines automation processes for faster results.
Comprehensive Test Management: Manages test cases systematically for improved organization.
Improved Accuracy in Automation: Reduces errors with precise object recognition.
Scalability: Adapts to different project sizes and complexities.
Performance Testing Integration: Identifies and resolves bottlenecks efficiently.

OpenText Silk Test is widely implemented in industries requiring high precision in data handling and performance analysis. It is commonly used in financial services for month-end regression testing and SAP projects for effective automation. Manual, functional, and performance testing in ERP systems further showcases its diverse application in complex business environments.

OpenText

TestProject is a free end-to-end test automation platform for web, mobile, and API testing that’s supported by the #1 test automation community.

Tricentis

Sample Customers

Krung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, Mªller, AVG Technologies

IBM, Wix, Flir, Payoneer

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

August 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Katalon Studio, Worksoft and others in Test Automation Tools. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

914,351 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.