"Good support for single sign-on protocols."
"Symantec Siteminder Is both scalable and stable."
"It's quite scalable."
"The solution is easy to use for our managers."
"A valuable feature of Siteminder is the way it handles bulk traffic. The features it has, in terms of routing the traffic and load balancing, are good."
"Security could be improved."
"The support could be faster."
"The technical support could be better."
"Some of the new protocols, like OAuth 2.0, could be improved."
"An area Siteminder could improve on is that there are a few limitations, in terms of new protocols for OpenID. If I want to have different scopes, the features are limited. They also do not have APIs exposed, which is a major drawback. API is a feature I would like to see included in the next release."
Red Hat Single Sign On is ranked 15th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 1 review while Symantec Siteminder is ranked 9th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 4 reviews. Red Hat Single Sign On is rated 7.0, while Symantec Siteminder is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Red Hat Single Sign On writes "Good support for latest protocols and extensible; security could be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Siteminder writes "Useful for single sign-on and handles bulk traffic well". Red Hat Single Sign On is most compared with Okta Workforce Identity, Auth0, Azure Active Directory (Azure AD) and PingFederate, whereas Symantec Siteminder is most compared with Okta Workforce Identity, Azure Active Directory (Azure AD), PingFederate, ForgeRock and CyberArk Identity.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
