Silk Test vs TestProject comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Micro Focus Logo
3,695 views|2,441 comparisons
Tricentis Logo
6,067 views|2,931 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Silk Test and TestProject based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Test Automation Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Silk Test vs. TestProject Report (Updated: November 2022).
655,465 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Scripting is the most valuable. We are able to record and then go in and modify the script that it creates. It has a lot of generative scripts.""A good automation tool that supports SAP functional testing."

More Silk Test Pros →

"The automation and AI are very good.""Ability to carry out automatic testing without having coding knowledge.""The ease of web and mobile functional testing is pretty easy on TestProject."

More TestProject Pros →

Cons
"We moved to Ranorex because the solution did not easily scale, and we could not find good and short term third-party help. We needed to have a bigger pool of third-party contractors that we could draw on for specific implementations. Silk didn't have that, and we found what we needed for Ranorex here in the Houston area. It would be good if there is more community support. I don't know if Silk runs a user conference once a year and how they set up partners. We need to be able to talk to somebody more than just on the phone. It really comes right down to that. The generated automated script was highly dependent upon screen position and other keys that were not as robust as we wanted. We found the automated script generated by Ranorex and the other key information about a specific data point to be more robust. It handled the transition better when we moved from computer to computer and from one size of the application to the other size. When we restarted Silk, we typically had to recalibrate screen elements within the script. Ranorex also has some of these same issues, but when we restart, it typically is faster, which is important.""Could be more user-friendly on the installation and configuration side."

More Silk Test Cons →

"In an upcoming release, there should be a SaaS offering available.""We'd like to see a direct cloud from TestProject instead of some other third party.""Difficult trying to configure on more than one browser."

More TestProject Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We paid annually. There is a purchase cost, and then there is an ongoing maintenance fee."
  • More Silk Test Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    655,465 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We used it for data-driven automated tests that have numeric calculations with high precision requirements. We probably are using the version from two years ago.
    Top Answer:It is a fine product. It is just like any other tool. It is a powerful tool, and it needs commitment. Our way to get that on top of our workload was to find a short term contractor. If you've got the… more »
    Top Answer:A good automation tool that supports SAP functional testing.
    Top Answer:Ability to carry out automatic testing without having coding knowledge.
    Top Answer:I have had some difficulty trying to configure it on several browsers. I was able to configure several tests, but I can run in one browser only. Whenever I run a test they always fail when they need… more »
    Top Answer:I'm a QA specialist and customer of TestProject.
    Ranking
    17th
    Views
    3,695
    Comparisons
    2,441
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    648
    Rating
    7.5
    18th
    Views
    6,067
    Comparisons
    2,931
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    370
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Segue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test
    Learn More
    Overview
    SilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.

    TestProject is a free end-to-end test automation platform for web, mobile, and API testing that’s supported by the #1 test automation community.

    Offer
    Learn more about Silk Test
    Learn more about TestProject
    Sample Customers
    Krung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, Mªller, AVG Technologies
    IBM, Wix, Flir, Payoneer
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company26%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise60%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise71%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise60%
    Buyer's Guide
    Silk Test vs. TestProject
    November 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about Silk Test vs. TestProject and other solutions. Updated: November 2022.
    655,465 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Silk Test is ranked 17th in Test Automation Tools with 2 reviews while TestProject is ranked 18th in Test Automation Tools with 3 reviews. Silk Test is rated 7.6, while TestProject is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Silk Test writes "A stable solution with good scripting feature, but needs better scalability and a bigger pool of third-party contractors". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TestProject writes "Open-source with good reporting but needs to offer better performance". Silk Test is most compared with Micro Focus UFT One, Selenium HQ, Apache JMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional and Tricentis Tosca, whereas TestProject is most compared with Katalon Studio, Tricentis Tosca, SmartBear TestComplete, LambdaTest and BrowserStack. See our Silk Test vs. TestProject report.

    See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.