BrowserStack vs TestProject [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

The compared BrowserStack and Tricentis solutions aren't in the same category. BrowserStack is ranked #4 in FT , with an average rating of 8.0, and holds a 2.9% mindshare in the category. Additionally, 100% of BrowserStack users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 71% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

BrowserStack

Read 33 BrowserStack reviews

6,189 Views
5,075 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

TestProject [EOL]

Read 6 TestProject [EOL] reviews

71% willing to recommend

BrowserStack

TestProject [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between BrowserStack and TestProject [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, OpenText and others in Functional Testing Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,533 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BrowserStack

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (4th), AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools (1st)

TestProject [EOL]

Average Rating

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Rishoo Mittal

Managing Technical Consultant at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Cross-platform testing has accelerated releases and now needs smarter AI-driven test creation

The best features that BrowserStack offers include the ability to run manual and automated tests on real devices. We can create bugs, integrate it with other platforms like Jira or Azure, and use self-healing scripts with Selenium. We also have the test runs for different versions or with different frameworks, not just Selenium but with Playwright as well. Additionally, there are real-time dashboards and notifications sent when tests fail or when we need screenshots or recordings of test executions, and we can easily integrate this into our pipelines. BrowserStack has positively impacted my organization by providing an out-of-the-box solution for whole test executions across different projects for our automobile customers. We have worked on around twenty to thirty projects, and the need for a stable, customizable single test execution platform that supports different platforms has been met. It has helped manage the entire quality assurance of the product efficiently. The measurable improvements due to BrowserStack include a significant efficiency gain, allowing the whole team to collaborate on testing and communicate faster. Also, the easier integration with project management tools has been beneficial. The documentation of findings has improved, which helps us share insights with different project stakeholders.

Read full review

Ashu Singh

Senior quality analyst at Lalli

An easy-to-use tool that saves time and functions within a limited budget

The solution's reporting system should be clearer and easier to understand for a layperson. I and some other experts may be able to understand the solution's reporting system, but a layperson won't understand it. For a layperson, the solution should be easy to use. Price-wise, TestProject is an expensive product. The product's current price should be lowered to attract potential customers.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of BrowserStack is the ability to do manual testing."

"For BrowserStack, it's helpful for me to test on different devices."

"I like that it offers full device capability."

"BrowserStack positively impacts my organization by saving time in the QA testing process and clarifying the mission, which is important."

"It is a stable solution. There's no lagging and jittering."

"The solution has many benefits, we are not worried about maintaining devices locally in our organization."

"More than a feature, it was the hardware support that we were able to get through the interfaces, and this helped us address a very rare requirement that had come up within our end customer's stack."

"The setup was quite simple. The website easily explains how to set it up and if you want to integrate it with BMP tools there are online simple step tutorials."

More BrowserStack pros

"The script-less part of it was good for novice users."

"The ease of web and mobile functional testing is pretty easy on TestProject."

"Since implementing this solution, our code management has been reduced by 40% to 60%."

"The product has a very good record-and-play functionality."

"The automation and AI are very good."

"One of the valuable features the solution offers is the chance to be able to perform automatic tests by recording, and to create them without having coding knowledge."

"Ability to carry out automatic testing without having coding knowledge."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

Cons

"BrowserStack sometimes works well and other times it is very slow."

"My experience with pricing was that it was a bit on the higher side, around three hundred dollars per user per month, and I hoped it could be reduced."

"I think false positives are an area where BrowserStack can improve, as I have often seen things working fine on actual devices, but on BrowserStack devices, issues arise due to network slowness or AWS region connectivity problems that cause lag."

"BrowserStack is very expensive and they keep increasing their cost, which is absolutely ridiculous, especially when someone like LambdaTest is coming through for literal thousands of dollars less, with the same services."

"While I was testing I was not 100% sure a that was properly mimicking the browsers or not. We had some issues with a browser, and the reason was the browser itself does not provide any support. If the local system does not provide any support, I think this was the problem. There should be better integration with other solutions, such as JIRA."

"Connectivity can sometimes mar the testing experience."

