SAP NetWeaver vs Veritas CloudPoint comparison

"It saves a lot of time, a lot of paperwork, and it is value for money."

"The stability is not an issue, and I would rate it at seven out of ten."

"The most valuable feature of SAP NetWeaver is the integration and it is a complete solution."

"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"It's a good product."

"The presentation is the most valuable feature. It's very conceptual. We had to follow the instructions very strictly. It's a Dutch or German product and we had to follow it step-by-step."

"It provides an efficient integration framework with other SAP products."

"We can use different transaction codes to check the performance of the system, and if we are unable to access a particular transaction, we can still check the table to see what is happening."

"The product is good for volume-level backups."

"The most valuable features are the indexing, the file-level restore, and the replications between regions."

"I would rate Veritas CloudPoint a ten because it's done everything it says it'll do, and we've really not had many problems with it."

"The initial setup is very easy and quite straightforward."

"The most valuable features are the indexing, the file-level restore, and the replications between regions."

"The initial setup is a little complex. The users are not able to install the prerequisite drivers or are not able to follow the SOP because they don't have access to SAP Logon. If users already have access, it will take seven to 10 days to deploy the solution. If they do not, it may take a maximum of 25 to 30 days."

"SAP NetWeaver should be better integrated with other products outside of SAP."

"It can always improve. It should have the ability to connect with other databases. It was a little bit tough to do that. I would like to have the ability to research certain markets and then integrate it with NetWeaver. I'd like to compare it with other databases from other companies being used in the world so we can integrate it with our own products to compare if we are still current on the market."

"SAP NetWeaver it's still complex for a normal user unless you memorize those action codes."

"Though SAP NetWeaver has been pretty stable and mature, some issues arose after some customizations, so that's an area for improvement."

"The product documentation can be improved."

"Every time we do an integration with SAP, it's complicated and it's expensive."

"SAP NetWeaver PI is not connected to the cloud."

"They are niche with the work that they do, but they should have more integration with NetBackup and the reporting is something they should be working towards improving."

"I don't care for the pricing or capacity license model from Veritas CloudPoint because there are cases where we back up the same data multiple times, yet we still owe from a capacity standpoint based on how much data is managed in our backups."

"They are niche with the work that they do, but they should have more integration with NetBackup and the reporting is something they should be working towards improving."

"The product needs to improve its file-level or granular-level backups."

"The product needs to improve its file-level or granular-level backups."

"SAP NetWeaver requires a license, but I'm not sure how the licenses and payments were coordinated."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing a nine to ten since it is an expensive solution."

"It's a very expensive solution."

"The licensing costs are on a yearly basis."

"When comparing to other solutions, the price is at par."