No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management vs Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

SAP Extended Enterprise Con...
Ranking in Enterprise Content Management
14th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Sharepoint 2010 on Windows ...
Ranking in Enterprise Content Management
55th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Enterprise Content Management category, the mindshare of SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management is 1.8%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is 0.3%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Content Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management1.8%
Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x70.3%
Other97.9%
Enterprise Content Management
 

Featured Reviews

MukeshGiri - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Solution Architect at Freeport LNG Development, L.P.
Offers advanced search capabilities, integrates seamlessly with SAP and efficiently stores non-essential business content
Consider you have some use cases. For example, something for your accounting or procurement department. And you purchase equipment, machines, and plants for plant-related operations. Essentially, there will be manuals and basically anything and everything related to your particular equipment. So, where do the equipment entries go? They go into SAP. Depending on your SAP deployment, it can go into some database. Most companies these days are talking about SAP HANA and stuff like that. So it will be stored in SAP HANA. But, these documentation, drawings, manuals, and help files for these big pieces of equipment, where do they go? That’s where Extended ECM for SAP comes into the picture. All these integrations are through a one-way push, essentially, but with two-way access. So as a user in the procurement department or the accounting department, or an engineering department where you are using SAP for asset management entries inside your system. All those related documents, drawings, manuals, and files have to be stored somewhere. If you store them in SAP, it will be a costly implementation going forward. After maybe a couple of years, you will realize that it’s too much to deal with because HANA database will be too costly. There will not be much business value because you cannot utilize a lot of search and cool features inside your application from an SAP perspective. That’s where you will integrate SAP. For example, SAP Extended ECM for SAP Plant Maintenance. One of the modules SAP provides is SAP Plant Maintenance. So what you will do is deploy Extended ECM for SAP, then try something called SAP Plant Maintenance, Extended ECM for SAP Plant Maintenance. The content maintenance, manuals, files, drawings, and related stuff, its details or tags, or any kind of stuff is stored in your SAP. But anything and everything else is pushed through this integration into Extended ECM platform. So now it is available to be utilized by your business user who knows nothing about SAP. They only live and breathe in a different management system. They can look into these details depending on what kind of integration has been done for that company. So that’s one use case. Second use case will be in SAP itself. Now, if you are an SAP user, you have this information readily available at your fingertips. Anything goes wrong in your maintenance or any kind of management, you can look into these details, which are readily available because this documentation lifecycle is being managed by Extended ECM for SAP. It will give you extended storage capabilities within your SAP application. So it will be a two-way integration, essentially. Similar, wider features will be available within Extended ECM platform. Within SAP, you have these extra features called business attachments or business content retrieval. Those business contents are stored inside Extended ECM, and those features will be available within your SAP GUI from an SAP perspective. So it’s a win-win situation for both worlds.
Christine Ndanu - PeerSpot reviewer
Project Manager at PwC
Cloud file management has improved collaboration and strengthened security across our teams
Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 has positively impacted my organization by improving collaboration, especially through remote collaboration due to the use of a mobile application. Security posture in my organization has really improved due to the robust security features of Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7. Furthermore, it can be accessed from anywhere, making collaboration easy. Some of the best features Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 offers are in-built Office suite, works just from any browser, cloud-based, no additional app download is required, alerts and notifications are on par, version control to view any changes made, and access control over any file or folder. The mobile application and remote collaboration features helped my team improve collaboration and also increased our security posture after we implemented Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 in all our organization departments.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"All these integrations are through a one-way push, essentially, but with two-way access."
"The integration capabilities of the product are pretty good."
"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 has positively impacted my organization by greatly increasing our collaboration, especially between departmental and remote collaboration."
"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 has positively impacted my organization with apparent savings from the top and up front, with cost reduction, productivity increase, and saved time and efforts in terms of the team's collaborations."
"Since I started using Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7, it has increased productivity, with collaboration improving from forty to fifty-five percent."
"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 has positively impacted my organization by providing savings through automation, giving our clients the best replacement for desk jobs and the best way to automate daily tasks."
"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is a great tool that has led to faster turnaround times, less back and forth, improved customer service, more transparency into team functions, elimination of steps through processes, and reengineering, thereby saving cost and time."
"I have seen a return on investment with Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7, as it has given our clients the best replacement for desk jobs and provided them the best tool to automate daily tasks, hence saving a lot of time and cost."
"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 has positively impacted my organization by making processes easier and improving productivity."
"My main use case for Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is that it serves as a great collaboration tool."
 

Cons

"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The deployment could be costly because of resource availability."
"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 can be improved with configuration that is simple without becoming complex and does not depend heavily on the IT department."
"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 can be improved as it still needs to integrate some services together such as Planner and Lists so that teams can interact from a single place."
"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is very easy to use, but it has some drawbacks in that typical user experience is perceived by many users as difficult or clunky."
"Occasionally, we would somehow have an issue with one or two users not seeing the latest document, which was a minor annoyance, but after a few minutes, we were able to get back on track due to Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7."
"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 can be improved with better documentation, especially the online documentation for new learners."
"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 can be improved in browser support, which is one of the biggest areas where Sharepoint can improve."
"One way Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 can be improved is by merging two or more Sharepoint sites from different companies together if they are working together."
"Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 should work offline and there is no password protection for folders."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the product price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Energy/Utilities Company
17%
University
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise10
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management?
Improvement could be more about training because it is one of the giants in this market. Nobody can be exposed to SAP and other stuff. So the deployment could be costly because of resource availabi...
What is your primary use case for SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management?
For engineering in the oil and gas industry, most of these companies, specifically in the Texas region, are kind of OpenText customers. Since we all do bigger enterprises and stuff like that, I go ...
What advice do you have for others considering SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management?
I would rate it maybe eight out of ten because I’ve seen the stability. It’s amazingly stable. We have not completely rolled it out the way I would like to, but we are looking into that. Most likel...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management by OpenText, SAP Extended ECM
No data available
 

Overview

Information not available
 

Sample Customers

Metropolitan Utilities District, MAN Diesel & Turbo
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Adobe and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: March 2026.
885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.