"Initial set-up is easy, but if you start with automation, it's bit confusing and I found it tough to set-up."

"It is difficult to use for someone who has little to no experience."

More BrowserStack cons

"In an upcoming release, there should be a SaaS offering available."

"A company would not be able to scale with just this solution."

"I have had some difficulty trying to configure it on several browsers."

"The support is a weak point since they discontinued the tool."

"I and some other experts may be able to understand the solution's reporting system, but a layperson won't understand it."

"Technical support is an area they need to work on, they are too slow to resolve issues."

"Difficult trying to configure on more than one browser."

"We'd like to see a direct cloud from TestProject instead of some other third party."

More TestProject [EOL] cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"BrowserStack could have a better price, but good things have a price."

"The price is fine."

"This solution costs less than competing products."

"Compared to other solutions, BrowserStack is one of the cheapest."

"My company found the product's license to be very compatible with our budget, and we pay 5,000 to 10,000 per year for licenses."

"There are different licenses available that can be customized. You can select the features that you want only to use which can be a cost-benefit."

"As for pricing, I can't provide a clear evaluation as I'm not directly involved in those discussions."

"The price of BrowserStack is high."

"The solution is free."

"Price-wise, TestProject is an expensive product...With TestProject, there is a need to pay a certain amount towards its licensing costs."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,533 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BrowserStack?

I purchased BrowserStack through the AWS Marketplace.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BrowserStack?

Improvements for BrowserStack could include better usability when working under a private network or a VPN, since it can be challenging to access restricted URLs. There are times when running an au...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for BrowserStack?

In the start of my career, I performed functional testing on mobile devices and web applications, and I used BrowserStack for testing web applications and mobile applications for one year. My main ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Sauce Labs vs BrowserStack

Compared 10% of the time

Perfecto vs BrowserStack

Compared 9% of the time

TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) vs BrowserStack

Compared 9% of the time

CrossBrowserTesting vs BrowserStack

Compared 5% of the time

Galen Framework vs BrowserStack

Compared 4% of the time

More BrowserStack Competitors

Testim vs TestProject [EOL]

Compared 23% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs TestProject [EOL]

Compared 21% of the time

Katalon Studio vs TestProject [EOL]

Compared 19% of the time

TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) vs TestProject [EOL]

Compared 19% of the time

More TestProject [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BrowserStack

October 2026

Download BrowserStack product report

Buyer's Guide

TestProject [EOL]

September 2026

Download TestProject [EOL] product report

Overview

BrowserStack offers a cloud-based testing solution that facilitates comprehensive cross-platform testing for web and mobile apps, allowing efficient testing across devices, browsers, and operating systems without the need for physical hardware.

It provides integration with project management tools and enables parallel and cross-browser testing, enhancing collaboration with an intuitive interface. Support for real devices offers better insight compared to simulators and helps in reducing manual efforts through automation capabilities. Companies benefit from BrowserStack's vast device range that ensures efficient testing and improved quality at a reduced cost.

What are BrowserStack's key features?

Device Diversity: Access a broad range of real devices for testing.
Integration: Seamlessly integrates with project management tools.
Parallel Testing: Enables parallel execution to improve efficiency.
Automation: Supports automated testing to reduce manual workload.

What benefits should users consider?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces expenses by eliminating the need for physical devices.
Improved Testing Quality: Ensures high quality through real device insights.
Enhanced Collaboration: Streamlined interface for better team cooperation.
Time Savings: Faster testing with parallel execution capabilities.

In industries like software development and IT services, BrowserStack aids businesses in testing compatibility, performance, and responsiveness across platforms, addressing issues like UI challenges and ensuring legacy application support on older systems. Companies utilize it to refine app quality, using tools such as Selenium and APM for comprehensive test automation.

BrowserStack

TestProject is a free end-to-end test automation platform for web, mobile, and API testing that’s supported by the #1 test automation community.

Tricentis

Sample Customers

Microsoft, RBS, jQuery, Expedia, Citrix, AIG

IBM, Wix, Flir, Payoneer

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

October 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, OpenText and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,533 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.